The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts
Open accessAbstract
Augmented reality (AR) has received increasing attention in the research literature as a fundamental pedagogical tool that can enhance learning at most educational levels. In academic contexts, this technology permits the superimposing of three-dimensional images onto the real environment. Although AR has been found to enhance learning in the academic environment, no systematic review of it has been conducted to identify, evaluate, and summarize empirical findings on its advantages and challenges in e-learning contexts. Hence, a systematic review of the research literature was conducted on the use of AR in e-learning contexts, with a focus on the key benefits and challenges related to its adoption and implementation. Electronic searches on databases, including Springer, Science Direct, EBSCO, and Google Scholar, were performed to retrieve relevant journal articles; 28 studies were included after they were screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The key benefits of using AR in e-learning included support of kinesthetic (tactile) learning, collaborative learning, distance/remote learning, learner-centered learning, and creative learning. Studies also reported that AR enhanced students’ engagement, motivation, attention/focus, interactivity, verbal participation, concentration, knowledge retention, and spatial abilities, as well as information accessibility. The findings suggest that challenges associated with AR in e-learning include information and cognitive overload, lack of experience in using the technology, resistance from teachers, complex technology, costly technology, and technical issues, such as connectivity problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent advances in augmented reality
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/38.963459 · Cited by 4,148
Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education
Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 · Cited by 2,674
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 · Cited by 2,463
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1 · Cited by 1,458
Gavish, N., Gutiérrez, T., Webel, S., Rodríguez, J., Peveri, M., Bockholt, U., & Tecchia, F. (2015) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.815221 · Cited by 680
Augmented Reality: An Overview
Carmigniani, J., & Furht, B. (2011) · Handbook of Augmented Reality · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_1 · Cited by 627
Augmented Reality in Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for Education
Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.654 · Cited by 514
Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Myth or Reality?
Elmqaddem, N. (2019) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9289 · Cited by 509
Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093 · Cited by 469
Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., Kazanidis, I., & Wells, D. (2019) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-018-0347-2 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Inclusive Augmented and Virtual Reality: A Research Agenda
Creed, C., Al-Kalbani, M., Theil, A., Sarcar, S., & Williams, I. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2247614 · Cited by 126
Aldeeb, F. H., Sallabi, O. M., Elaish, M. M., & Hwang, G. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12989 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Alzahrani, N. M.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-08-14
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5660
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3049237999
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app10165660
- The paper
- Alzahrani, N. M. (2020). Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.