Cited by 1,010Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWaste Management and Recycling

Microplastics profile along the Rhine River

Open access
Mani, Thomas, Hauk, Armin, Walter, Ulrich, Burkhardt-Holm, Patricia·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Microplastics result from fragmentation of plastic debris or are released to the environment as pre-production pellets or components of consumer and industrial products. In the oceans, they contribute to the ‘great garbage patches’. They are ingested by many organisms, from protozoa to baleen whales and pose a threat to the aquatic fauna. Although as much as 80% of marine debris originates from land, little attention was given to the role of rivers as debris pathways to the sea. Worldwide, not a single great river has yet been studied for the surface microplastics load over its length. We report the abundance and composition of microplastics at the surface of the Rhine, one of the largest European rivers. Measurements were made at 11 locations over a stretch of 820 km. Microplastics were found in all samples, with 892,777 particles km −2 on average. In the Rhine-Ruhr metropolitan area, a peak concentration of 3.9 million particles km −2 was measured. Microplastics concentrations were diverse along and across the river, reflecting various sources and sinks such as waste water treatment plants, tributaries and weirs. Measures should be implemented to avoid and reduce the pollution with anthropogenic litter in aquatic ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep17988

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mani, T., Hauk, A., Walter, U., & Burkhardt-Holm, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Intertek (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-12-08
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
17988-17988
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2428475944
Cited by
1,010
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 17
FWCI
26.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Universität Basel
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Universität Wien
  • Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau
  • Rijkswaterstaat
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
microplastics, Rhine River, riverine plastic pollution, microplastic abundance, microplastic composition, surface water contamination, wastewater treatment plants, tributaries, weirs, anthropogenic litter
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Geography, Humans, Plastics, Waste Products, Ecosystem, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review