Cited by 150Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Virtual reality therapy in social anxiety disorder

Open access
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G., Meyerbröker, Katharina, Morina, Nexhmedin·2020·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview of current methods and important aspects to consider when applying virtual worlds in the treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD). RECENT FINDINGS: Different aspects such as dialogs between avatars and patients have been investigated as well as virtual audiences, emotional facial expression, and verbal interaction with avatars. Results of these studies are promising. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) in SAD. Unfortunately, most RCTs into the efficacy of VRET in comparison with exposure in vivo in SAD have been conducted with a combination of cognitive interventions and VRET. No differences between these conditions were found, but the pure effect of VRET as a stand-alone treatment has only been investigated in one RCT, wherein VRET was not superior to exposure in vivo. Current research into different facets of SAD and VRET has produced promising results with respect to technological aspects. No differences in efficacy between cognitive behavior therapy and VRET were found, but there is a clear need for studies investigating the efficacy of VRET as a stand-alone treatment and the therapeutic processes involved before this therapy can be disseminated in routine clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-020-01156-1

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amplifying standard VRET with interventions aimed at modifying dysfunctional attentional biases in SAD does not appear to result in additional clinical change and provides no incremental advantage to VRET.

    “amplifying standard VRET with interventions aimed at modifying dysfunctional attentional biases in SAD does not appear to result in additional clinical change and provides no incremental advantage to VRET”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Emmelkamp et al., 2020

    The Attention Bias section (page not available) reports disappointing results for attention-bias modification in SAD and says a VR-based task did not change attentional bias, with most participants showing no clinical improvement. It does not compare standard VRET with VRET augmented by attention-bias interventions, so the claimed lack of incremental advantage is not established. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Social anxiety disorder: recognition, assessment and treatment of social anxiety disorder. (Clinicalguideline159.). 2013. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG159. 31869048
  2. [49]Meyerbröker K Emmelkamp PMG Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a systematic review of process-and-outcome studies Depress Anxiety 2010 27 933 944 10.1002/da.20734 20734361 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Meyerbröker, K., & Morina, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2020-05-13
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
32-32
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W3024886852
Cited by
150
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
University of Amsterdam
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, social anxiety disorder, avatars, virtual audience, facial expressions, exposure therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Emotions, Fear, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review