Cited by 1Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Law and Welfare

PTSD assistance dogs: concerns for animal well-being, rights, and justice

Open access
Kiiroja, Laura, Gadbois, Simon, Fenton, Andrew·2025·Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Abstract

PTSD assistance dogs are service dogs trained to assist individuals living with PTSD. A growing body of research links the use of PTSD assistance dogs with substantial benefits for their human partners, including significant reductions in PTSD symptoms, and improvements in family functioning, social integration, and quality of life. However, research on the effect of assistance work on PTSD assistance dogs themselves is notably lacking. This paper aims to address this gap by mapping potential animal welfare and ethical concerns associated with PTSD assistance dog interventions. Moreover, a rights-oriented approach is employed, with the aim of suggesting guidelines that promote interspecies justice and contribute to the dogs’ well-being. The discussion highlights significant welfare concerns due to the lack of standardisation in the selection, rearing, training, and follow-up care of PTSD assistance dogs. Some of the symptoms and comorbidities common in people with PTSD (e.g., dysregulated anger, substance use disorder), along with some trained tasks of the dogs (e.g., diffusing the human’s episodes of distress/anger and interrupting flashbacks/nightmares), further exacerbate these concerns. PTSD assistance dogs also share a number of potential welfare issues with other assistance dogs, such as disruption of close relationships, lack of control over their physical and social environment, and insufficient down-time. To prevent animal exploitation and foster ethically desirable relationships with PTSD assistance dogs, their work conditions should not only minimise risks of harm but allow them to flourish and live a good life. Proposed guidelines include treating the dogs as agents, respecting their sustained dissent, providing sufficient rest, and allowing them to pursue their own interests. Furthermore, the work of PTSD assistance dogs should be enjoyable and beneficial for the involved canines, requiring force-free, non-aversive training and handling methods, and a strong bond with the human partner. Future research is needed to empirically investigate the welfare and ethical concerns highlighted in this paper, aiming to develop optimal practices that ensure PTSD assistance dog well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fvets.2025.1658857

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mitigating excessive arousal in animal shelters may support adoption success and adaptation to home environments.

    “Mitigating excessive arousal in animal shelters may therefore support adoption success and adaptation to home environments, either as pet dogs or in working roles (e.g., assistance dogs) (23).”

    From Combined enrichment and pharmaceutical intervention reduces excessive arousal in shelter dogs in a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The 'Potential welfare concerns of PTSD assistance dogs' section says kennel conditions can cause stress and hyperactivity, and that resulting behavioural issues may compromise shelter-sourced dogs’ future welfare and performance as assistance dogs. This supports the proposed benefit for working roles, but the paper does not link mitigating arousal to adoption success or adaptation to a home as a pet. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  2. Bryant, 2021, Posttraumatic stress disorder, 151
  3. Trimble, 1985, Posttraumatic stress disorder: the history of a concept, 5
  4. Sapolsky, 2004, Why Zebras Don’t get ulcers: The acclaimed guide to stress, stress-related diseases, and coping
  5. Kulka, 1990, Trauma and the Vietnam war generation: Report of findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study
  6. Vincent, 2019, Psychiatric service dog outcomes for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder over an 18 month-period: a pilot study, J Neurol Psychiatr Disord, 1, 110
  7. Kymlicka, 2018, Rights, 320
  8. Donaldson, 2011, Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights
  9. Coppinger, 2001, Dogs: A new understanding of canine origin, behavior and evolution
  10. Willis, 1995, Genetic aspects of dog behaviour with particular reference to working ability, 51
  11. Hennessy, 2013, The dog encyclopedia: The definitive visual guide
  12. Tiira, 2019, Koirien käyttäytyminen ja persoonallisuus
  13. Palmer, 2018, Welfare, 424
  14. Stilwell, 2013, Train your dog positively: Understand your dog and solve common behavior problems including separation anxiety, excessive barking, aggression, housetraining, leash pulling, and more!
  15. Addams, 2007, Management of red fox (
  16. Dunbar, 2004, Before and after getting your puppy: The positive approach to raising a happy, healthy, and well-behaved dog
  17. Michaels, 2022, The do no harm dog training and behavior handbook: Featuring the hierarchy of dog needs
  18. Handelman, 2008, Canine behavior: A photo illustrated handbook
  19. Hallgren, 2006, AlfaSyndromet: om ledarskap och rangordning hos hundar
  20. Pryor, 1999, Don’t shoot the dog!: The new art of teaching and training
  21. Pratt, 1980, Alternatives to pain in experiments on animals
  22. Morland, 2020, Anger and PTSD, PTSD Res Q, 31, 1
  23. Blattner, 2020, Introduction: animal labour and the quest for interspecies justice, 1
  24. Blattner, 2020, Animal labour: toward a prohibition of forced labour and a right to freely choose one’s work, 91
  25. Meynell, 2023, Applied ethics primer
  26. Probyn-Rapsey, 2018, Anthropocentrism, 47

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiiroja, L., Gadbois, S., & Fenton, A.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Kiiroja, Laura
Venue
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-12-17
Volume
12
Pages
1658857-1658857
ISSN
2297-1769 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417436524
Cited by
1
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Dalhousie University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
Keywords
animal welfare, animal ethics, interspecies justice, animal rights, service dogs, animal welfare guidelines, animal exploitation, human-animal bond, PTSD comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review