The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopamine regulation of social choice in a monogamous rodent species
Open accessAbstract
There is growing appreciation that social decision making in humans is strongly influenced by hedonic and emotional processing. The field of social neuroeconomics has shown that neural systems important for reward are associated with social choice and social preferences in humans. Here, we show that the neurobiology of social preferences in a monogamous rodent species, the prairie vole, is also regulated by neural systems involved in reward and emotional processing. Specifically, we describe how mesolimbic dopamine transmission differentially mediates the formation and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds in this species. Thus, reward processing exerts tremendous regulation over social choice behaviors that serve as the foundation of a rather complex social organization. We conclude that prairie voles are an excellent model system for the neuroscience of social choice and that complex social decision-making can be robustly explained by reward and hedonic processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These data suggest that the plastic change in D1R that occurs during pair bonding is causative in the development of selective aggression behavior, which helps to prevent the formation of a new pair bond with a new potential mate. (These topics are reviewed in Aragona and Wang 2009.)”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Aragona and Wang 2009
In the citing paper
“These results suggest that D2R activation in the NAC shell enhances, while D1R activation inhibits, pair bond formation. (For a review see Aragona and Wang 2009.)”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Aragona and Wang 2009
In the citing paper
“Pair-bond formation is a social cognitive process that involves both social recognition and social reward (27–29) and models a human attachment relationship far more closely than do the social interactions of adult mice or rats.”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010 · cited 2×
“Such behaviors are the result of selection processes that favored reciprocity among close social groups, in which it was adaptive for individuals to spend relatively small amounts of energy to help unrelated members of the group in order to receive relatively large benefi ts of the resulting social organization (Pfeif…”
BackgroundEcology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems
Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.327542 · Cited by 6,230 · cited 2×
“…voles show high levels of parental care (Getz and Carter, 1996; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and it has been suggested that both parents are necessary for pup survival which selected for highly enduring pair bonds (Emlen and Oring, 1977; Kleiman, 1977; McGuire et al., 1993; Wang and Novak, 1992).”
BackgroundNeural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion
Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1579 · Cited by 3,785 · cited 2×
“In particular, DA transmission within the NAc is critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice…”
BackgroundOxytocin increases trust in humans
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03701 · Cited by 3,690 · cited 3×
“Finally, we compare these fi ndings to studies that have examined the neural regulation of social decision-making in humans (Fisher et al., 2005; Kosfeld et al., 2005; Rilling et al., 2002).”
BackgroundResultDopamine receptors: from structure to function
MISSALE, C., NASH, S. R., ROBINSON, S. W., JABER, M., & CARON, M. G. (1998) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189 · Cited by 3,633 · cited 3×
“While apomorphine binds both D1 and D2-like receptors, it binds D2-like receptors with a much greater affi nity (Missale et al., 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialDopamine, learning and motivation.
Wise, R. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1406 · Cited by 3,379 · cited 2×
“, 2006; Wang and Aragona, 2004; Young and Wang, 2004) and associative learning is signifi cantly regulated by mesolimbic DA transmission (Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007; Kelley, 2004; Wise, 2004).”
BackgroundThe neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082976 · Cited by 3,375 · cited 2×
“…because it involves more than one agent and thus requires more sophisticated learning alorithms (Lee, 2008), or if it is more informative to regard social decision-making as largely guided by emotional social motivation and hedonic processing (Sanfey et al., 2003; Skuse and Gallagher, 2009).”
BackgroundGetting formal with dopamine and reward
Schultz, W. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00967-4 · Cited by 2,574 · cited 1×
“These data indicate that, under natural circumstances, DA transmission is not uniformly increased as it is under certainly laboratory conditionings (Schultz, 2002).”
BackgroundBlair, W. F., Hall, E. R., & Kelson, K. R. (1959) · The Southwestern Naturalist · doi:10.2307/3669094 · Cited by 2,485
The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience
Berridge, K. C. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x · Cited by 2,347 · cited 1×
“Thus, DA transmission within the NAc shell may regulate partner preference formation through enhanced reward processing or incentive motivation (Berridge, 2007; Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007).”
BackgroundBerridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(03)00233-9 · Cited by 1,869 · cited 2×
“In particular, DA transmission within the NAc is critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice…”
BackgroundThe neurobiology of pair bonding.
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1327 · Cited by 1,523 · cited 6×
“Here, we describe how the use of one such model system, the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), has signifi cantly advanced our understanding of the neural regulation of social choice behavior (Carter et al., 1995; Dewsbury, 1987; Getz and Carter, 1996; Young and Wang, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIkemoto, S. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 1,477 · cited 1×
“This sub-region is critical for processing positive affect and unconditioned aspects of associative learning (Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007; Ikemoto, 2007; Pecina et al., 2006).”
BackgroundA neural basis for social cooperation
Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00755-9 · Cited by 1,451 · cited 4×
“Finally, we compare these fi ndings to studies that have examined the neural regulation of social decision-making in humans (Fisher et al., 2005; Kosfeld et al., 2005; Rilling et al., 2002).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKleiman, D. G. (1977) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409721 · Cited by 1,436 · cited 2×
“…voles show high levels of parental care (Getz and Carter, 1996; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and it has been suggested that both parents are necessary for pup survival which selected for highly enduring pair bonds (Emlen and Oring, 1977; Kleiman, 1977; McGuire et al., 1993; Wang and Novak, 1992).”
BackgroundThe neurobiology of attachment
Insel, T. R., & Young, L. J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35053579 · Cited by 1,173 · cited 1×
“Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org August 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 15 | 1 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE REVIEW ARTICLE published: 11 August 2009 doi: 10.3389/neuro.08.015.2009 and Getz, 1993; Getz and Hofmann, 1986; Insel and Young, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialSubsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking
Phillips, P. E. M., Stuber, G. D., Heien, M. L. A. V., Wightman, R. M., & Carelli, R. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01476 · Cited by 1,113 · cited 2×
“However, it will be necessary for future studies to test this by measuring real-time DA transmission (Aragona et al., 2008; Day et al., 2007; Phillips et al., 2003) during prairie vole social interactions to determine if in vivo DA transmission is consistent with the behavioral pharmacology described in this review.”
BackgroundResultNeural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations
Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140738 · Cited by 1,046
Reward, Motivation, and Emotion Systems Associated With Early-Stage Intense Romantic Love
Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00838.2004 · Cited by 963 · cited 1×
“Specifi cally, presentation of a picture of one’s partner increases activation of dopaminergic circuitry in a similar manner as that caused by monetary reward (Aron et al., 2005; Zald et al., 2004).”
ResultA role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles
Winslow, J. T., Hastings, N., Carter, C. S., Harbaugh, C. R., & Insel, T. R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365545a0 · Cited by 948 · cited 10×
“Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org August 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 15 | 3 stranger (Williams et al., 1992; Winslow et al., 1993).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialNeve, K. A., Seamans, J. K., & Trantham‐Davidson, H. (2004) · Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction · doi:10.1081/rrs-200029981 · Cited by 836 · cited 2×
“D1 and D2-like receptors have the opposite effects over cAMP signaling (Neve et al., 2004).”
BackgroundOxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles
Insel, T. R., & Shapiro, L. E. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.13.5981 · Cited by 833
Salamone, J. D., & Correa, M. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00282-6 · Cited by 817
Kelley, A. E. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.016 · Cited by 788
Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences
Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002 · Cited by 779 · cited 4×
“In social contexts, decision-making is signifi cantly infl uenced by positive or negative concern for the welfare of others (Fehr and Camerer, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialWhen Does "Economic Man" Dominate Social Behavior?
Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110600 · Cited by 736 · cited 1×
“…that this system mediates aspects of reward and emotional processing, its involvement in social decisionmaking among humans may explain why humans often display strong social preferences rather than always acting out of pure selfregard (Camerer and Fehr, 2006; Fehr and Camerer, 2007; Sanfey, 2007).”
BackgroundSocial Decision-Making: Insights from Game Theory and Neuroscience
Sanfey, A. G. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142996 · Cited by 719 · cited 5×
“Given that this system mediates aspects of reward and emotional processing, its involvement in social decisionmaking among humans may explain why humans often display strong social preferences rather than always acting out of pure selfregard (Camerer and Fehr, 2006; Fehr and Camerer, 2007; Sanfey, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialAssociative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens
Day, J. J., Roitman, M. F., Wightman, R. M., & Carelli, R. M. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1923 · Cited by 710 · cited 2×
“However, it will be necessary for future studies to test this by measuring real-time DA transmission (Aragona et al., 2008; Day et al., 2007; Phillips et al., 2003) during prairie vole social interactions to determine if in vivo DA transmission is consistent with the behavioral pharmacology described in this review.”
BackgroundResultLim, M. M., Wang, Z., Olazábal, D. E., Ren, X., Terwilliger, E. F., & Young, L. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02539 · Cited by 628
Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model
Sue Carter, C., Courtney Devries, A., & Getz, L. L. (1995) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/0149-7634(94)00070-h · Cited by 615 · cited 4×
“There are dramatic behavioral alterations as male prairie voles transition from sexually naive to fully pair bonded (Carter et al., 1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLiu, Y., & Wang, Z. X. (2003) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00555-4 · Cited by 580 · cited 9×
“Further, facilitation of partner preference formation by activation of oxytocin receptors is not effective if D2like receptors are blocked (Liu and Wang, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialErratum to: “Parsing reward” [Trends Neurosci. 26 (2003) 507–513]
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2003.09.001 · Cited by 562 · cited 1×
“In particular, DA transmission within the NAc is critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice…”
BackgroundReward system and addiction: what dopamine does and doesn’t do
DiChiara, G., & Bassareo, V. (2006) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2006.11.003 · Cited by 557 · cited 1×
“Pair bond formation is a naturally occurring association formed between monogamous mates (Aragona et al., 2006; Wang and Aragona, 2004; Young and Wang, 2004) and associative learning is signifi cantly regulated by mesolimbic DA transmission (Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007; Kelley, 2004; Wise, 2004).”
BackgroundHall, E. R. (1981) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13500820 · Cited by 547
Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits
Hammock, E. A. D., & Young, L. J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111427 · Cited by 545 · cited 2×
“…(Bales et al., 2007; Bamshad et al., 1993; Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Liu and Wang, 2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005; Lim et al., 2004b; Liu et al., 2001; Winslow et al., 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995, 1996; Lim et al., 2007),…”
Tamarin, R. H., & American Society of Mammalogists. (1985) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.39513 · Cited by 534
Cho, M. M., DeVries, A. C., Williams, J. R., & Carter, C. S. (1999) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.113.5.1071 · Cited by 529 · cited 1×
“However, there has been extensive work conducted on female prairie voles (Cho et al., 1999; Fowler et al., 2002; Insel and Hulihan, 1995; Williams et al., 1992; Witt et al., 1991) and it will be noted when data were collected using female subjects.”
BackgroundInsel, T. R., & Hulihan, T. J. (1995) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.109.4.782 · Cited by 528 · cited 1×
“However, there has been extensive work conducted on female prairie voles (Cho et al., 1999; Fowler et al., 2002; Insel and Hulihan, 1995; Williams et al., 1992; Witt et al., 1991) and it will be noted when data were collected using female subjects.”
BackgroundCellular Mechanisms of Social Attachment
Young, L. J., Lim, M. M., Gingrich, B., & Insel, T. R. (2001) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1006/hbeh.2001.1691 · Cited by 523 · cited 1×
“While existing data suggest that pair bond formation is mediated by co-activation of both oxytocin and D2-like DA receptors (Gingrich et al., 2000; Liu and Wang, 2003; Young et al., 2001), it is possible that they represent parallel systems that co-exist within the NAc.”
BackgroundAragona, B. J., Liu, Y., Yu, Y. J., Curtis, J. T., Detwiler, J. M., Insel, T. R., & Wang, Z. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1613 · Cited by 473 · cited 9×
“This review will focus on data collected from male subjects (Aragona and Wang, 2007; Aragona et al., 2003, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationWILLIAMS, J. (1992) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0018-506x(92)90004-f · Cited by 471 · cited 6×
“Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org August 2009 | Volume 3 | Article 15 | 3 stranger (Williams et al., 1992; Winslow et al., 1993).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialGetz, L. L., Carter, C. S., & Gavish, L. (1981) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00299829 · Cited by 466 · cited 1×
“This species was initially identifi ed as monogamous by fi eld studies which showed that male–female pairs travel together (Getz et al., 1981), share a nest with one or more litters of pups (Getz and Hofmann, 1986), and aggressively repel unrelated intruders from”
BackgroundRoitman, M. F., Wheeler, R. A., & Carelli, R. M. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.055 · Cited by 453 · cited 1×
“…DA transmission within the NAc is critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice behavior and…”
BackgroundRichfield, E. K., Penney, J. B., & Young, A. B. (1989) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(89)90168-1 · Cited by 448
Hedonic Hot Spots in the Brain
Peciña, S., Smith, K. S., & Berridge, K. C. (2006) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858406293154 · Cited by 441 · cited 1×
“This sub-region is critical for processing positive affect and unconditioned aspects of associative learning (Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007; Ikemoto, 2007; Pecina et al., 2006).”
BackgroundKrüeger, F., McCabe, K., Moll, J., Kriegeskorte, N., Zahn, R., Strenziok, M., Heinecke, A., & Grafman, J. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710103104 · Cited by 407 · cited 1×
“Humans display strong social preferences that are revealed through choice behavior in which people behave altruistically, act on a strong sense of fairness, and have tremendous capacities to trust (Krueger et al., 2007; Sanfey, 2007; Tankersley et al., 2007; Zak et al., 2004).”
BackgroundChampagne, F. A., Chretien, P., Stevenson, C. W., Zhang, T. Y., Gratton, A., & Meaney, M. J. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5322-03.2004 · Cited by 398
Romantic love: an fMRI study of a neural mechanism for mate choice.
Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2005) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20772 · Cited by 396 · cited 4×
“REWARD IN PRAIRIE VOLES AND HUMANS Interestingly, the neural regulation of mate choice in humans also involves DA signaling systems (Fisher et al., 2005).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLoewenstein, G. F., Rick, S. I., & Cohen, J. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093710 · Cited by 374
A critical role for nucleus accumbens dopamine in partner-preference formation in male prairie voles
Aragona, B. J., Liu, Y., Curtis, J. T., Stephan, F. K., & Wang, Z. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03483.2003 · Cited by 351 · cited 12×
“We next tested if pharmacological activation of DA receptors within the NAc was suffi cient to induce partner preference formation in the absence of mating (Aragona et al., 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationReal-time chemical responses in the nucleus accumbens differentiate rewarding and aversive stimuli
Roitman, M. F., Wheeler, R. A., Wightman, R. M., & Carelli, R. M. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2219 · Cited by 343 · cited 1×
“…DA transmission within the NAc is critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice behavior and…”
BackgroundDopaminergic-neuropeptide interactions in the social brain
Skuse, D. H., & Gallagher, L. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.007 · Cited by 340 · cited 3×
“Indeed, social decision-making in humans is so complex that it can appear to be the result of social cognition that is exclusive to our species (Skuse and Gallagher, 2009).”
BackgroundGingrich, B., Liu, Y., Cascio, C., Wang, Z., & Insel, T. R. (2000) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.114.1.173 · Cited by 339 · cited 4×
“…Robinson et al., 2002), microdialysis measures indicate that mating increases extracellular DA concentration within the NAc of female prairie voles (Gingrich et al., 2000) and tissue extraction studies show that mating also increases dopamine transmission (as indicated by dopamine turnover) in…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf, D. W., Genova, L. M., Hope, B. T., Barnhart, W. J., Spencer, J. J., & Nestler, E. J. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-05-01848.1998 · Cited by 325 · cited 1×
“…cAMP production can be studied by pharmacological blockade of cAMP binding sites on PKA using a cAMP analogue (Rp-cAMPS) whereas increased cAMP production is assessed using a cAMP analogue that binds PKA and releases its regulatory subunits (Sp-cAMPS) (Lynch and Taylor, 2005; Self et al., 1998).”
BackgroundVasopressin-dependent neural circuits underlying pair bond formation in the monogamous prairie vole
Lim, M. M., & Young, L. J. (2004) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.12.008 · Cited by 322 · cited 1×
“Many studies have demonstrated that male prairie voles paired with an estrogen-primed female for 24 h of mating reliably show partner preferences (Aragona et al., 2003; Lim and Young, 2004; Liu et al., 2001) (Figure 1C).”
BackgroundGame theory and neural basis of social decision making
Lee, D. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2065 · Cited by 316 · cited 3×
“Moreover, the fact that a rather large extent of the social organization of prairie voles can be largely explained by rather simple choice behaviors regulated by emotional processing may have very interesting implications for the study of social neuroeconomics (Cacioppo et al., 2000; Lee, 2008).”
BackgroundCarter, C. S., & Getz, L. L. (1993) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0693-100 · Cited by 310 · cited 1×
“Importantly, the monogamous behaviors observed in nature are also reliably expressed under laboratory conditions (Carter and Getz, 1993; Carter et al., 1995).”
BackgroundGeneralized Reciprocity in Rats
Rutte, C., & Michael Taborsky, A. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050196 · Cited by 290 · cited 2×
“Such behaviors are the result of selection processes that favored reciprocity among close social groups, in which it was adaptive for individuals to spend relatively small amounts of energy to help unrelated members of the group in order to receive relatively large benefi ts of the resulting social organization (Pfeif…”
BackgroundRobinson, D. L., Heien, M. L. A. V., & Wightman, R. M. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-23-10477.2002 · Cited by 290 · cited 2×
“…we have suggested that when pair bonded males in their natural environment encounter a novel female, DA is released in very high concentration (Robinson et al., 2002) suffi cient to activate low affi nity D1-like receptors (Richfi eld et al., 1989), especially since there appear to be a…”
BackgroundArbuthnott, G. W., & Wickens, J. R. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.12.003 · Cited by 287 · cited 1×
“(A) Cartoon based on (Arbuthnott and Wickens, 2007) showing the portion of the NAc shell where DA manipulations effect pair bond formation.”
BackgroundZAK, P. J., KURZBAN, R., & MATZNER, W. T. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1314.025 · Cited by 282 · cited 2×
“Humans display strong social preferences that are revealed through choice behavior in which people behave altruistically, act on a strong sense of fairness, and have tremendous capacities to trust (Krueger et al., 2007; Sanfey, 2007; Tankersley et al., 2007; Zak et al., 2004).”
BackgroundResultLiu, Y., Curtis, J. T., & Wang, Z. (2001) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.115.4.910 · Cited by 282 · cited 6×
“However, if male subjects cohabitate with females for only 6 h without mating, subjects show non- selective side-by-side contact and thus fail to show partner preferences (Aragona and Wang, 2007; Curtis and Wang, 2005; Liu et al., 2001) (Figure 1D).”
BackgroundInfluentialParental care and mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster
Thomas, J. A., & Birney, E. C. (1979) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00293304 · Cited by 244 · cited 4×
“Further, male prairie voles show high levels of parental care (Getz and Carter, 1996; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and it has been suggested that both parents are necessary for pup survival which selected for highly enduring pair bonds (Emlen and Oring, 1977; Kleiman, 1977; McGuire et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial organization in free-living prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster
Getz, L. L., & Hofmann, J. E. (1986) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00300004 · Cited by 239 · cited 3×
“, 1981), share a nest with one or more litters of pups (Getz and Hofmann, 1986), and aggressively repel unrelated intruders from INTRODUCTION In social contexts, decision-making is signifi cantly infl uenced by positive or negative concern for the welfare of others (Fehr and Camerer, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialDopamine Transmission in the Human Striatum during Monetary Reward Tasks
Zald, D. H., Boileau, I., El-Dearedy, W., Gunn, R., McGlone, F., Dichter, G. S., & Dagher, A. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4643-03.2004 · Cited by 238 · cited 1×
“Specifi cally, presentation of a picture of one’s partner increases activation of dopaminergic circuitry in a similar manner as that caused by monetary reward (Aron et al., 2005; Zald et al., 2004).”
ResultCalculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost–benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine
Phillips, P. E. M., Walton, M. E., & Jhou, T. C. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0626-6 · Cited by 237 · cited 1×
“…critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice behavior and decision-making (Phillips et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSexual activity increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of female rats
Pfaus, J. G., Damsma, G., Wenkstern, D., & Fibiger, H. C. (1995) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(95)00679-k · Cited by 236 · cited 2×
“Also consistent with studies conducted in rats (Becker et al., 2001; Pfaus et al., 1995; Robinson et al., 2002), microdialysis measures indicate that mating increases extracellular DA concentration within the NAc of female prairie voles (Gingrich et al., 2000) and tissue extraction studies show…”
BackgroundAragona, B. J., Cleaveland, N. A., Stuber, G. D., Day, J. J., Carelli, R. M., & Wightman, R. M. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2225-08.2008 · Cited by 234 · cited 1×
“However, it will be necessary for future studies to test this by measuring real-time DA transmission (Aragona et al., 2008; Day et al., 2007; Phillips et al., 2003) during prairie vole social interactions to determine if in vivo DA transmission is consistent with the behavioral pharmacology…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDynamic changes in nucleus accumbens dopamine efflux during the Coolidge effect in male rats
Fiorino, D. F., Coury, A., & Phillips, A. G. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-12-04849.1997 · Cited by 226 · cited 1×
“A necessary fi rst step in pair bond formation is that males must prefer their familiar partner over new mates, which is very unusual for males in most mammalian species since they reliably prefer to mate with novel females (Fiorino et al., 1997).”
BackgroundThe effects of stress on social preferences are sexually dimorphic in prairie voles.
DeVries, A. C., DeVries, M. B., Taymans, S. E., & Carter, C. S. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.21.11980 · Cited by 219 · cited 1×
“…2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005; Lim et al., 2004b; Liu et al., 2001; Winslow et al., 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995, 1996; Lim et al., 2007), estrogen (Cushing and Wynne-Edwards, 2006), glutamate and GABA (Curtis and Wang, 2005).”
BackgroundEvolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity
Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2988 · Cited by 217 · cited 2×
“Such behaviors are the result of selection processes that favored reciprocity among close social groups, in which it was adaptive for individuals to spend relatively small amounts of energy to help unrelated members of the group in order to receive relatively large benefi ts of the resulting social organization (Pfeif…”
BackgroundThe effects of social environment on adult neurogenesis in the female prairie vole
Fowler, C. D., Liu, Y., Ouimet, C. C., & Wang, Z. (2002) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.10042 · Cited by 212 · cited 1×
“However, there has been extensive work conducted on female prairie voles (Cho et al., 1999; Fowler et al., 2002; Insel and Hulihan, 1995; Williams et al., 1992; Witt et al., 1991) and it will be noted when data were collected using female subjects.”
BackgroundMcGuire, B., & Novak, M. A. (1984) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(84)80229-8 · Cited by 207 · cited 1×
“After mating, prairie voles remain together during gestation (McGuire and Novak, 1984; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and this facilitates a successful pregnancy (McGuire et al., 1992).”
The role of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and striatum during sexual behavior in the female rat
Becker, J. B., Rudick, C. N., & Jenkins, W. J. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-09-03236.2001 · Cited by 206 · cited 2×
“Also consistent with studies conducted in rats (Becker et al., 2001; Pfaus et al., 1995; Robinson et al., 2002), microdialysis measures indicate that mating increases extracellular DA concentration within the NAc of female prairie voles (Gingrich et al., 2000) and tissue extraction studies show…”
BackgroundWang, Z., Yu, G., Cascio, C., Liu, Y., Gingrich, B., & Insel, T. R. (1999) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.113.3.602 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“Consistent with data from female prairie voles (Gingrich et al., 2000; Wang et al., 1999), specifi c activation of D2-like receptors within the NAc shell (but not the NAc core) induced partner preferences in the absence of mating (Figure 3A).”
BackgroundAltruism is associated with an increased neural response to agency
Tankersley, D., Stowe, C. J., & Huettel, S. A. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1833 · Cited by 204 · cited 1×
“Humans display strong social preferences that are revealed through choice behavior in which people behave altruistically, act on a strong sense of fairness, and have tremendous capacities to trust (Krueger et al., 2007; Sanfey, 2007; Tankersley et al., 2007; Zak et al., 2004).”
BackgroundOliveras, D. M., & Novak, M. A. (1986) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(86)80120-8 · Cited by 196 · cited 1×
“As in their natural environment, male prairie voles show very high levels of parental care in the lab (Oliveras and Novak, 1986).”
BackgroundNuman, M., Numan, M. J., Pliakou, N., Stolzenberg, D. S., Mullins, O. J., Murphy, J. M., & Smith, C. D. (2005) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.119.6.1588 · Cited by 186
The emergence of consciousness in phylogeny.
Cabanac, M., Cabanac, A. J., & Parent, A. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.028 · Cited by 185 · cited 1×
“This supports the view that selection favored organisms that dealt with complex decisions by acting according to the degree of pleasure or displeasure likely to be associated with their behavioral response (Cabanac et al., 2009).”
BackgroundCentral and peripheral effects of oxytocin administration in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Witt, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Walton, D. M. (1990) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0091-3057(90)90042-g · Cited by 181 · cited 2×
“As pair bonding involves a myriad of cognitive and psychological processes, it is not surprising that a wide range of neural systems are important for its regulation including: oxytocin (Bales et al., 2007; Bamshad et al., 1993; Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Liu and Wang, 2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et a…”
BackgroundDiversity and Adaptation in Rodent Copulatory Behavior
Dewsbury, D. A. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188377 · Cited by 179 · cited 1×
“For instance, prairie voles preferentially mate with a familiar partner versus a novel conspecifi c (Dewsbury, 1975, 1987; Gray and Dewsbury, 1973).”
BackgroundGobrogge, K. L., Liu, Y., Jia, X., & Wang, Z. (2007) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21364 · Cited by 178 · cited 3×
“Pair bonded males also choose to aggressively reject potentially new mates (Aragona et al., 2006; Gobrogge et al., 2007).”
BackgroundBamshad, M., Novak, M. A., & De Vries, G. J. (1993) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.1993.tb00480.x · Cited by 175 · cited 1×
“…processes, it is not surprising that a wide range of neural systems are important for its regulation including: oxytocin (Bales et al., 2007; Bamshad et al., 1993; Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Liu and Wang, 2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005;…”
BackgroundModulation of pair bonding in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) by corticosterone.
DeVries, A. C., DeVries, M. B., Taymans, S. E., & Carter, C. S. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.17.7744 · Cited by 174 · cited 1×
“…2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005; Lim et al., 2004b; Liu et al., 2001; Winslow et al., 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995, 1996; Lim et al., 2007), estrogen (Cushing and Wynne-Edwards, 2006), glutamate and GABA (Curtis and Wang, 2005).”
BackgroundBehavioral and Electrophysiological Indices of Negative Affect Predict Cocaine Self-Administration
Wheeler, R. A., Twining, R. C., Jones, J. L., Slater, J. M., Grigson, P. S., & Carelli, R. M. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.024 · Cited by 171 · cited 1×
“…critical for important aspects of reward processing (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Roitman et al., 2005, 2008; Salamone and Correa, 2002; Wheeler et al., 2008) that may underlie cost-benefi t analyses related to choice behavior and decision-making (Phillips et al., 2007).”
BackgroundWang, Z., Hulihan, T. J., & Insel, T. R. (1997) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00617-3 · Cited by 169 · cited 5×
“While 24 h of mating increases selective aggression (Wang et al., 1997; Winslow et al., 1993), aggressive behavior is increased much more toward male intruders (compared to novel females) and male subjects do not chase or bite female intruders following 24 h of mating (Wang et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLim, M. M., Murphy, A. Z., & Young, L. J. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10973 · Cited by 163 · cited 5×
“…Bamshad et al., 1993; Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Liu and Wang, 2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005; Lim et al., 2004b; Liu et al., 2001; Winslow et al., 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995, 1996; Lim et al., 2007), estrogen (Cushing and…”
BackgroundInfluentialZeki, S., Goodenough, O. R., & Zak, P. J. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1544 · Cited by 163
Bamshad, M., Novak, M. A., & de Vries, G. J. (1994) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(94)90238-0 · Cited by 162 · cited 1×
“…including: oxytocin (Bales et al., 2007; Bamshad et al., 1993; Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Liu and Wang, 2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005; Lim et al., 2004b; Liu et al., 2001; Winslow et al., 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995,…”
BackgroundBales, K. L., Plotsky, P. M., Young, L. J., Lim, M. M., Grotte, N., Ferrer, E., & Carter, C. S. (2007) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.009 · Cited by 150 · cited 1×
“…and psychological processes, it is not surprising that a wide range of neural systems are important for its regulation including: oxytocin (Bales et al., 2007; Bamshad et al., 1993; Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Liu and Wang, 2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock…”
BackgroundMcGuire, B., Getz, L. L., Hofmann, J. E., Pizzuto, T., & Frase, B. A. (1993) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00183784 · Cited by 139 · cited 1×
“…voles show high levels of parental care (Getz and Carter, 1996; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and it has been suggested that both parents are necessary for pup survival which selected for highly enduring pair bonds (Emlen and Oring, 1977; Kleiman, 1977; McGuire et al., 1993; Wang and Novak, 1992).”
BackgroundNeurochemical regulation of pair bonding in male prairie voles
Wang, Z., & Aragona, B. J. (2004) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.08.024 · Cited by 128 · cited 3×
“Pair bond formation is a naturally occurring association formed between monogamous mates (Aragona et al., 2006; Wang and Aragona, 2004; Young and Wang, 2004) and associative learning is signifi cantly regulated by mesolimbic DA transmission (Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007; Kelley, 2004; Wise, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPorges, C. C., & Getz, L. (1996) · American Scientist · Cited by 122
The comparative psychology of monogamy.
Dewsbury, D. A. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 120
Wang, Z., & Novak, M. A. (1992) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.106.2.163 · Cited by 114 · cited 1×
“…voles show high levels of parental care (Getz and Carter, 1996; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and it has been suggested that both parents are necessary for pup survival which selected for highly enduring pair bonds (Emlen and Oring, 1977; Kleiman, 1977; McGuire et al., 1993; Wang and Novak, 1992).”
BackgroundAragona, B. J., & Wang, Z. (2004) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar.45.1.35 · Cited by 113 · cited 2×
“If subjects spend signifi cantly more time in side-by-side contact with partners over strangers (assessed by a t-test) then the group is said to show a partner preference (Aragona and Wang, 2004; Curtis and Wang, 2005; Liu et al., 2001).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEstrogen receptor‐α distribution in male rodents is associated with social organization
Cushing, B. S., & Wynne‐Edwards, K. E. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20826 · Cited by 101 · cited 1×
“…2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005; Lim et al., 2004b; Liu et al., 2001; Winslow et al., 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995, 1996; Lim et al., 2007), estrogen (Cushing and Wynne-Edwards, 2006), glutamate and GABA (Curtis and Wang, 2005).”
BackgroundThe effects of peptides on partner preference formation are predicted by habitat in prairie voles
Cushing, B. S., Martin, J. O., Young, L. J., & Carter, C. S. (2001) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1006/hbeh.2000.1633 · Cited by 99 · cited 2×
“THE PRAIRIE VOLE MODEL Prairie voles are small rodents (∼40 g) (Figure 1A) distributed primarily in the grasslands of the central United States (Cushing et al., 2001; Hall, 1981; Hoffmann and Koeppl, 1985).”
BackgroundCRF receptors in the nucleus accumbens modulate partner preference in prairie voles
Lim, M. M., Liu, Y., Ryabinin, A. E., Bai, Y., Wang, Z., & Young, L. J. (2007) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.006 · Cited by 99 · cited 3×
“, 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995, 1996; Lim et al., 2007), estrogen (Cushing and Wynne-Edwards, 2006), glutamate and GABA (Curtis and Wang, 2005).”
BackgroundOxytocin Receptor Binding in Female Prairie Voles: Endogenous and Exogenous Oestradiol Stimulation
Witt, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Lnsel, T. R. (1991) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.1991.tb00258.x · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“However, there has been extensive work conducted on female prairie voles (Cho et al., 1999; Fowler et al., 2002; Insel and Hulihan, 1995; Williams et al., 1992; Witt et al., 1991) and it will be noted when data were collected using female subjects.”
BackgroundLi, M., & Fleming, A. S. (2003) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.426 · Cited by 90 · cited 1×
“Additionally, DA transmission within the NAc shell is also important for mother–offspring bonds, which is an inherently rewarding social attachment (Champagne et al., 2004; Li and Fleming, 2003; Numan et al., 2005).”
BackgroundOxytocin Receptor Distribution Reflects Social Organization in Monogamous and Polygamous Voles
SHAPIRO, L. E., & INSEL, T. R. (1992) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb34380.x · Cited by 84 · cited 2×
“As pair bonding involves a myriad of cognitive and psychological processes, it is not surprising that a wide range of neural systems are important for its regulation including: oxytocin (Bales et al., 2007; Bamshad et al., 1993; Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Liu and Wang, 2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et a…”
BackgroundVentral tegmental area involvement in pair bonding in male prairie voles
CURTIS, J., & WANG, Z. (2005) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.022 · Cited by 74 · cited 8×
“…2003; Witt et al., 1990), vasopressin (Bamshad et al., 1994; Hammock and Young, 2005; Lim et al., 2004b; Liu et al., 2001; Winslow et al., 1993), corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1995, 1996; Lim et al., 2007), estrogen (Cushing and Wynne-Edwards, 2006), glutamate and GABA (Curtis and Wang, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Quantitative Description of Copulatory Behavior in Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Gray, G. D., & Dewsbury, D. A. (2008) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000124368 · Cited by 65 · cited 2×
“However, male prairie voles prefer to mate with a familiar female (Dewsbury, 1987) and the presentation of new females does not induce copulation in sexually satiated male prairie voles (Gray and Dewsbury, 1973).”
BackgroundJansson, A., Goldstein, M., Tinner, B., Zoli, M., Meador‐Woodruff, J. H., Lew, J., Levey, A. I., Watson, S. J., Agnati, L. F., & Fuxé, K. (1999) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00317-0 · Cited by 61 · cited 1×
“Similar to other rodent species (Jansson et al., 1999), prairie vole NAc is densely innervated by dopaminergic terminals arising from the ventral midbrain (Figure 2A) (Aragona et al., 2003; Curtis and Wang, 2005; Gobrogge et al., 2007).”
BackgroundReward system and addiction: what dopamine does and doesn’t do
Chiara, G. D., & Bassareo, V. (2007) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2007.02.001 · Cited by 59
McGuire, B., Russell, K., Mahoney, T. P. F., & Novak, M. A. (1992) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod47.1.37 · Cited by 51 · cited 1×
“After mating, prairie voles remain together during gestation (McGuire and Novak, 1984; Thomas and Birney, 1979) and this facilitates a successful pregnancy (McGuire et al., 1992).”
BackgroundLynch, W. J., & Taylor, J. R. (2005) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04305.x · Cited by 51 · cited 1×
“…cAMP production can be studied by pharmacological blockade of cAMP binding sites on PKA using a cAMP analogue (Rp-cAMPS) whereas increased cAMP production is assessed using a cAMP analogue that binds PKA and releases its regulatory subunits (Sp-cAMPS) (Lynch and Taylor, 2005; Self et al., 1998).”
BackgroundCacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.6.829 · Cited by 47 · cited 1×
“Moreover, the fact that a rather large extent of the social organization of prairie voles can be largely explained by rather simple choice behaviors regulated by emotional processing may have very interesting implications for the study of social neuroeconomics (Cacioppo et al., 2000; Lee, 2008).”
BackgroundBurns, P. D., Mendes, J. O. B., Yemm, R. S., Clay, C. M., Nelson, S. E., Hayes, S. H., & Silvia, W. J. (2001) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod65.4.1150 · Cited by 43
Opposing Regulation of Pair Bond Formation by cAMP Signaling within the Nucleus Accumbens Shell
Aragona, B. J., & Wang, Z. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3216-07.2007 · Cited by 42 · cited 10×
“This review will focus on data collected from male subjects (Aragona and Wang, 2007; Aragona et al., 2003, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPair bonding and ?the widow effect? in female prairie voles
Thomas, S. A., & Wolff, J. O. (2004) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2004.02.004 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“Indeed, the pair bond is so stable that a surviving member of the pair will not accept a new mate even if the other member of the bond is lost (Getz and Carter, 1996; Thomas and Wolff, 2004).”
BackgroundPair bonding and ?the widow effect? in female prairie voles
Thomas, S. J. (2004) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(04)00046-4 · Cited by 16
Cleaveland, N. A., Wightman, R. M., Carelli, R. M., et al. (2020) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/08af-kh69 · Cited by 13
Neurochemical regulation of pair bonding in male prairie voles
WANG, Z., & Aragona, B. J. (2004) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(04)00359-2 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Insel, T. R. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.005 · Cited by 1,044
Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior
Carter, C. S. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115110 · Cited by 714
“However, the dynamic interplay between these two peptides and a host of other molecules, such as dopamine (Aragona & Wang 2009, Young et al. 2011) and endogenous opioids (Burkett et al. 2011), supports social behaviors, especially in the face of challenge.”
BackgroundThe neurobiology of pair bonding: Insights from a socially monogamous rodent
Young, K. A., Gobrogge, K. L., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.07.006 · Cited by 389
“to maintain the existing pair bond [8,10] and to limit extra-pair copulations.”
Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine
Love, T. M. (2014) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.011 · Cited by 369
“Pair bonded males will then exhibit affiliative behavior towards their mates while expressing aggressive behavior towards strangers that can be blocked through antagonism of D1-like receptors within the nucleus accumbens (Aragona and Wang, 2009).”
InfluentialStress, social behavior, and resilience: Insights from rodents
Beery, A. K., & Kaufer, D. (2014) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.10.004 · Cited by 395
“Many studies have also investigated the role of the mesolimbic dopamine system and opioid regulation of rewarding social behaviors such as pair-bonds between mates (Aragona, 2009; Resendez et al., 2012); we describe these and additional research avenues throughout.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Aragona, B. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aragona, Brandon J.
- ORCID
- Aragona, Brandon J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 15-15
- ISSN
- 1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2729670
- OpenAlex
- W2004213341
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DAR01-19627, MHR01-58616, DAK02-23048)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dopamine, social choice, Microtus ochrogaster, monogamy, pair bonding, pair bond maintenance, reward processing, social decision-making, social preferences, emotional processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review