Cited by 95Algal biology and biofuel productionBioenergy crop production and managementBiodiesel Production and Applications

Biofuel Production in Ireland-An Approach to 2020 Targets with a Focus on Algal Biomass

Open access
Murphy, Fionnuala, Devlin, Ger, Deverell, Rory, McDonnell, Kevin·2013·Energies

Abstract

Under the Biofuels Obligation Scheme in Ireland, the biofuels penetration rate target for 2013 was set at 6% by volume from a previous 4% from 2010. In 2012 the fuel blend reached 3%, with approximately 70 million L of biodiesel and 56 million L of ethanol blended with diesel and gasoline, respectively. Up to and including April 2013, the current blend rate in Ireland for biodiesel was 2.3% and for bioethanol was 3.7% which equates to approximately 37.5 million L of biofuel for the first four months of 2013. The target of 10% by 2020 remains, which equates to approximately 420 million L yr−1. Achieving the biofuels target would require 345 ktoe by 2020 (14,400 TJ). Utilizing the indigenous biofuels in Ireland such as tallow, used cooking oil and oil seed rape leaves a shortfall of approximately 12,000 TJ or 350 million L (achieving only 17% of the 10% target) that must be either be imported or met by other renewables. Other solutions seem to suggest that microalgae (for biodiesel) and macroalgae (for bioethanol) could meet this shortfall for indigenous Irish production. This paper aims to review the characteristics of algae for biofuel production based on oil yields, cultivation, harvesting, processing and finally in terms of the European Union (EU) biofuels sustainability criteria, where, up to 2017, a 35% greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction is required compared to fossil fuels. From 2017 onwards, a 50% GHG reduction is required for existing installations and from 2018, a 60% reduction for new installations is required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en6126391

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High sulphur concentration in seaweed can lead to production of H2S that lowers BMP and elevates SO2 emissions on biogas combustion.

    “The high sulphur concentration in seaweed can also lead to the production of H2S that lowers BMP and elevates SO2 emissions on biogas combustion [85].”

    From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [85]

    Section 4.2.2 (Anaerobic Digestion; page unavailable) says that high sulphate concentration can cause H2S formation, particularly in green macroalgae. It does not say that H2S lowers biochemical methane potential (BMP) or increases SO2 emissions when biogas is burned. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Skjermo, J. Macroalgae Activities in Norway; Nordic Algae Workshop: Grenaa, Denmark, 2012.
  2. Bruton, T.; Lyons, H.; Lerat, Y.; Stanley, M.; Rasmussen, M.B. A Review of the Potential of Marine Algae as a Source of Biofuel in Ireland; Sustainable Energy Ireland: Dublin, Ireland, 2009.
  3. Makkar, H.P.S., Ed.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2012; Chapter 24, pp. 423-446.
  4. Farrelly, D.; Fagan, C.; McDonnell, K. Effect of Carbon Dioxide Concentrations on the Carbon Mitigation Potential of Microalgae. In Biosystems Engineering Research Review 17;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, F., Devlin, G., Deverell, R., & McDonnell, K.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Hall, La Touche House, Custom House Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1, Ireland
Corresponding author
Devlin, Ger
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2013-12-04
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
6391-6412
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156219681
Cited by
95
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (6C/CP/E001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
Keywords
biofuel production, algal biomass, microalgae, seaweed, biodiesel, bioethanol, waste cooking oil, tallow, oilseed rape, algae cultivation, algal harvesting, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, Ireland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review