Cited by 232Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health Research TopicsChild Development and Digital Technology

Depression and emotion regulation predict objective smartphone use measured over one week

Elhai, Jon D., Tiamiyu, Mojisola F., Weeks, Justin W., Levine, Jason C., Picard, Kristina J., Hall, Brian J.·2018·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.051

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elhai, J. D., Tiamiyu, M. F., Weeks, J. W., Levine, J. C., Picard, K. J., & Hall, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Brian J.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
133
Pages
21-28
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2608175373
Cited by
232
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 2
FWCI
71.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
smartphone use, depression, emotion regulation, expressive suppression, psychopathology, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review