The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopamine regulation of social choice in a monogamous rodent species
Open accessAbstract
There is growing appreciation that social decision making in humans is strongly influenced by hedonic and emotional processing. The field of social neuroeconomics has shown that neural systems important for reward are associated with social choice and social preferences in humans. Here, we show that the neurobiology of social preferences in a monogamous rodent species, the prairie vole, is also regulated by neural systems involved in reward and emotional processing. Specifically, we describe how mesolimbic dopamine transmission differentially mediates the formation and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds in this species. Thus, reward processing exerts tremendous regulation over social choice behaviors that serve as the foundation of a rather complex social organization. We conclude that prairie voles are an excellent model system for the neuroscience of social choice and that complex social decision-making can be robustly explained by reward and hedonic processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These data suggest that the plastic change in D1R that occurs during pair bonding is causative in the development of selective aggression behavior, which helps to prevent the formation of a new pair bond with a new potential mate. (These topics are reviewed in Aragona and Wang 2009.)”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Aragona and Wang 2009
In the citing paper
“These results suggest that D2R activation in the NAC shell enhances, while D1R activation inhibits, pair bond formation. (For a review see Aragona and Wang 2009.)”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Aragona and Wang 2009
In the citing paper
“Pair-bond formation is a social cognitive process that involves both social recognition and social reward (27–29) and models a human attachment relationship far more closely than do the social interactions of adult mice or rats.”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010 · cited 2×
“Such behaviors are the result of selection processes that favored reciprocity among close social groups, in which it was adaptive for individuals to spend relatively small amounts of energy to help unrelated members of the group in order to receive relatively large benefi ts of the resulting social organization (Pfeif…”
BackgroundEcology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems
Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.327542 · Cited by 6,230 · cited 2×
“…voles show high levels of parental care (Getz and Carter, 1996; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and it has been suggested that both parents are necessary for pup survival which selected for highly enduring pair bonds (Emlen and Oring, 1977; Kleiman, 1977; McGuire et al., 1993; Wang and Novak, 1992).”
BackgroundNeural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion
Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1579 · Cited by 3,785 · cited 2×
“In particular, DA transmission within the NAc is critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice…”
BackgroundOxytocin increases trust in humans
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03701 · Cited by 3,690 · cited 3×
“Finally, we compare these fi ndings to studies that have examined the neural regulation of social decision-making in humans (Fisher et al., 2005; Kosfeld et al., 2005; Rilling et al., 2002).”
BackgroundResultDopamine receptors: from structure to function
MISSALE, C., NASH, S. R., ROBINSON, S. W., JABER, M., & CARON, M. G. (1998) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189 · Cited by 3,633 · cited 3×
“While apomorphine binds both D1 and D2-like receptors, it binds D2-like receptors with a much greater affi nity (Missale et al., 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialDopamine, learning and motivation.
Wise, R. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1406 · Cited by 3,379 · cited 2×
“, 2006; Wang and Aragona, 2004; Young and Wang, 2004) and associative learning is signifi cantly regulated by mesolimbic DA transmission (Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007; Kelley, 2004; Wise, 2004).”
BackgroundThe neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082976 · Cited by 3,375 · cited 2×
“…because it involves more than one agent and thus requires more sophisticated learning alorithms (Lee, 2008), or if it is more informative to regard social decision-making as largely guided by emotional social motivation and hedonic processing (Sanfey et al., 2003; Skuse and Gallagher, 2009).”
BackgroundGetting formal with dopamine and reward
Schultz, W. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00967-4 · Cited by 2,574 · cited 1×
“These data indicate that, under natural circumstances, DA transmission is not uniformly increased as it is under certainly laboratory conditionings (Schultz, 2002).”
BackgroundBlair, W. F., Hall, E. R., & Kelson, K. R. (1959) · The Southwestern Naturalist · doi:10.2307/3669094 · Cited by 2,485
The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience
Berridge, K. C. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x · Cited by 2,347 · cited 1×
“Thus, DA transmission within the NAc shell may regulate partner preference formation through enhanced reward processing or incentive motivation (Berridge, 2007; Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007).”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Insel, T. R. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.005 · Cited by 1,044
Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior
Carter, C. S. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115110 · Cited by 714
“However, the dynamic interplay between these two peptides and a host of other molecules, such as dopamine (Aragona & Wang 2009, Young et al. 2011) and endogenous opioids (Burkett et al. 2011), supports social behaviors, especially in the face of challenge.”
BackgroundThe neurobiology of pair bonding: Insights from a socially monogamous rodent
Young, K. A., Gobrogge, K. L., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.07.006 · Cited by 389
“to maintain the existing pair bond [8,10] and to limit extra-pair copulations.”
Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine
Love, T. M. (2014) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.011 · Cited by 369
“Pair bonded males will then exhibit affiliative behavior towards their mates while expressing aggressive behavior towards strangers that can be blocked through antagonism of D1-like receptors within the nucleus accumbens (Aragona and Wang, 2009).”
InfluentialStress, social behavior, and resilience: Insights from rodents
Beery, A. K., & Kaufer, D. (2014) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.10.004 · Cited by 395
“Many studies have also investigated the role of the mesolimbic dopamine system and opioid regulation of rewarding social behaviors such as pair-bonds between mates (Aragona, 2009; Resendez et al., 2012); we describe these and additional research avenues throughout.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Aragona, B. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aragona, Brandon J.
- ORCID
- Aragona, Brandon J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 15-15
- ISSN
- 1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2729670
- OpenAlex
- W2004213341
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DAR01-19627, MHR01-58616, DAK02-23048)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dopamine, social choice, Microtus ochrogaster, monogamy, pair bonding, pair bond maintenance, reward processing, social decision-making, social preferences, emotional processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review