Cited by 235Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsSirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 84 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Senescence and Cancer: A Review of Clinical Implications of Senescence and Senotherapies

Open access

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a key component of human aging that can be induced by a range of stimuli, including DNA damage, cellular stress, telomere shortening, and the activation of oncogenes. Senescence is generally regarded as a tumour suppressive process, both by preventing cancer cell proliferation and suppressing malignant progression from pre-malignant to malignant disease. It may also be a key effector mechanism of many types of anticancer therapies, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapies, both directly and via bioactive molecules released by senescent cells that may stimulate an immune response. However, senescence may contribute to reduced patient resilience to cancer therapies and may provide a pathway for disease recurrence after cancer therapy. A new group of drugs, senotherapies, (drugs which interact with senescent cells to interfere with their pro-aging impacts by either selectively destroying senescent cells (senolytic drugs) or inhibiting their function (senostatic drugs)) are under active investigation to determine whether they can enhance the efficacy of cancer therapies and improve resilience to cancer treatments. Senolytic drugs include quercetin, navitoclax, and fisetin and preclinical and early phase clinical data are emerging of their potential role in cancer treatments, although none are yet in routine use clinically. This article provides a review of these issues.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review summarizes how cellular senescence is both tumour-suppressive and potentially tumour-promoting, and how therapy-induced senescence may affect cancer treatment response, recurrence, and patient resilience. It reviews emerging senotherapies—senolytics and senostatics—as potential adjuncts to cancer therapy, noting that none are yet in routine clinical use.

Key findings

  • Senescence is generally tumour suppressive by preventing proliferation and blocking progression from premalignant to malignant disease, but chronic senescent cells release SASP factors that may promote tumour recurrence, progression, inflammation, and fibrosis.
  • Therapy-induced senescence is common: in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant CAF chemotherapy, 41% of tumours stained by senescence markers versus 10% of untreated cases; Adriamycin treatment for 5 days induced 60% of breast cancer cells to become senescent.
  • Senotherapies include senolytics (e.g., quercetin, navitoclax, fisetin) and senostatics (e.g., metformin); preclinical and early-phase data suggest potential to enhance cancer therapy and reduce frailty, but none are in routine clinical use.
  • Navitoclax is limited by toxicity, especially thrombocytopenia; dasatinib plus quercetin reduces senescent cells in models and improved physical dysfunction and lifespan in aged mice; fisetin is roughly twice as potent as quercetin, with an average daily dietary intake of 0.4 mg and a phase 2 trial using 20 mg/kg orally for 2 days.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review of the clinical implications of senescence and senotherapies in cancer.
  • Data/sample: published literature on senescence biology, cancer prognosis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, surgery, frailty, and senotherapies, including preclinical mouse models and human cancer studies; no primary patient cohort is reported.
  • Main analysis: narrative synthesis with summary tables; no systematic search strategy, meta-analysis, or formal quality appraisal is described.

Limitations

  • Stated: the interactions between senescence and cancer are “complex and poorly understood,” and more research is needed to clarify them.
  • Stated: variation in SASP composition means findings may not be extrapolated to other cancers or treatment types; no senotherapies are yet approved for clinical use, and there are no published studies of senotherapies on acute wound healing.
  • Evident: as a narrative review, it does not describe a systematic literature search or formal evidence grading, and many cited data are preclinical, small, or early-phase.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers12082134

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 84 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 42 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 38
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from mouse models of senescence and senotherapy are informative for human cancer treatment.

    “This principle was elegantly demonstrated in a mouse model, where the implantation of senescent cells into young mice induced physical dysfunction, which spread beyond the injected senescent cells and reduced lifespan.”
    “In a separate study, again in a mouse model, the elimination of senescent cells by the use of dasatinib and quercetin, reduced the impact of radiotherapy, improved cardiac function and exercise tolerance and increased life expectancy [90].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Senescence biomarkers used in human studies reliably identify senescent cells in tumours.

    “The detection of senescence is complicated, as many of the molecules involved in senescence signalling are also oncogenes or tumour suppressors that may be up or down regulated as part of the carcinogenic process.”
    “The assessment of combinations of markers is therefore required in addition to a marker of proliferation, such as Ki67.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Long-term survivors of cancer have increased rates of frailty and reduced longevity.

    “It is already recognised that long-term survivors of cancer have increased rates of frailty and reduced longevity”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some of the increased frailty and reduced longevity in long-term cancer survivors is due to direct and indirect induction of senescent cells by cancer therapies (chemotherapy and radiotherapy).

    “some of which are thought to be due to the direct and indirect induction of senescent cells by cancer therapies (chemotherapy and radiotherapy).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Treatments such as surgery and chemotherapy have a significant negative impact on physical function, with studies showing an increase in measures of frailty after treatment, which may never recover back to baseline levels.

    “It is well recognized that treatments such as surgery and chemotherapy have a significant negative impact on physical function, with studies showing an increase in measures of frailty after treatment, which may never recover back to baseline levels.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This loss of function is one of the reasons that older patients require longer hospital admission after surgery and sometimes require social care support in the longer term after surgery.

    “This loss of function is one of the reasons that older patients require longer hospital admission after surgery and sometimes require social care support in the longer term after surgery.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Physical dysfunction is a major burden on both the NHS and social care resources and is a research priority for the UK government.

    “This physical dysfunction is therefore a major burden on both the NHS and social care resources and is a research priority for the UK government.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 125 references

2 of the 125 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 235

Metadata

Authors
Wyld, L., Bellantuono, I., Tchkonia, T., Morgan, J., Turner, O., Foss, F., George, J., Danson, S., & Kirkland, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Wyld, Lynda
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-07-31
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
2134
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046779484
Cited by
235
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2018-04-002)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG062413)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Keywords
cellular senescence, senotherapy, senolytics, cancer therapy resistance, tumor suppression, telomere shortening, DNA damage, oncogene activation, tumor recurrence, quercetin, navitoclax, fisetin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review