Cited by 58Urban Green Space and HealthEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Examining Psychosocial and Economic Barriers to Green Space Access for Racialised Individuals and Families: A Narrative Literature Review of the Evidence to Date

Open access
Robinson, Tila, Robertson, Noelle, Curtis, Ffion, Darko, Natalie, Jones, Ceri R.·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social prescribing (such as green social prescribing), aims to address health disparities cross-culturally to improve well-being. However, evidence highlights racial disparities in relation to access to quality green space (including local/national parks and recreational spaces). This review aimed to identify the psycho-socioeconomic barriers to green space access for racialised individuals/families and Black Indigenous People of Colour (BIPOC), to understand what cultural adaptations might be made to help support them to access green social prescribing within the UK. METHOD: A narrative systematic review was conducted to identify barriers to green space access for racialised individuals/families and BIPOC. Searches of publication databases (APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [CDSR], Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], and SCOPUS Preview) were undertaken from January to February 2022, to identify quantitative peer reviewed studies. Of the 4493 abstracts identified, ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for final review. RESULTS: The results suggest that interpersonal, practical (such as transportation costs, entrance fees and lodging costs) and environmental factors can act as barriers to green space access for racialised individuals/families. Most frequently reported barriers were perceptions of safety and costs associated with travel and accessing green spaces, particularly for families. CONCLUSION: Factors such as diversity-friendly schemes (e.g., multiple languages on signs and additional prayer spaces in parks), funding and strategies to improve safety should be considered in the design and commissioning of green space and green social prescribing initiatives in primary care. By mitigating these barriers green space can become more accessible and improve inclusivity for racialised individuals/families. Future research could explore the inter-racial differences between racialised populations and which mechanisms reduce barriers to access and in what contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20010745

Cites

87 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Access to affordable, appropriate housing is becoming increasingly challenging for urban populations facing precarious housing conditions.

    “One of these key aspects is access to affordable, appropriate housing, which is becoming increasingly challenging for urban populations facing precarious housing conditions (133-135).”

    From Bridging Sectors and Disciplines to Gain a Critical Understanding of the Eco-Social Determinants of Health Inequities: The ESDHI-EU Conference (2025) · cites this paper as [135]

    Section 1.7 (Gentrification; page unavailable) says BIPOC individuals and families may be unable to afford newly developed areas, supporting a narrower point about affordability. The paper does not establish a worsening lack of affordable, appropriate housing for urban populations generally or address precarious housing conditions. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]Lovell R. White M.P. Wheeler B. Taylor T. Elliott L. A rapid scoping review of health and wellbeing evidence for the green infrastructure standards Nautral England University of Exeter Exeter, UK 2020
  2. [55]Gould K. Lewis T. Green Gentrification: Urban Sustainability and the Struggle for Environmental Justice Routledge London, UK 2016
  3. [74]EPOC Resources for Review Authors 2013 Available online: https://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors (accessed on 25 February 2022)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, T., Robertson, N., Curtis, F., Darko, N., & Jones, C. R.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Robertson, Noelle
  • Jones, Ceri R.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-31
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
745
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313471945
Cited by
58
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
green space access, green social prescribing, racial disparities, BIPOC, access barriers, psychosocial barriers, socioeconomic barriers, perceived safety, travel cost, park entrance fees, cultural adaptation, primary care, health disparities
MeSH terms
Parks, Recreational, Ethnicity, Humans, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review