Cited by 287Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthReproductive tract infections research

In Vitro Evaluation of Adhesion Capacity, Hydrophobicity, and Auto-Aggregation of Newly Isolated Potential Probiotic Strains

Open access
Krausova, Gabriela, Hyrslova, Ivana, Hynstova, Iveta·2019·Fermentation

Abstract

We isolated several strains of human and animal origin, focusing on the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Samples of cow colostrum, feces and saliva of calves and piglets, and infant feces were acquired, bacterial strains were isolated and identified, and twenty strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria were shortlisted for further in vitro analysis of adhesion capacity to human cells, surface hydrophobicity, and auto-aggregation. Adhesion capacity was evaluated using a mixture of Caco-2 and HT-29-MTX cells and hydrophobicity was measured using the microbial adhesion to the hydrocarbon method. Lactobacillus reuteri was the most frequently isolated species, followed by L. casei subsp. paracasei and L. gasseri; all strains were isolated from infant feces. Bifidobacteria were represented by the species B. longum (infant feces), and B. thermophilum and B. pseudolongum (calves, piglets). All twenty strains showed good adhesion capacities to the mixed cell culture (17.7–37.2%), particularly, L. reuteri isolates K7 and K14 (37.2% and 35.5%, respectively). In hydrophobicity and auto-aggregation assays, strain-specific differences irrespective of the origin or taxonomic group were observed. Hydrophobicity values varied considerably (from 6.1% to 87.4%), whereas auto-aggregation ability ranged from 21.7% to 69.7%. No relation was observed between hydrophobicity and adhesion capacity; instead, auto-aggregation was apparently related with adhesion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fermentation5040100

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adhesion to epithelial cells is a desirable property for probiotic potential and results in colonizing the gastrointestinal tract, helping probiotic bacteria in competition and proliferation in the intestine.

    “One of the main desirable properties to consider in the search for new strains with probiotic potential is related to adhesion to epithelial cells, which consequently results in colonizing the gastrointestinal tract, helping probiotic bacteria in the competition and proliferation in the intestine [38].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shakirova, L.; Grube, M.; Gavare, M.; Auzina, L.; Zikmanis, P. Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lacis Bb12 cell surface hydrophobicity and survival of the cells under adverse environmental conditions. J. Nutr. 2013, 40, 85-93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krausova, G., Hyrslova, I., & Hynstova, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Microbiology and Technology, Dairy Research Institute, Ltd., Ke Dvoru 12a, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic
  • Výzkumný Ústav Mlékárenský (CZ)
Venue
Fermentation
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
100
ISSN
2311-5637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991759969
Cited by
287
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 5
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Fermentation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministerstvo Zemědělství (MZE-RO1419)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
probiotic strains, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, bacterial adhesion, surface hydrophobicity, self-aggregation, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus gasseri, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium thermophilum, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, infant feces, cow colostrum, calves, piglets, Caco-2 cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review