Cited by 95Occupational exposure and asthmaIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureWater Treatment and Disinfection

Prevalence of ocular, respiratory and cutaneous symptoms in indoor swimming pool workers and exposure to disinfection by-products (DBPs)

Open access
Fantuzzi, Guglielmina, Righi, Elena, Predieri, Guerrino, Giacobazzi, Pierluigi, Mastroianni, Katia, Aggazzotti, Gabriella·2010·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the prevalence of self-reported respiratory, ocular and cutaneous symptoms in subjects working at indoor swimming pools and to assess the relationship between frequency of declared symptoms and occupational exposure to disinfection by-products (DBPs). Twenty indoor swimming pools in the Emilia Romagna region of Italy were included in the study. Information about the health status of 133 employees was collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Subjects working at swimming pools claimed to frequently experience the following symptoms: cold (65.4%), sneezing (52.6%), red eyes (48.9%) and itchy eyes (44.4%). Only 7.5% claimed to suffer from asthma. Red eyes, runny nose, voice loss and cold symptoms were declared more frequently by pool attendants (lifeguards and trainers) when compared with employees working in other areas of the facility (office, cafe, etc.). Pool attendants experienced generally more verrucas, mycosis, eczema and rash than others workers; however, only the difference in the frequency of self-declared mycosis was statistically significant (p = 0.010). Exposure to DBPs was evaluated using both environmental and biological monitoring. Trihalomethanes (THMs), the main DBPs, were evaluated in alveolar air samples collected from subjects. Swimming pool workers experienced different THM exposure levels: lifeguards and trainers showed the highest mean values of THMs in alveolar air samples (28.5 ± 20.2 µg/m3), while subjects working in cafe areas (17.6 ± 12.1 µg/m3), offices (14.4 ± 12.0 µg/m3) and engine rooms (13.6 ± 4.4 µg/m3) showed lower exposure levels. Employees with THM alveolar air values higher than 21 µg/m3 (median value) experienced higher risks for red eyes (OR 6.2; 95% CI 2.6–14.9), itchy eyes (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5–8.0), dyspnea/asthma (OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.0–27.2) and blocked nose (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0–4.7) than subjects with less exposure. This study confirms that lifeguards and trainers are more at risk for respiratory and ocular irritative symptoms and cutaneous diseases than subjects with other occupations at swimming pool facilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph7041379

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]WHO (World Health Organization) Guidelines for Safe Recreational-Water Environments, Vol. 2: Swimming Pools, Spas and Similar Recreational-Water Environments World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fantuzzi, G., Righi, E., Predieri, G., Giacobazzi, P., Mastroianni, K., & Aggazzotti, G.
Affiliations
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Fantuzzi, Guglielmina
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-03-29
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
1379-1391
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081877777
Cited by
95
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
disinfection by-products, trihalomethanes, occupational exposure, respiratory symptoms, ocular symptoms, cutaneous manifestations, asthma, fungal infection, biomonitoring, environmental monitoring, lifeguards, occupational health, Emilia-Romagna, chlorination, water disinfection, atopic dermatitis
MeSH terms
Adult, Chromatography, Gas, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disinfectants, Eye Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Respiratory Tract Infections, Skin Diseases, Prevalence, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review