Cited by 12Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Preliminary study of efficacy and safety of self-administered virtual exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder vs. Cognitive-behavioral therapy

Open access
Stefaniak, Izabela, Hanusz, Krzysztof, Mierzejewski, Paweł, Bieńkowski, Przemysław, Parnowski, Tadeusz, Murawiec, Sławomir·2022·Brain Sciences

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most frequent mental disorders. Exposure to virtual reality can be a solution complementing standard CBT (cognitive-behavioral therapy) or can be used as an independent therapeutic tool. The study’s objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of using self-administered virtual reality exposure vs. CBT and CBT with virtual exposure. We assessed the efficacy of the applied intervention with the Leibowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). We compared three groups: CBT (n = 25), CBT + VR (n = 29), and self-administered therapy without aid of a therapist (n = 19). The results indicated that all three groups showed changes on the LSAS. The simple effect analysis showed that there were no differences between experimental conditions at T0 (session 1) and T1 (session 9) and that the only significant difference occurred at T2 (session 14). The pairwise comparisons showed that the participants in the VR condition scored higher on the LSAS score during the measurement at T2 than participants in CBT condition. Our study has several limitations. The presented initial study shows that the methods of CBT for social anxiety used so far are also effective, while the VR tool for self-therapy requires further research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci12091236

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an RCT comparing CBT with VRET, CBT alone, and self-administered VRET in SAD patients, SAD symptoms significantly decreased in both CBT + VRET and CBT conditions, and these improvements were greater than in the self-administered VRET group.

    “SAD symptoms significantly decreased in both the CBT + VRET and CBT conditions, and these improvements were greater than in the self-administered VRET group.”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Stefaniak et al., 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Self-guided VRET is inferior to CBT in reducing social anxiety symptoms post-treatment.

    “Stefaniak et al. (2022) found self-guided VRET to be inferior to CBT in reducing social anxiety symptoms post-treatment”
  • Self-guided VRET has significantly higher drop-out rates compared to therapist-led VRET.

    “and reported significantly higher drop-out rates in self-guided VRET comparted to therapist-led VRET.”
  • Apart from public speaking, job interviews comprised a considerable amount of exposure situations in VRET studies.

    “Apart from public speaking situations, job interviews comprised a considerable amount of exposure situations (e.g., Bouchard et al., 2017; Stefaniak et al., 2022; Kampmann et al., 2016b).”
  • VRET studies have used locations such as cafés, public transport, stores, and hallways.

    “Where the tasks exceeded public speaking situations, cafés (Klinger et al., 2005; Geraets et al., 2019), public transport (Stefaniak et al., 2022; Geraets et al., 2019), stores (Bouchard et al., 2017; Klinger et al., 2005; Geraets et al., 2019), or hallways (Bouchard et al., 2017; Klinger et al., 2005) served as locations in VR for conducting the exposures.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Clark D.M. Wells A. A cognitive model of social phobia Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment Heimberg R.G. Liebowitz M.R. Hope D.A. Schneier F.R. Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 1995 69 93
  2. [40]Michael B.F. Williams J.B.W. Benjamin L.S.B. Spitzer R.L. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders SCID-II American Psychiatric Press Washington, DC, USA 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stefaniak, I., Hanusz, K., Mierzejewski, P., Bieńkowski, P., Parnowski, T., & Murawiec, S.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology (PL)
  • Institute of Psychology (PL)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
  • Dialogue Therapy, 02-791 Warsaw, Poland
Corresponding author
Stefaniak, Izabela
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-13
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
1236
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295845735
Cited by
12
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Centre for Research and Development and Tomorrow Ltd. within the “Fast Track” program (POIR.01.01.01-00-0636/16-00)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, virtual reality exposure therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, self-administered therapy, treatment efficacy, treatment safety, virtual reality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review