Think global act local: The dependency of global lithium-ion battery emissions on production location and material sources
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract The pursuit of low-carbon transport has significantly increased demand for lithium-ion batteries. However, the rapid increase in battery manufacturing, without adequate consideration of the carbon emissions associated with their production and material demands, poses the threat of shifting the bulk of emissions upstream. In this article, a life cycle assessment (LCA)-inspired model is developed to account for battery material and energy demand contributions for the cradle-to-gate carbon footprint of lithium-ion batteries across the world’s dominant battery manufacturing locations. Analysis of published LCA data reveals a significant level of uncertainty associated with the carbon emissions of key battery materials, with the 95 % confidence interval for nickel and cobalt containing chemistries ranging from 40 to 90 kg CO2-eq kWh-1. The gate-to-gate carbon footprint of battery manufacturing is found to vary highly with predicted median values ranging between 0.15 and 94.5 kg CO2-eq kWh-1, depending on production location. Leading western-world battery manufacturing locations in the US and Europe, such as Kentucky and Poland are found to have comparable carbon emissions to Chinese rivals, even exceeding the carbon emissions of battery manufacturing in some Chinese provinces. Such resolution on material and energy contributions to the carbon footprint of batteries is essential to inform policy- and decision- making in order to minimise the carbon emissions of the battery value chain.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study develops a cradle-to-gate LCA and Monte Carlo model to quantify how battery material sources and production location affect lithium-ion battery carbon footprints across Chinese provinces, North America, Europe, and Asia. It finds material contributions vary by about a factor of 4 and that some Chinese provinces can match or beat Western locations, with global LIB industry emissions projected at 0.5–1.0 Gt CO₂-eq/year within the next decade.
Key findings
- Material contribution to cradle-to-gate CF varies by ca. a factor of 4 depending on production route and source; median material contributions are 64.3, 56.1, 47.4, 47.8 and 28.3 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹ for NMC111, NMC622, NMC811, NCA and LFP, respectively, with an arithmetic LIB average of 48.8 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹ (range 22–75.3).
- Gate-to-gate manufacturing CF median values range from 0.1 to 69.5 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹; examples include Sweden 2.8, Norway 1.6, Poland 39.6, Germany 21.9, Kentucky 47.2, Sichuan 12.0, Yunnan 8.7, Tianjin 69.5 and Jiangsu 59.9 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹.
- Cradle-to-gate median CFs are 57.5–118.4 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹ in Chinese provinces, 48.9–96.0 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹ across North America and 50.4–88.4 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹ in European battery manufacturing countries; Yunnan, Sichuan, Qinghai and Hubei have medians of 57.5–80.6 kg CO₂-eq kWh⁻¹.
- Global LIB industry emissions are projected to reach 0.5–1.0 Gt CO₂-eq per year within the next decade, with the upper bound comparable to Japan’s annual GHG emissions or the production emissions of 220 million internal combustion engine cars.
Methods
- A streamlined cradle-to-gate LCA follows ISO principles, with the functional unit set as 1 kWh of battery cell capacity; the foreground system includes cathode active material preparation, electrode preparation, cell production, assembly and conditioning, while the background system includes battery material production and energy sources. Use phase and end-of-life are excluded.
- Data include 53 sources for the CF of key battery materials (Li₂CO₃, LiOH, CoSO₄, MnSO₄, NiSO₄, FeSO₄, H₃PO₄, graphite, Al, Cu); production locations are based on the projected Gigafactory pipeline in 2035, covering 26 Chinese provinces, 20 North American locations and 19 countries in Europe and Asia.
- A Monte Carlo simulation generates 100,000 random numbers from uniform distributions for material CFs; gate-to-gate energy demand is assumed to vary between 40 and 80 kWh kWh⁻¹ cell and is multiplied by location-specific electricity carbon intensity, then combined with material contributions.
Limitations
- The paper states that material CFs are assumed to follow a uniform distribution, that market-share-based distributions are not possible due to scarce information, that some prevalent supply routes (e.g., Australian lithium, Indonesian nickel) are under-represented, and that results should be seen as indicative rather than definitive. It also excludes use phase, end-of-life, facility/equipment requirements, transport (noted as around 5% of overall CF) and materials below a 2% cut-off.
- The paper states that electricity emission factors are based on administrative boundaries, assuming a Gigafactory sources from the local grid; within-region variations (e.g., state-level Germany) are not fully accounted for, some locations may decarbonise faster, and the 2035 projection does not attribute specific plants to specific battery chemistries.
- Evident from the text: reliance on secondary data and LCA databases with different impact assessment methods may affect comparability, and no primary data are currently available for laterite-based nickel pathways or most spodumene-based lithium routes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 68 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The links between production location and the gate-to-gate carbon footprint of battery manufacturing are explored, with predicted median values ranging between 0.1 and 69.5 kg CO2-eq kWh-1.
“The links between production location and the gate-to-gate carbon footprint of battery manufacturing are explored, with predicted median values ranging between 0.1 and 69.5 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Depending on the carbon intensity of electricity grid mixes in each location as defined by the proportion of renewable energy versus fossil fuels, the contribution to the overall CF of a LIB can vary by an order of magnitude.
“Depending on the carbon intensity of electricity grid mixes in each location as defined by the proportion of renewable energy versus fossil fuels, the contribution to the overall CF of a LIB can vary by an order of magnitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
- Findingown data
An arithmetic average for all LIB chemistries is calculated with a median of 48.8 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 and whisker values ranging from 22 to 75.3 kg CO2-eq kWh-1.
“An arithmetic average for all LIB chemistries is also calculated with a median of 48.8 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 and whisker values ranging from 22 to 75.3 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In Europe, producing batteries in Sweden and Norway can come with a low median gate-to-gate CF of 2.8 and 1.6 kg CO2-eq kWh-1, respectively.
“In Europe, producing batteries in Sweden and Norway can come with a low median CF of 2.8 and 1.6 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 , respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
- Findingown data
The median material contribution to the cradle-to-gate CF for NMC111, NMC622, NMC811, NCA and LFP are 64.3, 56.1, 47.4, 47.8 and 28.3 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 for a cell of given capacity.
“The median values for NMC111, NMC622, NMC811, NCA and LFP are 64.3,56.1, 47.4, 47.8 and 28.3 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 for a cell of given capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given
The GHG footprint of material supply chains dominates the GHG emissions of the battery value chain.
“The GHG footprint of material supply chains is shown to dominate the GHG emissions of the battery value chain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, cradle-to-gate CF of LIB production varies widely based on location, energy sources, and material procurement.
“Overall, cradle-to-gate CF of LIB production varies widely based on location, energy sources, and material procurement”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Key battery manufacturing locations in Europe and North America do not favour GHG reduction.
“it is shown that key battery manufacturing locations in Europe and North America do not favour GHG reduction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study finds a significant level of uncertainty/variation in the carbon footprint of LIBs due to highly variable carbon footprints of upstream production of key battery materials.
“this study uncovers a significant level of uncertainty surrounding the CF of LIBs as a result of the highly variable CFs for the upstream production of key battery materials”
- Also stated in: § 5. Conclusions · plain
“This study uncovered a significant level of variation associated with the contribution of materials to the CF of market-dominant LIB chemistries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The CF of material production varies according to a uniform distribution.
- Also stated in: § 5. Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
The median cradle-to-gate CF varies between 60 and 120 kg CO2-eq kWh-1.
“The median cradle-to-gate CF varies between 60 and 120 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 as shown in Fig. 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The CF of material production varies according to a uniform distribution.
- Findingown data
The gate-to-gate contribution of battery manufacturing to the CF of LIBs exhibits a clear correlation to production location.
“The gate-to-gate contribution of battery manufacturing to the CF of LIBs exhibits a clear correlation to production location.”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Limitations and future perspectives · plain
“production location was found to be a determinant factor for the gate-to-gate CF of LIBs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4.3. Limitations and future perspectives · plain
- Findingown data
Several Chinese provinces can compete with western locations in terms of CF.
“However, and as a result of providing increased resolution when looking at the specifics of each manufacturing location, several Chinese provinces can compete with western locations in terms of CF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
LIBs produced in the province of Jiangsu, speculated to produce more batteries than the rest of the world combined, are found to come with a median gate-to-gate CF of 59.9 kg CO2-eq kWh-1.
“In addition, LIBs produced in the province of Jiangsu, speculated to produce more batteries than the rest of the world combined (Benchmark, 2022), are found to come with a median gate-to-gate CF of 59.9 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Benchmark, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
- Findingown data
The combined projected capacity of low-carbon manufacturing locations of Quebec, Ontario, Sweden, Switzerland and Norway does not exceed the expected LIB production capacity of Germany.
“The combined projected capacity of low-carbon manufacturing locations of Quebec, Ontario, Sweden, Switzerland and Norway does not exceed the expected LIB production capacity of Germany.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that, on average, the material contribution to the CF of a LIB can vary by approximately a factor of 4, depending on the type and source of battery materials.
“The Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that, on average, the material contribution to the CF of a LIB can vary by approximately a factor of 4, depending on the type and source of battery materials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The CF of material production varies according to a uniform distribution.
- Findingnone given
A significant variation is observed between Chinese provinces, with gate-to-gate CF median values ranging from 8.7 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 in Yunnan to 69.5 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 in Tianjin.
“A significant variation is observed between Chinese provinces, with gate-to-gate CF median values ranging from 8.7 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 in Yunnan to 69.5 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 in Tianjin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
- Findingreasoning
Key materials with significant CF uncertainties include NiSO4, CoSO4, Li2CO3, LiOH, and graphite.
“Key materials with significant CF uncertainties include NiSO 4 , CoSO 4 , Li 2 CO 3 , LiOH, and Gr.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The cradle-to-gate CF for South Korea ranges from 46.3 to 106.1 kg CO2-eq kWh-1.
“than the range of 46.3-106.1 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 reported here for South Korea”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With material supply chain decarbonisation and energy savings in battery manufacturing, a lower estimate of 0.5 Gt CO2-eq per year is possible.
“With material supply chain decarbonisation and energy savings in battery manufacturing, a lower estimate of 0.5 Gt CO 2 -eq per year is possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The electricity source is a strong link between the carbon footprint of a LIB and its production location.
“The electricity source is a strong link between the CF of a LIB and its production location (Kallitsis et al., 2020;Linder et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kallitsis et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Linder et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Given the current status quo, the global carbon footprint of the lithium-ion battery industry is projected to reach up to 1.0 Gt CO2-eq per year within the next decade.
“Given the current status quo, the global carbon footprint of the lithium-ion battery industry is projected to reach up to 1.0 Gt CO 2 -eq per year within the next decade.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The carbon footprint of key battery materials varies significantly depending on the type and ore grade at source and production location.
“it has become evident that their CF varies significantly depending on the type and ore grade at source and production location (Ali et al., 2023;Chordia et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
NMC, LFP and NCA battery manufacturing has been reported to consume approximately 30-50 kWh kWh cell-1 for the cell manufacturing process.
“NMC, LFP and NCA battery manufacturing has been reported to consume approximately 30-50 kWh kWh cell -1 for the cell manufacturing process (Jinasena et al., 2021;Kallitsis, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jinasena et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kallitsis, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Generally, producing nickel from sulphide ores comes with a lower CO2 intensity compared to laterite ores.
“Generally, producing nickel from sulphide ores comes with a lower CO 2 intensity compared to laterite ores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A more recent study by Degen et al. (2023) predicted energy consumption values for cell manufacturing in 2040 ranging from 20 to 40 kWh kWh cell-1.
“A more recent study by Degen et al. (2023) predicted energy consumption values for cell manufacturing in 2040 ranging from 20 to 40 kWh kWh cell -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Degen et al. (2023) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
According to GREET, producing NMC, NCA and LFP cathode precursor requires 20 to 30 kWh kWh cell-1.
“According to GREET producing NMC, NCA and LFP cathode precursor requires 20 to 30 kWh kWh cell -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites GREET
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The cradle-to-gate carbon footprint of LIBs in each location varies in line with different gate-to-gate contributions from battery manufacturing, which are traced to the local carbon intensity of electricity.
“Therefore, the cradle-to-gate CF of LIBs in each location varies in line with different gate-to-gate contributions from battery manufacturing, which are traced to the local carbon intensity of electricity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Material contributions to the carbon footprint of LIB manufacturing in each location remain unchanged; the variation in the carbon emissions of each key LIB material is independent of where battery manufacturing takes place.
- Premisecitation
Several Chinese provinces generate lower-carbon electricity than specific US states or European countries which are active sites in LIB production.
“several Chinese provinces generate lower-carbon electricity than specific US states or European countries which are active sites in LIB production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Both studies have represented China as a single entity which does not capture province-level variations within the world's largest battery manufacturing country.
“In addition, both studies have represented China as a single entity which does not capture province-level variations within the world's largest battery manufacturing country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The uncertainty associated with the carbon emissions of key battery materials is transferred to the cradle-to-gate CF of LIBs.
“This further highlights the uncertainty associated with the carbon emissions of key battery materials as shown in Fig. 2, which is transferred to the cradle-to-gate CF of LIBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A comprehensive data collection effort on the dominant supply chain of cobalt has revealed a carbon footprint for CoSO4 of 6.9-9.7 kg CO2-eq kg-1, depending on the allocation method.
“A comprehensive data collection effort on the dominant supply chain of cobalt has revealed a carbon footprint for CoSO 4 of 6.9-9.7 kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 , depending on the allocation method as it is almost always a co-product in other mineral systems (Dai et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dai et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The emissions from upstream material processing and battery manufacturing in 2035 are estimated to range between 0.5 and 1.0 Gt CO2-eq.
“The emissions from upstream material processing and battery manufacturing in 2035 are estimated to range between 0.5 and 1.0 Gt CO 2 -eq”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: All planned battery manufacturing capacity will materialise.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The range of CF values reported herein is representative of all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: A staged approach is assumed to reach 10 TWh battery manufacturing capacity in 2035.
- Premisecitation
Commonly quoted LIB CFs for European and North American locations portray best-case scenarios for locations such as Sweden or California.
“Commonly quoted LIB CFs for European and North American locations portray best-case scenarios for locations such as Sweden or California (Linder et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Linder et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The majority of the battery industry has optimised Gigafactory locations for costs, neglecting carbon emissions.
“By observing the findings of Fig. 4, it becomes evident that the majority of the battery industry has optimised Gigafactory locations for costs, neglecting carbon emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Such evidence challenges the notion that merely establishing a European or North American battery value chain provides sufficient means to decarbonise LIBs.
“Such evidence challenges the notion that merely establishing a European or North American battery value chain provides sufficient means to decarbonise LIBs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Oversimplified assumptions to represent the leading battery manufacturing country as a single entity in LCA studies have led to a skewed picture regarding the carbon emissions of battery manufacturing globally.
“Oversimplified assumptions to represent the leading battery manufacturing country as a single entity in LCA studies have led to a skewed picture regarding the carbon emissions of battery manufacturing globally.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Producing nickel from sulphide ores comes with a lower CO2 intensity compared to laterite ores.
“Generally, producing nickel from sulphide ores comes with a lower CO 2 intensity compared to laterite ores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The datasets analysed in this study might under-represent some prevalent supply routes, such as lithium production in Australia or nickel mining in Indonesia, due to limited data availability.
“It is important to note that the datasets analysed in this study might under-represent some prevalent supply routes, such as lithium production in Australia or nickel mining in Indonesia, due to limited data availability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
This is in line with published literature claiming that, on average, batteries manufactured in Europe or North America have a lower CF than those manufactured in China.
“This is in line with published literature claiming that, on average, batteries manufactured in Europe or North America have a lower CF than those manufactured in China (Kallitsis et al., 2020;Kelly et al., 2020;Linder et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The upper bound is quantitatively similar to the production GHG emissions of 220 million internal combustion engine cars.
“this upper bound is quantitatively similar to the production GHG emissions of 220 million internal combustion engine cars.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The upper bound of 1.0 Gt CO2-eq is comparable to the annual GHG emissions of Japan.
“with the upper bound being comparable to the annual GHG emissions of Japan.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Results falling outside of the whisker values of Fig. 5, such as 53 (Yu et al., 2018) or 20 (Xiong et al., 2019) kg CO2-eq kWh-1 for LIBs produced in China, have been reported to exhibit life cycle inventory inconsistencies.
“Results falling outside of the whisker values of Fig. 5, such as 53 (Yu et al., 2018) or 20 (Xiong et al., 2019) kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 for LIBs produced in China, have been reported to exhibit life cycle inventory inconsistencies (Kallitsis et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
- May combine two claims. 39
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAnalysis of published LCA data reveals significant uncertainty associated with the carbon emissions of key battery materials; their overall contribution to the carbon footprint of a LIB varies by a factor of ca. 4 depending on production route and source.
“Analysis of published LCA data reveals significant uncertainty associated with the carbon emissions of key battery materials; their overall contribution to the carbon footprint of a LIB varies by a factor of ca. 4 depending on production route and source.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLeading western-world battery manufacturing locations in the US and Europe, such as Kentucky and Poland, have comparable carbon emissions to Chinese rivals, even exceeding the carbon emissions of battery manufacturing in several Chinese provinces.
“Leading western-world battery manufacturing locations in the US and Europe, such as Kentucky and Poland are found to have comparable carbon emissions to Chinese rivals, even exceeding the carbon emissions of battery manufacturing in several Chinese provinces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationNiSO4 can be produced from sulphide and laterite ores, with the lower bound (1.8 kg CO2-eq kg-1) corresponding to production in Russia from sulphide ores and the upper bound (22.4 kg CO2-eq kg-1) providing an estimate for the conversion of nickel pig iron to matte.
“NiSO 4 can be produced from sulphide and laterite ores, with the lower bound (1.8 kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 ) corresponding to production in Russia from sulphide ores (Norilsk Nickel, 2022) and the upper bound (22.4 kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 ) providing an estimate for the conversion of nickel pig iron to matte, which could be further processed to NiSO 4 (IEA, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Norilsk Nickel, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- cites IEA, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe carbon footprint for LiOH varies between 5.5 and 19.2 kg CO2-eq kg-1 and that of Li2CO3 between 2.1 and 33 kg CO2-eq kg-1.
“The CF for LiOH varies between 5.5 and 19.2 kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 and that of Li 2 CO 3 between 2.1 and 33 kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBoth natural and synthetic graphite result in a high energy intensity, making their CF sensitive to regional electricity mixes, with the CF for natural graphite production predicted to be almost three times lower in North America, compared to China.
“Both products result in a high energy intensity, making their CF sensitive to regional electricity mixes, with the CF for natural graphite production predicted to be almost three times lower in North America, compared to China.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe values for MnSO4 are bounded between 0.7 and 4.8 kg CO2-eq kg-1, with the ones included in the Ecoinvent and GREET databases falling towards the lower end of the spectrum.
“The values for MnSO 4 are bounded between 0.7 and 4.8 kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 , with the ones included in the Ecoinvent and GREET databases falling towards the lower end of the spectrum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ecoinvent
Not checked in the free run.
- cites GREET
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe values in Fig. 2 range from 4 to 35.6 kg CO2-eq kg-1 for CoSO4, with the lower bound corresponding to a market-average from the Cobalt Institute and the upper bound being representative of both mining and refining processes taking place in China.
“However, the values in Fig. 2 range from 4 to 35.6 kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 , with the lower bound corresponding to a market-average from the Cobalt Institute (Cobalt Institute, 2019) and the upper bound being representative of both mining and refining processes taking place in China (Zhang et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cobalt Institute, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDepending on production location and the source of materials, median LIB carbon footprints of 57.5-118.4 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 are observed in Chinese provinces, 48.9-96.0 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 across North America and 50.4-88.4 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 in European battery manufacturing countries.
“Depending on production location and the source of materials, median LIB carbon footprints of 57.5-118.4kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 are observed in Chinese provinces, 48.9-96.0kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 across North America and 50.4-88.4kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 in European battery manufacturing countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Material contributions to the carbon footprint of LIB manufacturing in each location remain unchanged; the variation in the carbon emissions of each key LIB material is independent of where battery manufacturing takes place.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenKentucky is leading the way in North America in terms of projected pipeline capacity, with the median gate-to-gate CF estimated as 47.2 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 which is quantitatively similar to that of Zhejiang, with the latter expected to produce 563 GWh of LIBs by 2035.
“In addition, Kentucky is leading the way in North America in terms of projected pipeline capacity, with the median gate-to-gate CF estimated as 47.2 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 which is quantitatively similar to that of Zhejiang, with the latter expected to produce 563 GWh of LIBs by 2035.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe level of detail employed uncovers significant variations within Chinese provinces, with low carbon manufacturing locations being able to compete with European or North American locations in terms of GHG emissions.
“The level of detail employed herein uncovers significant variations within Chinese provinces, with low carbon manufacturing location being able to compete with European or North American location in terms of GHG emissions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPoland and Germany lead the way in terms of projected battery production capacity but use carbon-intensive electricity mixes leading to a much higher median gate-to-gate carbon footprint of 39.6 and 21.9 kg CO2-eq kWh-1, respectively.
“Meanwhile, Poland and Germany lead the way in terms of projected battery production capacity but use carbonintensive electricity mixes leading to a much higher median gate-togate carbon footprint of 39.6 and 21.9 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 , respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe projected battery manufacturing capacity of Yunnan, Sichuan, Qinghai and Hubei in 2035 is quantitatively similar to the combined capacity for all European countries, with the median CF of the former ranging from 57.5 to 80.6 kg CO2-eq kWh-1.
“The projected battery manufacturing capacity of Yunnan, Sichuan, Qinghai and Hubei in 2035 is quantitatively similar to the combined capacity for all European countries, with the median CF of the former ranging from 57.5 to 80.6 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Material contributions to the carbon footprint of LIB manufacturing in each location remain unchanged; the variation in the carbon emissions of each key LIB material is independent of where battery manufacturing takes place.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Chinese province of Sichuan is expected to produce the same amount of LIBs in 2035 as Germany and Poland combined, with a median gate-to-gate CF of 12.0 kg CO2-eq kWh-1.
“The Chinese province of Sichuan is expected to produce the same amount of LIBs in 2035 as Germany and Poland combined, with a median gate-to-gate CF of 12.0 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe production carbon footprint of a LIB is primarily made up of energy contributions, traced to cathode active material production and cell manufacturing, and material contributions associated with upstream mining/refining of key battery materials.
“The production CF of a LIB is primarily made up of energy contributions, traced to cathode active material production and cell manufacturing, and material contributions associated with upstream mining/refining of key battery materials (Chordia et al., 2021;Dai et al., 2019;Kallitsis et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationUnlocking the full climate benefit of electrification requires further decarbonisation of upstream LIB production.
“it is now evident that unlocking the full climate benefit of electrification requires further decarbonisation of upstream LIB production (Milovanoff et al., 2020;Peiseler et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBattery material production and large-scale LIB manufacturing are GHG emission hotspots in the battery life cycle.
“previously published evidence that has identified battery material production and large-scale LIB manufacturing as GHG emission hotspots in the battery life cycle (Chordia et al., 2021;Kallitsis, 2023;Peiseler et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrevious research has shown that batteries produced in China come with 26%-140% higher carbon footprint compared to those produced in Europe or the United States.
“Previous research has shown that batteries produced in China come with 26 %-140 % higher CF compared to those produced in Europe or the United States (Kallitsis et al., 2022a;Kelly et al., 2020;Linder et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kallitsis et al., 2022a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kelly et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Linder et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe LCA principles and framework (ISO, 2014, 2006) are followed to construct a model capable of predicting the carbon footprint of commonly used battery chemistries in electric vehicles.
“The LCA principles and framework (ISO, 2014(ISO, , 2006) ) are followed to construct a model capable of predicting the CF of commonly used battery chemistries in electric vehicles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites ISO, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites ISO, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCathode active material synthesis accounts for more than 50% of production costs, carbon footprint and environmental impacts.
“A recent study reported that cathode active material synthesis accounts for more than 50% of production costs, CF and environmental impacts (Gutsch and Leker, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gutsch and Leker, 2024 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningReported carbon footprints are calculated based on different impact assessment methods which exhibit methodological variations and would lead to slightly different estimations for the carbon footprint.
“Due to the utilisation of various sources, it is acknowledged that reported CFs are calculated based on different impact assessment methods which exhibit methodological variations and would lead to slightly different estimations for the CF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies by Kelly et al. (2020) and Winjobi et al. (2022) have relied on a single database, the GREET model, and focused on a single chemistry, NMC and its variations.
“Studies by Kelly et al. (2020) and Winjobi et al. (2022) have explored regional variations on the CF of LIBs based on market-dominant battery manufacturing supply chains.However, both studies have relied on a single database, the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transport (GREET) model, and focused on a single chemistry, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) and its”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe LCA model is streamlined by neglecting any facility and equipment requirements.
“The LCA model is streamlined by neglecting any facility and equipment requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe battery use phase and end-of-life are beyond the scope of this study.
“The battery use phase and end-of-life are important steps in the battery life cycle (Gutsch and Leker, 2024;Lander et al., 2021), however their assessment is beyond the scope of this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSpecific states within the United States and Canada have fundamentally different carbon intensities of their regional energy supply which has a direct effect on the carbon footprint of battery production.
“specific states within the United States and Canada have fundamentally different carbon intensities of their regional energy supply which has a direct effect on the CF of battery production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile spodumene-based pathways tend to be more GHG intensive due to their energy and carbon intensity, producing lithium products from low grade brines can reach similar climate impacts.
“While spodumene-based pathways tend to be more GHG intensive due to their energy and carbon intensity, producing lithium products from low grade brines can reach similar climate impacts (Chordia et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chordia et al., 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe impact assessment is only focused on the carbon footprint, which is used here to represent the 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP).
“The impact assessment is only focused on the CF, which is used here to represent the 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP) (IPCC, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IPCC, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe carbon footprint of LIBs depends not only on the source of battery materials and the location where battery manufacturing takes place, but also on the battery chemistry, as different types of materials and energy densities affect the material demand to produce LIBs.
“The CF of LIBs depends not only on the source of battery materials and the location where battery manufacturing takes place, but also on the battery chemistry, as different types of materials and energy densities affect the material demand to produce LIBs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe key battery-manufacturing Chinese province of Sichuan has a carbon intensity of 0.2 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 for its electricity, which is comparable to Portugal, and Germany has a higher carbon intensity than the Yunnan province (0.37 vs 0.14 kg CO2-eq kWh-1).
“the key battery-manufacturing Chinese province of Sichuan has a carbon intensity of 0.2 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 for its electricity, which is comparable to Portugal, and Germany has a higher carbon intensity than the Yunnan province (0.37 vs 0.14 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 ) (Li et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTransport has been found to contribute around 5% to the overall carbon footprint of LIBs, therefore not expected to lead to significant differences across scenarios.
“The latter has been found to contribute around 5% to the overall CF of LIBs (Linder et al., 2023), therefore not expected to lead to significant differences across scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Linder et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe material demand is based on the study of Winjobi et al. (2020), which includes bills-of-materials for a wide range of battery chemistries which are inherently consistent, calculated based on the BatPac tool for all chemistries (Ahmed et al., 2016).
“the sole reliance on the study of Winjobi et al. (2020) is that it includes bills-of-materials for a wide range of battery chemistries which are inherently consistent, i.e. they are calculated based on the BatPac tool for all chemistries (Ahmed et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Winjobi et al. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ahmed et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKey cathode materials used in LFP battery manufacturing, FeSO4 and H3PO4, come with significantly lower CFs and are included here for completeness based on data from GREET and Ecoinvent.
“Key cathode materials used in LFP battery manufacturing, FeSO 4 and H 3 PO 4 , come with significantly lower CFs and are included here for completeness based on data from GREET and Ecoinvent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites GREET
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ecoinvent
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSulphide ore is mined in locations with lower carbon intensity energy, such as Canada and Russia, in contrast with Indonesia, New Caledonia and the Philippines being the dominant laterite mining countries, heavily relying on coal.
“sulphide ore is mined in locations with lower carbon intensity energy, such as Canada and Russia, in contrast with Indonesia, New Caledonia and the Philippines being the dominant laterite mining countries, heavily relying on coal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenGraphite mining and surface modification are the main energy demand drivers for natural graphite, while the graphitization stage is the main energy requirement in the production of synthetic graphite.
“Graphite mining and surface modification are the main energy demand drivers for natural graphite, while the graphitization stage is the main energy requirement in the production of synthetic graphite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe notably lower values for LFP are attributed to the fact that LFP cathode precursor manufacturing requires significantly lower amounts of materials, while key cathode materials FeSO4 and H3PO4 come with significantly lower CFs.
“The notably lower values for LFP are attributed to the fact that LFP cathode precursor manufacturing requires significantly lower amounts of materials (Fig. 1), while key cathode materials FeSO 4 and H 3 PO 4 , come with significantly lower CFs (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNickel laterites need to either be smelted completely or be hydrometallurgically processed resulting in increased process complexity and energy intensity.
“Specifically, nickel laterites need to either be smelted completely or be hydrometallurgically processed resulting in increased process complexity and energy intensity (Schmidt et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGraphite has been reported as a 'hidden impact' in battery manufacturing due to the underestimation of its CF in commercial LCA databases.
“graphite has been reported as a “hidden impact” in battery manufacturing due to the underestimation of its CF in commercial LCA databases (Whattoff et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whattoff et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent LCAs for natural and synthetic graphite reported values of 9.6 and 20.6 kg CO2-eq kg-1, respectively, which are much higher than earlier-reported numbers.
“Recent LCAs for natural and synthetic graphite reported values of 9.6 (Engels et al., 2022) and 20.6 (Surovtseva et al., 2022) kg CO 2 -eq kg -1 , respectively, which are much higher than earlier-reported numbers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Engels et al., 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Surovtseva et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCobalt is mainly mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which is further processed to CoSO4 in China.
“Cobalt is mainly mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which is further processed to CoSO 4 in China.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAluminium sulphate is extensively utilised in NCA precursor production, quantified as primary Al demand herein, known to come with significant geographical variations, with production in China associated with a carbon intensity three-times higher than that of Europe.
“Aluminium sulphate is extensively utilised in NCA precursor production, quantified as primary Al demand herein, known to come with significant geographical variations, with production in China associated with a carbon intensity three-times higher than that of Europe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCobalt mining in the DRC heavily relies on hydroelectric power, resulting in a low carbon intensity, with the carbon emissions of cobalt being traced to the refining step, usually performed in China.
“Cobalt mining in the DRC heavily relies on hydroelectric power, resulting in a low carbon intensity, with the carbon emissions of cobalt being traced to the refining step, usually performed in China.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe projection in Fig. 6 should be seen as a worst-case scenario, as it extrapolates today's technologies to 2035, not accounting for further improvements in battery manufacturing and LIB technology.
“In addition, Fig. 6 should be seen as a worst-case scenario, as it extrapolates today's technologies to 2035, not accounting for further improvements in battery manufacturing and LIB technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe results should be seen as indicative rather than definitive, given the large set of assumptions.
“Given that performing a study with such a broad scope comes with a large set of assumptions, our results should be seen as indicative rather than definitive”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe European Commission will require CF disclosures for any battery placed on the market from 2024.
“the European Commission will require CF disclosures for any battery placed on the market from 2024 (Peiseler et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peiseler et al., 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChordia et al. (2021) reported a cradle-to-gate CF of 104 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 for an NMC811 battery produced in South Korea, which falls towards the upper whisker values reported in Fig. 5.
“Chordia et al. (2021) reported a cradle-to-gate CF of 104 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 for an NMC811 battery produced in South Korea, which falls towards the upper whisker values reported in Fig. 5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chordia et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenCertain locations might decarbonise at a much faster pace, which would result in a lower carbon intensity of battery manufacturing as shown in Fig. 4.
“It is also acknowledged that certain locations might decarbonise at a much faster pace, which would result in a lower carbon intensity of battery manufacturing as shown in Fig. 4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIt is even harder to trace the origin of key battery materials, which are a determinant factor to the overall environmental impact of a battery.
“In addition, it is even harder to trace the origin of key battery materials, which are a determinant factor to the overall environmental impact of a battery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent study found that Gigafactory energy consumption could be reduced up to 66% by 2040 by switching to post-LIB chemistries and improving production technologies, which would have an important effect on the CF.
“A recent study found that Gigafactory energy consumption could be reduced up to 66% by 2040 by switching to post-LIB chemistries and improving production technologies, which would have an important effect on the CF (Degen et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Degen et al., 2023 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKelly et al. (2020) tried to tackle such issue by building hypothetical scenarios on specific supply chains without defining a specific manufacturer for each battery cell.
“Kelly et al. (2020) tried to tackle such issue by building hypothetical scenarios on specific supply chains without defining a specific manufacturer for each battery cell.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kelly et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDai et al. (2019) reported a 72.9 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 for an NMC111 battery produced in the United States, falling within the lower whisker values reported for North America in Fig. 5.
“Dai et al. (2019) reported a 72.9 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 for an NMC111 battery produced in the United States, falling within the lower whisker values reported for North America in Fig. 5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dai et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe probability to utilise some material supply routes might be higher compared to others.
“However, the probability to utilise some material supply routes might be higher compared to others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSignificantly higher CF values reported by Kallitsis et al. (2020) and Ellingsen et al. (2014), than the range of 46.3-106.1 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 reported here for South Korea, have been traced to the fact that they refer to pilot-scale facilities rather than Giga-scale factories considered herein, with the former resulting in almost three-times higher energy demand for cell manufacturing.
“Significantly higher CF values reported by Kallitsis et al. (2020) and Ellingsen et al. (2014), than the range of 46.3-106.1 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 reported here for South Korea, have been traced to the fact that they refer to pilot-scale facilities rather than Giga-scale factories considered herein, with the former resulting in almost three-times higher energy demand for cell manufacturing (Kallitsis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe issues highlighted uncover a significant omission in current battery LCA studies in the literature hindering our ability to perform accurate assessments, with high relevance to the EU battery regulation.
“The issues highlighted above uncover a significant omission in current battery LCA studies in the literature hindering our ability to perform accurate assessments, with high relevance to the EU battery regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenDefining only the chemistry and geometry of a battery cell, without discussing manufacturer-specific information does not allow to trace the specifics of the battery cell manufacturing location.
“Defining only the chemistry and geometry of a battery cell, without discussing manufacturer-specific information does not allow to trace the specifics of the battery cell manufacturing location.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation278 million personal and commercial vehicles were registered in the US in 2021.
“278 million personal and commercial vehicles were registered in the US in 2021 (Tilford and Megna, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tilford and Megna, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAllocating a specific market share for Li chemicals for spodumene versus brine pathways would not be correct under the current literature landscape, as most data for spodumene-based routes present estimations based on secondary data.
“allocating a specific market share for Li chemicals for spodumene versus brine pathways would not be correct under the current literature landscape, as most data for spodumene-based routes present estimations based on secondary data (Chordia et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chordia et al., 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBalancing authorities span several states in the US or provinces in China and some Gigafactories might be exclusively powered by renewable energy, which would change the location-specific emission profile.
“Practically, balancing authorities span several states in the US or provinces in China and some Gigafactories might be exclusively powered by renewable energy, which would change the location-specific emission profile.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The gate-to-gate energy demand range of 40-80 kWh/kWh cell is representative for all battery chemistries.
“This range of values is assumed to be representative for all battery chemistries, as there is currently no specific trend regarding the comparative energy consumption of competing chemistries, as highlighted by Bouter and Guichet (2022).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All energy requirement can be represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.
“All energy requirement is represented as electricity values, although it includes heating and cooling.This is an accepted assumption across literature studies but might slightly underestimate the CF (Jinasena et al., 2021).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Material contributions to the carbon footprint of LIB manufacturing in each location remain unchanged; the variation in the carbon emissions of each key LIB material is independent of where battery manufacturing takes place.
“Material contributions to the CF of LIB manufacturing in each location were assumed to remain unchanged.In other words, it is assumed that the variation in the carbon emissions of each key LIB material is independent of where battery manufacturing takes place.This assumption is backed by the fact that materials supply chains are globally distributed.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The CF of material production varies according to a uniform distribution.
“Such analysis is performed under the assumption that the CF of material production varies according to a uniform distribution.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All planned battery manufacturing capacity will materialise.
“Such projection assumes that all planned battery manufacturing capacity will materialise.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The range of CF values reported herein is representative of all battery chemistries.
“assuming that the range of CF values reported herein is representative of all battery chemistries.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A Gigafactory positioned at a specific location will source electricity from the local grid.
“assuming that a Gigafactory positioned at a specific location will source electricity from the local grid.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A staged approach is assumed to reach 10 TWh battery manufacturing capacity in 2035.
“assuming a staged approach to reach 10 TWh battery manufacturing capacity in 2035.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using generic and highly aggregated LCI obscure the range of climate change impacts of LIB cells.
“However, using generic and highly aggregated LCI obscure the range of climate change impacts of LIB cells.97”
From Current and Future Impacts of Lithium Carbonate from Brines: A Global Regionalized Life Cycle Assessment Model (2025) · cites this paper as [97]
The production of battery materials and subsequent LIB cell manufacturing contribute considerably to greenhouse gas emissions.
“the production of battery materials4–7 and the subsequent LIB cell manufacturing8–10 contribute considerably to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions”
From Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
The materials' impact and induced variance on battery carbon footprint have not yet been quantified.
“While initial research has begun to aggregate the CF data points of individual battery materials into a battery-level analysis6,24, the materials’ impact and induced variance on battery CF have not yet been quantified.”
From Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Battery material carbon footprint distributions are not systematically integrated into battery carbon footprint analyses.
“Second, battery material CF distributions are not systematically integrated into battery CF analyses.”
From Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Both types of graphite are produced in China, where the electricity mix has an emissions intensity of 0.95 kg CO2-equiv kWh−1, varying substantially across graphite hubs-from 0.68 in Gansu to 1.14 in Anhui.
“Moreover, both types of graphite are produced in China (Table 1), where the electricity mix has an emissions intensity of 0.95 kg CO2-equiv kWh 1 , varying substantially across graphite hubs-from 0.68 kg CO2-equiv kWh 1 in Gansu province to 1.14 kg CO2-equiv kWh 1 in Anhui.”
From Decarbonizing lithium-ion battery primary raw materials supply chain (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Car-production emissions comparison overstates the car count
MinorAt 5 t CO 2-eq per car, the stated upper bound of 1.0 Gt corresponds to 0.2 billion, or 200 million, cars-not 220 million. Producing 220 million cars at that rate would emit 1.1 Gt.
Reported 220 · recomputed 0.2
“However, assuming that producing an average gasoline-powered car emits 5t CO 2 -eq (Buberger et al., 2022;Gifford, 2021), this upper bound is quantitatively similar to the production GHG emissions of 220 million internal combustion engine cars.”
Conclusion omits reported median footprints below 60
MinorThe conclusion gives 60 kg CO 2-eq kWh -1 as the lower end of the median range, but the results report medians as low as 48.9 in North America and 50.4 in Europe.
“The median cradle-to-gate CF varies between 60 and 120 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 as shown in Fig. 5.”
“median LIB carbon footprints of 57.5-118.4kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 are observed in Chinese provinces, 48.9-96.0kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 across North America and 50.4-88.4kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 in European battery manufacturing countries.”
Cites
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · doi:10.1017/9781009157896 · Cited by 6,972 · see citing works
Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries
Ciez, R. E., & Whitacre, J. F. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0222-5 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries
Xu, C., Dai, Q., Gaines, L., Hu, M., Tukker, A., & Steubing, B. (2020) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Degen, F., Winter, M., Bendig, D., & Tübke, J. (2023) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01355-z · Cited by 861 · see citing works
The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters – A review
Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., Zimmermann, B., Braun, J., & Weil, M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions
International Energy Agency (2021) · doi:10.1787/f262b91c-en · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Circular economy strategies for electric vehicle batteries reduce reliance on raw materials
Baars, J., Domenech, T., Bleischwitz, R., Melin, H. E., & Heidrich, O. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00607-0 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
(2013) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/11367.1614-7502 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Nordelöf, A., Messagie, M., Tillman, A.-M., Ljunggren Söderman, M., & Van Mierlo, J. (2014) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0788-0 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications
Dai, Q., Kelly, J. C., Gaines, L., & Wang, M. (2019) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries5020048 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time
Knobloch, F., Hanssen, S. V., Lam, A., Pollitt, H., Salas, P., Chewpreecha, U., Huijbregts, M. A. J., & Mercure, J.-F. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Global implications of the EU battery regulation
Melin, H. E., Rajaeifar, M. A., Ku, A. Y., Kendall, A. M., Harper, G. D. J., & Heidrich, O. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abh1416 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Total CO2-equivalent life-cycle emissions from commercially available passenger cars
Buberger, J., Kersten, A., Kuder, M., Eckerle, R., Weyh, T., & Thiringer, T. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112158 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets
Milovanoff, A., Posen, I. D., & MacLean, H. L. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00921-7 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Gutsch, M., & Leker, J. (2024) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122132 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Berger, K., Schöggl, J.-P., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131492 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Engels, P., Cerdas, F., Dettmer, T., Frey, C., Hentschel, J., Herrmann, C., Mirfabrikikar, T., & Schueler, M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130474 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Yu, A., Wei, Y., Chen, W., Peng, N., & Peng, L. (2018) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.009 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Environmental Life Cycle Implications of Upscaling Lithium-Ion Battery Production
Chordia, M., Nordelöf, A., & Ellingsen, L. A.-W. (2021) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-021-01976-0 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationLander, L., Kallitsis, E., Hales, A., Edge, J. S., Korre, A., & Offer, G. J. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116737 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationKallitsis, E., Korre, A., Kelsall, G., Kupfersberger, M., & Nie, Z. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120067 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationLife cycle assessment of recycling options for automotive Li-ion battery packs
Kallitsis, E., Korre, A., & Kelsall, G. H. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133636 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobally regional life cycle analysis of automotive lithium-ion nickel manganese cobalt batteries
Kelly, J. C., Dai, Q., & Wang, M. (2020) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-019-09869-2 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Schmidt, T., Buchert, M., & Schebek, L. (2016) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.017 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Toward a life cycle inventory for graphite production
Surovtseva, D., Crossin, E., Pell, R. S., & Stamford, L. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13234 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Regionalized life cycle assessment of present and future lithium production for Li-ion batteries
Schenker, V., Oberschelp, C., & Pfister, S. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106611 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Chordia, M., Wickerts, S., Nordelöf, A., & Arvidsson, R. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106634 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards more flexibility and transparency in life cycle inventories for Lithium-ion batteries
Crenna, E., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P., & Hischier, R. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105619 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Comparative life cycle energy and GHG emission analysis for BEVs and PhEVs: a case study in China
Xiong, S., Ji, J., & Ma, X. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12050834 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Assessing the feasibility of the Inflation Reduction Act’s EV critical mineral targets
Trost, J. N., & Dunn, J. B. (2023) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-023-01079-8 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Nuttah, M. M., Roma, P., Nigro, G. L., & Perrone, G. (2023) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2023.100456 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Best practices for life cycle assessment of batteries
Peters, J. F. (2023) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-023-01067-y · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Winjobi, O., Kelly, J. C., & Dai, Q. (2022) · Sustainable materials and technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00415 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Bouter, A., & Guichet, X. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130994 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Jinasena, A., Burheim, O. S., & Strømman, A. H. (2021) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries7010014 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
China’s electricity emission intensity in 2020 – an analysis at provincial level
Li, X., Chalvatzis, K., & Pappas, D. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.421 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Zhang, T., Bai, Y., Shen, X., Zhai, Y., Ji, C., Ma, X., & Hong, J. (2021) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-021-01925-x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Toward a European carbon footprint rule for batteries
Peiseler, L., Bauer, C., Beuse, M., Wood, V., & Schmidt, T. S. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abp9505 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
On the energy use of battery Gigafactories
Kallitsis, E. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132573 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationAnalysis of nickel sulphate datasets used in lithium-ion batteries
Ali, A.-R., Lackner, J., Cerdas, F., & Herrmann, C. (2023) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.059 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Safe and sustainable lithium-ion batteries
Kallitsis, E., Lander, L., Edge, J., et al. (2022) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25561/95548 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2021, vol. 283
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials
Peiseler, L., Schenker, V., Schatzmann, K., Pfister, S., Wood, V., & Schmidt, T. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54634-y · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Decarbonizing lithium-ion battery primary raw materials supply chain
Istrate, R., Mas-Fons, A., Beylot, A., Northey, S., Vaidya, K., Sonnemann, G., Kleijn, R., & Steubing, B. (2024) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2024.10.003 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Abdolrasol, M. G. M., Ansari, S., Sarker, I. A., Tiong, S. K., & Hannan, M. A. (2025) · Progress in Energy · doi:10.1088/2516-1083/adbff0 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Schenker, V., & Pfister, S. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c12619 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Risks of mineral resources in the supply of renewable energy batteries
Jia, S., Meng, W., & Li, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94848-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Li, X., Li, X., Chen, G., Zhang, D., Tian, L., Chen, J., Liu, C., Li, B., Tiraferri, A., & Liu, B. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143554 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Husmann, J., Beylot, A., Perdu, F., Pinochet, M., Cerdas, F., & Herrmann, C. A. (2024) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.001 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ali, A.-R., Derin, D., Blömeke, S., & Herrmann, C. A. (2025) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2025.05.010 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Liu, F., Shafique, M., & Luo, X. (2024) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.06.001 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Premathilake, D. S., Ambaye, T. G., Botelho, A. B., Lima, A. T., Espinosa, D. C. R., & Vaccari, M. (2024) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.015 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Hadad, S., Pope, M. A., Kamkar, M., & Tam, K. C. (2024) · Advanced Sustainable Systems · doi:10.1002/adsu.202400532 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Simas, M., Bly, K., Arega, M. A., Aponte, F. R., Silva, T. L., & Wiebe, K. S. (2025) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108294 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Premathilake, D. S., Illankoon, W. A. M. A. N., Botelho, A. B., Milanese, C., Tenório, J. A. S., Espinosa, D. C. R., & Vaccari, M. (2025) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c09084 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Evaluating Carbon Emissions: A Lifecycle Comparison Between Electric and Conventional Vehicles
Malik, F. H., Ayadi, W., Hussain, G. A., Haider, Z. M., Alkhatib, F., & Lehtonen, M. (2025) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj16050287 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Climate change and global energy transformation: The role of renewable energy and electric vehicles
Al-Shetwi, A. Q., Sujod, M. Z., Mahafzah, K. A., Abuelrub, A., Al‐Masri, H. M. K., & Hannan, M. A. (2026) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181521 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Shahverdian, M. H., Soltanifar, F., Sohani, A., Sayyaadi, H., & Hoseinzadeh, S. (2025) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.116111 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Rethinking Sustainable Batteries
Au, H., Ribadeneyra, M. C., Edge, J. S., Lander, L., Kendrick, E., & Titirici, M. (2025) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202502829 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationTournaviti, M., Michailidou, A. V., Savva, C., & Vlachokostas, C. (2025) · Future Batteries · doi:10.1016/j.fub.2025.100047 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Electric Vehicle Battery Remanufacturing: Circular Economy Leadership and Workforce Development
Chigbu, B. I., Nekhwevha, F., & Umejesi, I. (2024) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj15100441 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Environmental impact assessment of α-spodumene production from Lithium mining in Australia
Setu, S., & Strezov, V. (2025) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108601 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zhou, W., Xie, R., Tong, X., Xie, X., Wang, X., & Zhao, Z. (2025) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2025.107418 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Carbon tax and trading mechanisms for emission reduction in the Indonesian power sector
Sunanda, W., Setyonegoro, M. I. B., Hadi, S. P., & Sarjiya, S. (2025) · Cleaner Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.clet.2025.101024 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Feng, Y., Feng, D., Sun, X., Liu, Z., Li, W., & Wang, P. (2025) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c03739 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Toward Energy Justice Principles for Sustainable Lithium‐Ion Battery Technologies
Stephens, I. D. R., Lindsay, J. J., Pell, R., Slater, P. R., & Kendrick, E. (2025) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202500042 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationGreen and economically viable dry-electrode manufacturing for high-energy-density lithium batteries
Cao, K., Ji, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, K., Zeng, L., Wang, L., & He, X. (2025) · Energy storage materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104649 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Li, J., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Lan, S., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143756 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Eloranta, V., Inkeri, E., Ropo, M., Sihvonen, V., Jaatinen‐Värri, A., Luoranen, M., Salmelin, M., Hosseinpour, N., & Grönman, A. (2025) · IET Generation Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/gtd2.70037 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Grave to Cradle: A Direct Recycling Approach for Over‐Discharged LiFePO 4 Electric Vehicle Cells
Driscoll, E. H., Kallitsis, E., Marco, J. F., Burnett, D., Pham, S. T., Sommerville, R. P. Z., Cooper, L., Edge, J. S., Berry, F. J., Slater, P. R., et al. (2025) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202500174 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationChordia, M., Wikner, E., Nordelöf, A., Vaidya, K., & Arvidsson, R. (2025) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.70125 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationJieun-Cha, Vu, T. T., Junhyung-Seo, Seungu-Cho, Yeongeun-Choi, & Daesung-Song (2025) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107262 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sreedhar, S., Shanmugam, G., Gunasekaran, C., & Venkatesan, M. (2025) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d5ta07680c · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Basnet, M. R., Gardiner, J. A., & Wang, H. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.137236 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The importance of chemical reagents for the electric vehicle battery supply chain
Istrate, I.-R., Peiseler, L., & Schenker, V. (2026) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d5gc05122c · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Thorne, R. J., Ellingsen, L. A., Lai, S. Y., Laasri, F., Safa, S., Chameh, B., Hu, H., Lehto, V., Ji, X., & Nordelöf, A. (2026) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-026-00908-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Brancaleoni, P. P., Corti, E., Rossi, A., Ravaglioli, V., Brusa, A., & Cavina, N. (2026) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.155412 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dirty Bits in Low-Earth Orbit: The Carbon Footprint of Launching Computers
Ohs, R., Stock, G. F., Schmidt, A., Fraire, J. A., & Hermanns, H. (2025) · ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review · doi:10.1145/3757892.3757896 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Qin, Q., Adeboye, L., Ibrahim, K. A., Luk, P. C. K., Xie, Y., Verdin, P. G., Luo, Z., & Huang, L. (2025) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.124398 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Measuring the spillover effects of policy uncertainty on China’s lithium supply chain
Yang, L., Fu, J., & Zhu, Y. (2025) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2025.2557576 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Jamatia, T., Pechancová, V., Paul, D., Buchgeister, J., Baumann, M., Ersoy, H., Erakca, M., & Saha, P. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115110 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Jebabalan, S. K., & Dennison, M. S. (2026) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-026-03203-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
van de Ven, J. J. M. M., Teeuwisse, P. J., Hendrikx, R. W. A., Yang, Y., & Abrahami, S. T. (2025) · Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy · doi:10.1007/s40831-025-01098-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dissolution of Lithium Contained in Lepidolite Using Ascorbic Acid: Kinetic and Modeling Analysis
Ordóñez, S., Reyes, I. A., Patiño, F., Islas, H., Reyes, M., Labra, M. P., Tapia, J. C. J., & Flores, M. U. (2024) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma17225447 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Philippot, M. L., Güney, E., Dammala, P. K., Dermenci, K. B., Yuca, N., Mierlo, J. V., Berecibar, M., & Messagie, M. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144645 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Performance-Driven Battery Pack Sizing for Light-Duty Electric Vehicles
López-Pérez, M., Domínguez-Zenteno, J., Valencia‐Palomo, G., López‐Estrada, F., Gómez‐Peñate, S., & Santos‐Ruiz, I. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3585754 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hybrid Thermal and Electrical Energy Storage in Office Buildings
Galteland, O., Tommasini, D., Sæterli, R., & Salgado‐Beceiro, J. (2025) · Lecture notes in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97755-8_16 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hybrid Renewable Energies for CO2 Reduction: a Steel Industry Paradigm
Panagiotopoulou, V. C., Gkoumas, G., & Stavropoulos, P. G. (2025) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.098 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Domingues, A. M., & de Souza, R. G. (2026) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2026.104889 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhao, R., Yu, X., Zhou, X., Deng, L., Pu, L., & Fang, J. (2026) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2026.124475 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Operando Impedance Signatures of Lithium-Ion Battery Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation
Tyree, D., Su, H., Mao, N., & Zhou, X. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19081895 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yin, Y., Tian, G., & Jin, Y. (2026) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2026.141279 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Harmonisation of life cycle assessment practices in horizon Europe battery technology projects
Pinto, S. M., Soares, M., Lourenço, E. J., Glans, E., Zackrisson, M., Fransson, K., Mendoza, G., Ormazabal, G., Cerrillo, C., Ali, A.-R., et al. (2026) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108574 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Performance Analysis of Innovative Propulsion Systems for Short-Haul Ferries
Ravaglioli, V., Brancaleoni, P. P., Ferretti, A. N. D., Corti, E., Moro, D., & Silvagni, G. (2025) · Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · doi:10.1115/1.4069732
Zeferino, E. F. S., Rumpel, M., Yang, S., & Thiede, S. (2025) · Energy storage materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104694
A Hybrid Protocol for Reliable and Green Operation of Multigateway LoRa Networks
Valkanis, A., Beletsioti, G. A., Kantelis, K. F., Nicopolitidis, P., Papadimitriou, G. I., & Louta, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2025.3639186
Explainable Surrogate Modeling for Process-Sensitive Battery Manufacturing LCAPreprint
Kim, S. H., & Bang, S. S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6045180
Husmann, J., Haupt, J., Silva, G. V., & Herrmann, C. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8285103/v1
Jayadevan, A., Pulluru, M., Duggapogu, E., Madukkuri, S., Erabhoina, H., & Mandava, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2026.1630913
Effect of recycled content on the environmental footprint of new EV batteries
Hanna, F., Yuan, L., Arsenault, R., & Anctil, A. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128993
Yi, X., & Huo, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8654596/v1
Eloranta, V., Inkeri, E., Luoranen, M., & Grönman, A. (2026) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1588/1/012001
Husmann, J., & Herrmann, C. A. (2026) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-026-02591-7
Insights into Electrified Aviation: The Pros and Cons
Behara, S., Jones, L., & Reddy, M. A. (2026) · CHAIN · doi:10.23919/chain.2026.000002
Carbon Footprint of China’s Typical Electric Vehicle Batteries: A Data-Driven Approach
Yu, R., Li, Y., Yang, X., Li, P., Li, J., & Qian, G. (2026) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj17040184
Lischka, G., & Tober, W. (2026) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2026-01-0457
Automating life cycle inventory modelling with large language models
Kallitsis, E., Offer, G. J., & Edge, J. S. (2026) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2026.05.044
Self-citationInvestigating Lithium‐Ion Battery Electrode Drying Using Physics‐based Modeling
Alanazi, S., Rabbani, A., Wilson, M. C. T., & Jabbari, M. (2026) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.202502090
Sustainability of battery electric vehicles
Gohari, S., Yay, A. S. E., Zheng, Y., Sorouri, H., & Oshnoei, A. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29210-1.00143-6
Framework and drivers for sustainable life cycle management of electric vehicle batteries
Hitt, C., Busta, E., Wallington, T. J., Kim, H. C., & Keoleian, G. A. (2026) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2026.123094
Shukla, S., Shen, K., Iyer, R. K., & Kelly, J. C. (2026) · Environmental Science Advances · doi:10.1039/d5va00190k
Economic and environmental impacts of frequency reserve participation for a building PV–BESS system
Eloranta, V. (2026) · International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) · doi:10.1109/eem68581.2026.11589782
Holistic material-manufacturing environmental assessment of Li-Ion batteries
Panesar, A. S., & Mbuthu, J. M. (2026) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108607
Lithium-ion batteries in vehicle applications and perspectives on sustainable management
Shqairat, A., Chagnes, A., Marangé, P., & Liarte, S. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-40612-6.00015-8
Chen, J., Lai, X., Chen, Q., Niu, Y., Zhang, W., Zheng, Y., Li, Y., & Yu, G. (2026) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2026.124464
Zhu, X., Fu, K., Qiu, Y., Tan, G., Chen, T., & Han, Y. (2026) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110757
Xiang, Z., & Pan, Z. (2026) · Future Batteries · doi:10.1016/j.fub.2026.100209
Economic and environmental right-sizing of battery-electric haulage fleets in open-pit mines
Matsui, K., Macias, J. J. E., & Angeloudis, P. (2026) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.149346
Husmann, J., Haupt, J., Silva, G. V., & Herrmann, C. (2026) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s44498-026-00169-y
Zhang, Y., Fan, C., Jiang, J., & Ye, B. (2026) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-026-02749-3
Castro, F., Lezama, F., Soares, J., de Lima, T. D., & Vale, Z. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-41867-8_18
Zhou, H., Li, W., Wang, P., Singh, P. J., & Meng, F. (2026) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2026.101863
Glans, E., Rowe, S. H., Fransson, K., Ali, A.-R., Herrmann, C., Zackrisson, M., Offer, G. J., Edge, J. S., & Kallitsis, E. (2026) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.109203
Self-citationGong, W., Ouyang, Y., Gu, Y., Yang, Z., Hu, X., Yang, D., & Gao, X. (2026) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.109222
- Authors
- Kallitsis, E., Lindsay, J. J., Chordia, M., Wu, B., Offer, G. J., & Edge, J. S.
- Affiliations
- The Faraday Institution (GB)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Kallitsis, Evangelos
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 449
- Pages
- 141725
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392630758
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 12
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The Faraday Institution
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
- Keywords
- lithium-ion batteries, carbon footprint, production site, battery materials, cradle-to-gate emissions, battery value chain, low-carbon transportation, CO2 emissions projections, Chinese provinces, North America, Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review