Cited by 14Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training Studies

Optimizing Field Body Fat Percentage Assessment in Professional Soccer Players

Open access
Martinez-Ferran, Maria, Rafei, Eleh, Romero-Morales, Carlos, Pérez-Ruiz, Margarita, Lam-Meléndez, Alberto, Munguia-Izquierdo, Diego, Pareja-Galeano, Helios·2022·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Body composition is a determinant of performance in soccer. To estimate the body fat percentage (%BF), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is effective though this method is expensive and not readily accessible. This study examines the validity of widely used field methods based on anthropometric data and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Participants were 21 male Spanish First Division soccer players aged between 22 and 35 years. In each participant, body fat mass was determined by BIA and using 18 anthropometric equations including skinfold (SKF) measurements. DXA was used as reference. Correlation with DXA measurements was excellent for all equations and separate SKF measurements yet only moderate for BIA. However, only the equation recently developed for use in soccer players based on iliac crest and triceps SKFs showed no significant or standardized differences with DXA-derived %BF and these measurements also had the lowest bias. Our findings suggest that when DXA is not available, the best field method for %BF assessment in footballers is the equation based on iliac crest and triceps SKF. As another good option, we propose the sum of triceps, subscapular, supraspinal, and abdominal SKFs, as this combination also showed good correlation with DXA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app12020727

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several published studies point to a low correlation of FM results between BIA and DXA in professional soccer players, in contrast to some anthropometric formulas.

    “In addition, several published studies point to the existence of a low correlation of FM results between BIA and DXA in professional soccer players, in contrast to some anthropometric formulas [91,99], in agreement with the results of this work.”
  • Martínez-Ferran et al. found that the formula proposed by Suarez-Arrones et al., 2018, and the sum of four skinfolds had the highest agreement with DXA for assessing FM in professional soccer players.

    “Recently, Martínez-Ferran et al. tested 21 professional soccer players from the Spanish league to discover which FM formula and sum of skinfolds correlated best with DXA as the gold standard method when assessing FM. The formula proposed by Suarez-Arrones et al., 2018, and the sum of four skinfolds (triceps, subscapular, supraspinale, and abdominal) were found to have the highest agreement [99].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reilly, T.; Maughan, R.; Hardy, L. Body fat consensus statement of the steering groups of the British Olympic Association. Sport. Exerc. Inj. 1996, 2, 46-49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez-Ferran, M., Rafei, E., Romero-Morales, C., Pérez-Ruiz, M., Lam-Meléndez, A., Munguia-Izquierdo, D., & Pareja-Galeano, H.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
  • Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
  • Department of Health and Human Performance, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • CD Leganés Medical Services, 28918 Madrid, Spain
  • Physical Performance and Sports Research Center, Department of Sports and Computer Science, Section of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, Spain
  • Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Movement, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-12
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
727
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205344376
Cited by
14
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivo Digital UPM (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Burgos (University of Burgos) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
body fat percentage, soccer players, anthropometric equations, skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis, triceps skinfold thickness, body composition, professional football players

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review