Cited by 63Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsMicrobial Inactivation Methods

Alternating Electric Fields (TTFields) Activate Cav1.2 Channels in Human Glioblastoma Cells

Open access
Neuhaus, Eric, Zirjacks, Lisa, Ganser, Katrin, Klumpp, Lukas, Schüler, Uwe, Zips, Daniel, Eckert, Franziska, Huber, Stephan M.·2019·Cancers

Abstract

Tumor treating fields (TTFields) represent a novel FDA-approved treatment modality for patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. This therapy applies intermediate frequency alternating electric fields with low intensity to the tumor volume by the use of non-invasive transducer electrode arrays. Mechanistically, TTFields have been proposed to impair formation of the mitotic spindle apparatus and cytokinesis. In order to identify further potential molecular targets, here the effects of TTFields on Ca2+-signaling, ion channel activity in the plasma membrane, cell cycle, cell death, and clonogenic survival were tested in two human glioblastoma cell lines in vitro by fura-2 Ca2+ imaging, patch-clamp cell-attached recordings, flow cytometry and pre-plated colony formation assay. In addition, the expression of voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channels was determined by real-time RT-PCR and their significance for the cellular TTFields response defined by knock-down and pharmacological blockade. As a result, TTFields stimulated in a cell line-dependent manner a Cav1.2-mediated Ca2+ entry, G1 or S phase cell cycle arrest, breakdown of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential and DNA degradation, and/or decline of clonogenic survival suggesting a tumoricidal action of TTFields. Moreover, inhibition of Cav1.2 by benidipine aggravated in one glioblastoma line the TTFields effects suggesting that Cav1.2-triggered signaling contributes to cellular TTFields stress response. In conclusion, the present study identified Cav1.2 channels as TTFields target in the plasma membrane and provides the rationale to combine TTFields therapy with Ca2+ antagonists that are already in clinical use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers11010110

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Neuhaus et al., anti-clonogenicity was significant but low at 10% after 5-7 days.

    “They noted that anti-clonogenicity was significant but low at 10% after 5–7 days [46].”

    From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Neuhaus et al. showed correlation of AEF effects on Cav1.2 channels with previously reported TTFields effects, but not causation.

    “In summary, Neuhaus et al. showed correlation of AEF effects on Cav1.2 channels with previously reported TTFields’ effects, but not causation, probably due to low AEF field strength and use of a single-direction electric field [46].”

    From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • The low efficacy in Neuhaus et al. is probably due to the lower field strength (1 V/cm) compared to the 2-3 V/cm needed for higher efficacy, and to the use of a single-direction electric field.

    “The low efficacy is probably due to the lower field strength (1 V/cm in Neuhaus et al. [46]) compared to what Kirson et al. [47] showed is needed for higher efficacy: 2–3 V/cm [47]. The latter setting resulted in a reduction in cancer cell number [47]. Neuhaus et al. also did not change the AEF direction with respect to the cells, which significantly increases efficacy as demonstrated by Kirson et”

    From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • 200 kHz AEFs at 1 V/cm (TTFields) affected a voltage-gated calcium channel (Cav1.2) in T98 human glioblastoma cells and produced apoptosis as well as G1 or S phase cell cycle arrest, breakdown of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential, and DNA degradation.

    “For example, using several empirical techniques, Neuhaus et al. [46] showed that 200 kHz AEFs at 1 V/cm (i.e., TTFields) affected a voltage-gated calcium channel (Cav1.2) in T98 human glioblastoma cells and produced apoptosis as well as G1 or S phase cell cycle arrest, breakdown of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential, and DNA degradation [46].”

    From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Ion channel activation and ion influx, and perhaps other effects such as cytoskeleton damage, can be used as biomarkers of responsiveness to TTFields.

    “The results from electroporation studies further support that ion channel activation and ion influx, and perhaps other effects such as cytoskeleton damage, can be used as biomarkers of responsiveness to TTFields, given that these phenomena are observed after exposure to electric fields [27,46,62,65].”

    From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neuhaus, E., Zirjacks, L., Ganser, K., Klumpp, L., Schüler, U., Zips, D., Eckert, F., & Huber, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Huber, Stephan M.
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-18
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
110
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909570965
Cited by
63
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Krebshilfe (70112872 / 70113144)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
tumor treating fields, CaV1.2 channels, voltage-gated calcium channels, glioblastoma, calcium signaling, cell cycle arrest, mitochondrial membrane potential, clonogenic survival, benidipine, calcium channel blockers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review