Cited by 102Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on problematic smartphone use: comparison between problematic and non-problematic adolescent users.

Open access
Extremera, Natalio, Quintana-Orts, Cirenia, Sánchez-Álvarez, Nicolás, Rey, Lourdes·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Prior work has suggested that individuals with deficits in emotion regulation skills are prone to compulsive behaviour and to following maladaptive coping strategies, such as smartphone overuse, to manage negative moods. Adolescence is a vulnerable developmental stage for deficits in emotion regulation, and these are linked to excessive smartphone use. The present study is the first to examine the links between the use of specific cognitive emotion regulation (CER) strategies and problematic smartphone use in a sample of adolescents. A total of 845 Spanish adolescents (455 females) completed the Spanish versions of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and the Smartphone Addiction Scale, along with a socio-demographic survey. The adolescents were divided into two groups: Non-problematic smartphone users (n = 491, 58.1%) and problematic smartphone users (n = 354, 41.9%). Significant group differences were found, with the problematic users reporting significantly higher scores for all maladaptive CER strategies, including higher self-blame, rumination, blaming of others and catastrophising. The results from logistic regression analyses show that rumination, catastrophising and blaming of others were the most important variables for distinguishing between the two groups, along with gender and parental control outside the home. In summary, these findings suggest the importance of specific maladaptive CER strategies in problematic smartphone use and provide insight for relevant targets for intervention designs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16173142

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological well-being can be enhanced by the use of adaptive emotion regulation strategies.

    “A substantial amount of research findings point to the fact that psychological well-being can be enhanced by the use of adaptive emotion regulation strategies (Extremera et al., 2019).”

    From Knowledge of COVID-19 and Its Influence on Mindfulness, Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Psychological Flexibility in the Indian Community (2020) · cites this paper as Extremera et al., 2019

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says adaptive emotion regulation strategies are related to better mental health and well-being. That supports an association, but not the claim that using them enhances psychological well-being; the paper does not establish that causal effect. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Excessive smartphone use is associated with difficulties in cognitive-emotion regulation.

    “Excessive smartphone use is associated with difficulties in cognitive-emotion regulation, impulsivity, impaired cognitive function, addiction to social networking, shyness and low self-esteem.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Extremera, N., Quintana-Orts, C., Sánchez-Álvarez, N., & Rey, L.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Málaga (ES)
  • Department of Social, Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, University of Huelva, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Av. Fuerzas Armadas, 21007 Huelva, Spain
  • Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain
Corresponding author
Extremera, Natalio
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-08-28
Volume
16
Issue
17
Pages
3142
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970098597
Cited by
102
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
University of Málaga (PPIT.UMA.B1.2017/23)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
cognitive emotion regulation, smartphone addiction, adolescents, rumination, catastrophizing, self-blame, blaming others, maladaptive coping, parental control, gender differences
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Emotional Regulation, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review