CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smart and Multi-Functional Magnetic Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment Applications: Clinical Challenges and Future Prospects

Aram, Elham, Moeni, Masome, Abedizadeh, Roya, Sabour, Davood, Sadeghi-Abandansari, Hamid, Gardy, Jabbar, Hassanpour, Ali·2022·Nanomaterials
DOI 10.3390/nano12203567PMC PMC9611246
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Iron oxide nanoparticle (IONPs) have become a subject of interest in various biomedical fields due to their magnetism and biocompatibility. They can be utilized as heat mediators in magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) or as contrast media in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US). In addition, their high drug-loading capacity enabled them to be therapeutic agent transporters for malignancy treatment. Hence, smartening them allows for an intelligent controlled drug release (CDR) and targeted drug delivery (TDD). Smart magnetic nanoparticles (SMNPs) can overcome the impediments faced by classical chemo-treatment strategies, since they can be navigated and release drug via external or internal stimuli. Recently, they have been synchronized with other modalities, e.g., MRI, MHT, US, and for dual/multimodal theranostic applications in a single platform. Herein, we provide an overview of the attributes of MNPs for cancer theranostic application, fabrication procedures, surface coatings, targeting approaches, and recent advancement of SMNPs. Even though MNPs feature numerous privileges over chemotherapy agents, obstacles remain in clinical usage. This review in particular covers the clinical predicaments faced by SMNPs and future research scopes in the field of SMNPs for cancer theranostics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nano12203567

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Types of materials applied as coating agents for MNPs.
Figure 1 Types of materials applied as coating agents for MNPs.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Preparation of di-block copolymer based on PEG and PCL. Reprinted with permission from [201]. Elsevier, 2018.
Figure 2 Preparation of di-block copolymer based on PEG and PCL. Reprinted with permission from [201]. Elsevier, 2018.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Enzyme-responsive, glycine-coated, MTX-conjugated Fe3O4 NPs. Redrawn from [209].
Figure 3 Enzyme-responsive, glycine-coated, MTX-conjugated Fe3O4 NPs. Redrawn from [209].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Schematic representation of a triple stimuli-responsive MNP drug carrier. Redrawn from [261].
Figure 4 Schematic representation of a triple stimuli-responsive MNP drug carrier. Redrawn from [261].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Schematic representation of an in vivo experimental procedure and the active targeting of DOX, and the cellular uptake by 4T1 cells following the administration. Redrawn from [282].
Figure 5 Schematic representation of an in vivo experimental procedure and the active targeting of DOX, and the cellular uptake by 4T1 cells following the administration. Redrawn from [282].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 323

  1. Fitzmaurice, 2017, Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived with Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study, JAMA Oncol., 3, 524, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688 · DOI
  2. Moein, 2020, Cancer regeneration: Polyploid cells are the key drivers of tumor progression, Biochim. Biophys Acta Rev. Cancer, 1874, 188408, 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188408 · DOI
  3. Thitichai, 2019, Study of biodistribution and systemic toxicity of glucose functionalized SPIO/DOX micelles, Pharm. Dev. Technol., 24, 935, 10.1080/10837450.2019.1569679 · DOI
  4. Azamjah, 2019, Global Trend of Breast Cancer Mortality Rate: A 25-Year Study, Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 20, 2015, 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2015 · DOI
  5. Mattiuzzi, 2019, Current Cancer Epidemiology, J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health, 9, 217, 10.2991/jegh.k.191008.001 · DOI
  6. Sung, 2021, Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries, CA Cancer J. Clin., 71, 209, 10.3322/caac.21660 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Salehiniya, 2016, Time Trend Analysis of Cancer Incidence in Caspian Sea, 2004–2009: A Population-based Cancer Registries Study (northern Iran), Casp. J. Intern. Med., 7, 25
  8. Takeshima, 2019, Accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal cells and cancer risk, NPJ Precis. Oncol., 3, 7, 10.1038/s41698-019-0079-0 · DOI
  9. Morand, 2014, Insights into Genetic and Epigenetic Determinants with Impact on Vitamin D Signaling and Cancer Association Studies: The Case of Thyroid Cancer, Front. Oncol., 4, 309
  10. Lewandowska, 2019, Environmental risk factors for cancer—Review paper, Ann. Agric. Environ. Med., 26, 1, 10.26444/aaem/94299 · DOI
  11. Joung, M.J., Han, M.A., Park, J., and Ryu, S.-Y. (2016). Association between Family and Friend Smoking Status and Adolescent Smoking Behavior and E-Cigarette Use in Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 13. · DOI
  12. Erenpreisa, 2020, Paradoxes of cancer: Survival at the brink, Semin. Cancer Biol., 81, 119, 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.12.009 · DOI
  13. Pienta, 2020, Convergent Evolution, Evolving Evolvability, and the Origins of Lethal Cancer, Mol. Cancer Res., 18, 801, 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-1158 · DOI
  14. Das, 2019, β-cyclodextrin based dual-responsive multifunctional nanotheranostics for cancer cell targeting and dual drug delivery, Carbohydr. Polym., 206, 694, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.049 · DOI
  15. Mancarella, 2015, Polymer-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles for Curcumin Delivery to Cancer Cells, Macromol. Biosci., 15, 1365, 10.1002/mabi.201500142 · DOI
  16. Manatunga, 2018, Effective delivery of hydrophobic drugs to breast and liver cancer cells using a hybrid inorganic nanocarrier: A detailed investigation using cytotoxicity assays, fluorescence imaging and flow cytometry, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 128, 18, 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.04.001 · DOI
  17. Rahimi, 2017, Co-delivery of doxorubicin and methotrexate by dendritic chitosan-g-mPEG as a magnetic nanocarrier for multi-drug delivery in combination chemotherapy, Polym. Chem., 8, 7333, 10.1039/C7PY01701D · DOI
  18. Yetisgin, A.A., Cetinel, S., Zuvin, M., Kosar, A., and Kutlu, O. (2020). Therapeutic Nanoparticles and Their Targeted Delivery Applications. Molecules, 25. · DOI
  19. Chamundeeswari, 2018, Nanocarriers for drug delivery applications, Environ. Chem. Lett., 17, 849, 10.1007/s10311-018-00841-1 · DOI
  20. Bai, 2019, Accurate Clinical Diagnosis of Liver Cancer Based on Simultaneous Detection of Ternary Specific Antigens by Magnetic Induced Mixing Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Emissions, Anal. Chem., 91, 2955, 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05153 · DOI
  21. Satpathy, 2019, Targeted Drug Delivery and Image-Guided Therapy of Heterogeneous Ovarian Cancer Using HER2-Targeted Theranostic Nanoparticles, Theranostics, 9, 778, 10.7150/thno.29964 · DOI
  22. Wei, 2017, Clickable and imageable multiblock polymer micelles with magnetically guided and PEG-switched targeting and release property for precise tumor theranosis, Biomaterials, 145, 138, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.005 · DOI
  23. Ciofani, G. (2018). Smart Nanoparticles for Biomedicine, Elsevier.
  24. Guo, 2018, The Recent Advances of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Medicine, J. Nanomater., 2018, 1, 10.1155/2018/7805147 · DOI
  25. Soetaert, 2020, Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies. Adv, Drug Deliv. Rev., 163, 65, 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.025 · DOI
  26. Assa, 2016, A biotechnological perspective on the application of iron oxide nanoparticles, Nano Res., 9, 2203, 10.1007/s12274-016-1131-9 · DOI
  27. Sasikala, 2015, A smart magnetic nanoplatform for synergistic anticancer therapy: Manoeuvring mussel-inspired functional magnetic nanoparticles for pH responsive anticancer drug delivery and hyperthermia, Nanoscale, 7, 18119, 10.1039/C5NR05844A · DOI
  28. Barick, 2016, Pluronic stabilized Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for intracellular delivery of curcumin, RSC Adv., 6, 98674, 10.1039/C6RA21207G · DOI
  29. Pourjavadi, 2018, Magnetic micellar nanocarrier based on pH-sensitive PEG-PCL-PEG triblock copolymer: A potential carrier for hydrophobic anticancer drugs, J. Nanopart. Res., 20, 282, 10.1007/s11051-018-4366-4 · DOI
  30. Sadr, 2018, PLA-based magnetic nanoparticles armed with thermo/pH responsive polymers for combination cancer chemotherapy, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol., 45, 240, 10.1016/j.jddst.2018.03.019 · DOI
  31. Pourjavadi, 2018, Delivery of Hydrophobic Anticancer Drugs by Hydrophobically Modified Alginate Based Magnetic Nanocarrier, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 57, 822, 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04050 · DOI
  32. Kang, 2017, Surface design of magnetic nanoparticles for stimuli-responsive cancer imaging and therapy, Biomaterials, 136, 98, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.013 · DOI
  33. Pourjavadi, 2020, pH and thermal dual-responsive poly(NIPAM-co-GMA)-coated magnetic nanoparticles via surface-initiated RAFT polymerization for controlled drug delivery, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 108, 110418, 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110418 · DOI
  34. Cabeza, 2020, Magnetically active pNIPAM nanosystems as temperature-sensitive biocompatible structures for controlled drug delivery, Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol., 48, 1022, 10.1080/21691401.2020.1773488 · DOI
  35. Agrahari, 2018, Facilitating the translation of nanomedicines to a clinical product: Challenges and opportunities, Drug Discov. Today, 23, 974, 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.047 · DOI
  36. Khandel, 2018, Mycogenic nanoparticles and their bio-prospective applications: Current status and future challenges, J. Nanostruct. Chem., 8, 369, 10.1007/s40097-018-0285-2 · DOI
  37. Rahmani, 2020, Plant-mediated synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) using aloe vera and flaxseed extracts and evaluation of their cellular toxicities, Ceram. Int., 46, 3051, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.005 · DOI
  38. Ullah, 2022, Plant extract-based synthesis of metallic nanomaterials, their applications, and safety concerns, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 119, 2273, 10.1002/bit.28148 · DOI
  39. Majeed, 2020, Bacteria Mediated Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial, Antioxidant, Cytocompatibility Properties, J. Clust. Sci., 32, 1083, 10.1007/s10876-020-01876-7 · DOI
  40. Vainshtein, 2014, Synthesis of magneto-sensitive iron-containing nanoparticles by yeasts, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 41, 657, 10.1007/s10295-014-1417-4 · DOI
  41. Satheeshkumar, 2020, Structural, morphological and magnetic properties of algae/CoFe2O4 and algae/Ag-Fe-O nanocomposites and their biomedical applications, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 111, 107578, 10.1016/j.inoche.2019.107578 · DOI
  42. Salem, 2019, Biogenic synthesis and antimicrobial potency of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using algae harvested from the Mediterranean Sea, Egypt. Egypt, J. Aquat. Res., 45, 197, 10.1016/j.ejar.2019.07.002 · DOI
  43. Mathur, 2021, Endophytic fungi mediated synthesis of iron nanoparticles: Characterization and application in methylene blue decolorization, Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem., 4, 100053, 10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100053 · DOI
  44. Mahanty, 2019, Green Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Mediated by Filamentous Fungi Isolated from Sundarban Mangrove Ecosystem, India, BioNanoScience, 9, 637, 10.1007/s12668-019-00644-w · DOI
  45. Nie, 2021, Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized Via Green Tea Extract for Doxorubicin Delivery, Curr. Nanosci., 17, 646, 10.2174/1573413716999201029205654 · DOI
  46. Bao, 2021, Plant-Extract-Mediated Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles, J. Chem., 2021, 6562687, 10.1155/2021/6562687 · DOI
  47. Hamdy, N.M., Boseila, A.A., Ramadan, A.E., and Basalious, E.B. (2022). Iron Oxide Nanoparticles-Plant Insignia Synthesis with Favorable Biomedical Activities and Less Toxicity, in the “Era of the-Green”: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics, 14. · DOI
  48. Salem, 2020, Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Prospective Biotechnological Applications: An Overview, Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 199, 344, 10.1007/s12011-020-02138-3 · DOI
  49. Nadeem, M., Khan, R., Shah, N.R., Bangash, I.R., Abbasi, B.H., Hano, C., Liu, C., Ullah, S., Hashmi, S.S., and Nadhman, A. (2021). A Review of Microbial Mediated Iron Nanoparticles (IONPs) and Its Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials, 12. · DOI
  50. Mathur, 2018, Pharmaceutical aspects of silver nanoparticles, Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol., 46, 115, 10.1080/21691401.2017.1414825 · DOI
  51. Singh, 2016, Biological Synthesis of Nanoparticles from Plants and Microorganisms, Trends Biotechnol., 34, 588, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.006 · DOI
  52. Klis, 2006, Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yeast, 23, 185, 10.1002/yea.1349 · DOI
  53. Ma, 2016, Yeast Cells Encapsulating Polymer Nanoparticles as Trojan Particles via in Situ Polymerization inside Cells, Macromolecules, 49, 1545, 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00016 · DOI
  54. Fawcett, 2017, A Review of Current Research into the Biogenic Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles via Marine Algae and Seagrasses, J. Nanosci., 2017, 013850, 10.1155/2017/8013850 · DOI
  55. Chandran, 2012, Size controlled synthesis of biocompatible gold nanoparticles and their activity in the oxidation of NADH, Nanotechnology, 23, 015602, 10.1088/0957-4484/23/1/015602 · DOI
  56. Dahoumane, 2016, Noble metal, oxide and chalcogenide-based nanomaterials from scalable phototrophic culture systems. Enzym, Microb. Technol., 95, 13, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.06.008 · DOI
  57. Parial, 2014, Biosynthesis of monodisperse gold nanoparticles by green alga Rhizoclonium and associated biochemical changes, J. Appl. Phycol., 27, 975, 10.1007/s10811-014-0355-x · DOI
  58. Sodipo, 2016, Recent advances in synthesis and surface modification of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with silica, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 416, 275, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.019 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Arbain, 2011, Preparation of iron oxide nanoparticles by mechanical milling, Miner. Eng., 24, 1, 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.08.025 · DOI
  60. Kurapov, 2018, Physical synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles and their biological activity in vivo, SN Appl. Sci., 1, 1
  61. Scharf, 2017, Interaction of iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized by laser target evaporation with polyacrylamide in composites and ferrogels, Chim. Techno Acta, 4, 128, 10.15826/chimtech/2017.4.2.028 · DOI
  62. Sequeira, 2018, Electrochemical Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Application, Org. Med. Chem. Int. J., 5, 555660
  63. Sorvali, 2019, Controlling the phase of iron oxide nanoparticles fabricated from iron(III) nitrate by liquid flame spray, Int. J. Ceram. Eng. Sci., 4, 194, 10.1002/ces2.10025 · DOI
  64. Sathya, 2017, Ultrasound assisted phytosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticle, Ultrason. Sonochem., 39, 446, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.05.017 · DOI
  65. Rivera-Chaverra, M.J., Restrepo-Parra, E., Acosta-Medina, C.D., Mello, A., and Ospina, R. (2020). Synthesis of Oxide Iron Nanoparticles Using Laser Ablation for Possible Hyperthermia Applications. Nanomaterials, 10. · DOI
  66. Dadfar, 2019, Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev., 138, 302, 10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Ali, 2021, Review on Recent Progress in Magnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Diverse Applications, Front. Chem., 9, 629054, 10.3389/fchem.2021.629054 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Teja, 2009, Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater., 55, 22, 10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2008.08.003 · DOI
  69. Osial, M., Rybicka, P., kaBa, M.P., Cichowicz, G., CyrbDski, M.K., and KrysiDski, P. (2018). Easy Synthesis and Characterization of Holmium-Doped SPIONs. Nanomaterials, 8. · DOI
  70. Aende, 2022, A novel highly osmotic K/Fe3O4/CNF magnetic draw solution for salty water desalination, Desalination, 538, 115903, 10.1016/j.desal.2022.115903 · DOI
  71. Anastasiou, 2018, Exogenous mineralization of hard tissues using photo-absorptive minerals and femto-second lasers; the case of dental enamel, Acta Biomater., 71, 86, 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.012 · DOI
  72. Gardy, 2018, A magnetically separable SO4/Fe-Al-TiO2 solid acid catalyst for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil, J. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 234, 268, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.046 · DOI
  73. Gardy, 2019, A core-shell SO4/Mg-Al-Fe3O4 catalyst for biodiesel production, J. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 259, 118093, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118093 · DOI
  74. Hesas, 2019, An investigation on the capability of magnetically separable Fe3O4/mordenite zeolite for refinery oily wastewater purification, J. Environ. Manag., 241, 525, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.005 · DOI
  75. Besenhard, 2020, Co-precipitation synthesis of stable iron oxide nanoparticles with NaOH: New insights and continuous production via flow chemistry, Chem. Eng. J., 399, 125740, 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125740 · DOI
  76. Besenhard, 2021, Small iron oxide nanoparticles as MRI T1 contrast agent: Scalable inexpensive water-based synthesis using a flow reactor, Nanoscale, 13, 8795, 10.1039/D1NR00877C · DOI
  77. Bhandari, 2016, Single step synthesis, characterization and applications of curcumin functionalized iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles. Mater, Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 67, 59, 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.093 · DOI
  78. Fatima, 2018, Iron-based magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging, Adv. Powder Technol., 29, 2678, 10.1016/j.apt.2018.07.017 · DOI
  79. Majidi, 2016, Current methods for synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles. Artif. Cells Nanomed, Biotechnol., 44, 722
  80. Cotin, G., Kiefer, C., Perton, F., Ihiawakrim, D., Blanco-Andujar, C., Moldovan, S., Lefevre, C., Ersen, O., Pichon, B., and Mertz, D. (2018). Unravelling the Thermal Decomposition Parameters for The Synthesis of Anisotropic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials, 8. · DOI
  81. Xie, 2018, Shape-, size- and structure-controlled synthesis and biocompatibility of iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic theranostics, Theranostics, 8, 3284, 10.7150/thno.25220 · DOI
  82. Liang, 2016, Ultrafast Preparation of Monodisperse Fe3O4 Nanoparticles by Microwave-Assisted Thermal Decomposition, Chemistry, 22, 11807, 10.1002/chem.201601434 · DOI
  83. Gyergyek, 2017, Hydrothermal growth of iron oxide NPs with a uniform size distribution for magnetically induced hyperthermia: Structural, colloidal and magnetic properties, J. Alloys Compd., 694, 261, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.238 · DOI
  84. Salvador, M., Gutiérrez, G., Noriega, S., Moyano, A., Blanco-López, M.d.C., and Matos, M. (2021). Microemulsion Synthesis of Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles for Bioapplications. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22. · DOI
  85. Najafi, 2017, Synthesis and Magnetic Properties Evaluation of Monosized FeCo Alloy Nanoparticles Through Microemulsion Method, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., 30, 2647, 10.1007/s10948-017-4052-2 · DOI
  86. Horikoshi, S., and Serpone, N. (2013). Microwaves in Nanoparticle Synthesis: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley and Sons. · DOI
  87. Antone, A.J., Sun, Z., and Bao, Y. (2019). Preparation and Application of Iron Oxide Nanoclusters. Magnetochemistry, 5. · DOI
  88. Wang, 2020, One pot synthesis of zwitteronic 99mTc doped ultrasmall iron oxide nanoparticles for SPECT/T1-weighted MR dual-modality tumor imaging, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 197, 111403, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111403 · DOI
  89. Yoo, 2017, One pot synthesis of amine-functionalized and angular-shaped superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for MR/fluorescence bimodal imaging application, RSC Adv., 7, 12876, 10.1039/C6RA28495G · DOI
  90. Pakapongpan, 2022, A facile one-pot synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles embed N-doped graphene modified magnetic screen printed electrode for electrochemical sensing of chloramphenicol and diethylstilbestrol, Talanta, 241, 123184, 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123184 · DOI
  91. Anwer, 2020, Magnetism in drug delivery: The marvels of iron oxides and substituted ferrites nanoparticles, Saudi Pharm. J., 28, 876, 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.05.003 · DOI
  92. Mohammed, 2017, Magnetic nanoparticles for environmental and biomedical applications: A review, Particuology, 30, 1, 10.1016/j.partic.2016.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Veiseh, 2010, Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev., 62, 284, 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.002 · DOI
  94. Zhou, 2019, Recent Advances of Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles in Optical Sensing and Therapy, Curr. Pharm. Des., 25, 4861, 10.2174/1381612826666191219130033 · DOI
  95. Gotman, 2016, Iron oxide and gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy, AIP Conf. Proc., 1760, 020020, 10.1063/1.4960239 · DOI
  96. Gorbe, 2015, Gated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the controlled delivery of drugs in cancer cells, Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids, 31, 3753, 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00139 · DOI
  97. Liberman, 2014, Synthesis and surface functionalization of silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine, Surf. Sci. Rep., 69, 132, 10.1016/j.surfrep.2014.07.001 · DOI
  98. Murugadoss, 2017, Toxicology of silica nanoparticles: An update, Arch. Toxicol., 91, 2967, 10.1007/s00204-017-1993-y · DOI
  99. Zhong, 2018, One-Pot Synthesis of Highly Stable CsPbBr3@SiO2 Core-Shell Nanoparticles, ACS Nano, 12, 8579, 10.1021/acsnano.8b04209 · DOI
  100. Hu, 2018, Continuous and scalable fabrication of stable and biocompatible MOF@SiO2 nanoparticles for drug loading, J. Mater. Chem. B, 6, 7936, 10.1039/C8TB02308E · DOI
  101. Foglia, 2017, In vitro biocompatibility study of sub-U nm silica-coated magnetic iron oxide fluorescent nanoparticles for potential biomedical application, Sci. Rep., 7, 46513, 10.1038/srep46513 · DOI
  102. Jia, 2015, Influence of silica coating process on fine structure and magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles, Electrochim. Acta, 183, 148, 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.119 · DOI
  103. Saikia, 2016, Differential Protein Adsorption and Cellular Uptake of Silica Nanoparticles Based on Size and Porosity, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 34820, 10.1021/acsami.6b09950 · DOI
  104. Xue, 2012, Four types of inorganic nanoparticles stimulate the inflammatory reaction in brain microglia and damage neurons in vitro, Toxicol. Lett., 214, 91, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.08.009 · DOI
  105. Chen, 2013, Kupffer cell-mediated hepatic injury induced by silica nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo, Int. J. Nanomed., 8, 1129
  106. Yu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, W., Jin, M., Du, Z., Li, Y., Duan, J., Yu, Y., and Sun, Z. (2013). Acute Toxicity of Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles in Intravenously Exposed ICR Mice. PLoS ONE, 8. · DOI
  107. Zhuravskii, 2016, Mast cell accumulation precedes tissue fibrosis induced by intravenously administered amorphous silica nanoparticles, Toxicol. Mech. Methods, 26, 260, 10.3109/15376516.2016.1169341 · DOI
  108. Limbach, 2007, Exposure of engineered nanoparticles to human lung epithelial cells: Influence of chemical composition and catalytic activity on oxidative stress, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4158, 10.1021/es062629t · DOI
  109. Boraschi, 2010, Nanoparticles and the immune system, Endocrinology, 151, 458, 10.1210/en.2009-1082 · DOI · Paper page
  110. Jessop, 2016, Autophagy deficiency in macrophages enhances NLRP3 inflammasome activity and chronic lung disease following silica exposure, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 309, 101, 10.1016/j.taap.2016.08.029 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Park, 2020, Cloaking Silica Nanoparticles with Functional Protein Coatings for Reduced Complement Activation and Cellular Uptake, ACS Nano, 14, 11950, 10.1021/acsnano.0c05097 · DOI
  112. Shaterabadi, 2017, High impact of in situ dextran coating on biocompatibility, stability and magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 75, 947, 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.143 · DOI
  113. Hein, 2008, Chitosan composites for biomedical applications: Status, challenges and perspectives, Mater. Sci. Technol., 24, 1053, 10.1179/174328408X341744 · DOI
  114. Hammad, 2020, Gas-phase synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles for improved magnetic hyperthermia performance, J. Alloys Compd., 824, 153814, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153814 · DOI
  115. Tadros, T.F. (2014). An Introduction to Surfactants, De Gruyter. · DOI
  116. Poller, 2017, Selection of potential iron oxide nanoparticles for breast cancer treatment based on in vitro cytotoxicity and cellular uptake, Int. J. Nanomed., 12, 3207, 10.2147/IJN.S132369 · DOI
  117. Gupta, 2019, Effect of Oleic Acid Coating of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Properties of Magnetic Polyamide-6 Nanocomposite, JOM, 71, 3119, 10.1007/s11837-019-03622-5 · DOI
  118. Rodrigues, 2022, Scuffing resistance of polyalphaolefin (PAO)-based nanolubricants with oleic acid (OA) and iron oxide nanoparticles, Mater. Today Commun., 31, 103837, 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103837 · DOI
  119. Karaagac, 2019, Effects of biocompatible surfactants on structural and corresponding magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles coated by hydrothermal process, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 474, 332, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.053 · DOI
  120. Lammers, 2009, Simultaneous delivery of doxorubicin and gemcitabine to tumors in vivo using prototypic polymeric drug carriers, Biomaterials, 30, 3466, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.040 · DOI
  121. Frey, 2017, Synthesis, characterization and electrospinning of poly(vinyl caprolactam-co-hydroxymethyl acrylamide) to create stimuli-responsive nanofibers, Polymer, 108, 154, 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.053 · DOI · Paper page
  122. Rasool, 2019, Stimuli responsive biopolymer (chitosan) based blend hydrogels for wound healing application, Carbohydr. Polym., 203, 423, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.083 · DOI
  123. Pormohammad, A., Monych, N.K., Ghosh, S., Turner, D.L., and Turner, R.J. (2021). Nanomaterials in Wound Healing and Infection Control. Antibiotics, 10. · DOI
  124. Municoy, S., Álvarez Echazú, M.I., Antezana, P.E., Galdopórpora, J.M., Olivetti, C.E., Mebert, A.M., Foglia, M.L., Tuttolomondo, M.V., Álvarez, G.S., and Hardy, J.G. (2020). Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21. · DOI
  125. Wei, 2017, Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications, Polym. Chem., 8, 127, 10.1039/C6PY01585A · DOI
  126. Contreras-Cáceres, R., Cabeza, L., Perazzoli, G., Díaz, A., López-Romero, J.M., Melguizo, C., and Prados, J. (2019). Electrospun Nanofibers: Recent Applications in Drug Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Nanomaterials, 9. · DOI
  127. Das, S.S., Bharadwaj, P., Bilal, M., Barani, M., Rahdar, A., Taboada, P., Bungau, S., and Kyzas, G.Z. (2020). Stimuli-Responsive Polymeric Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery, Imaging, and Theragnosis. Polymers, 12. · DOI
  128. Hajebi, 2019, Stimulus-responsive polymeric nanogels as smart drug delivery systems, Acta Biomater., 92, 1, 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.018 · DOI
  129. Liu, 2016, The Smart Drug Delivery System and Its Clinical Potential, Theranostics, 6, 1306, 10.7150/thno.14858 · DOI · Paper page
  130. Singh, 2006, Stimuli-Responsive Materials: Thermo- and pH-Responsive Polymers for Drug Delivery, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 58, 1655, 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.020 · DOI · Paper page
  131. You, 2008, Temperature-controlled uptake and release in PNIPAM-modified porous silica nanoparticles, Chem. Mater., 20, 3354, 10.1021/cm703363w · DOI
  132. Lim, 2015, Nanomaterials for theranostics: Recent advances and future challenges, Chem. Rev., 115, 327, 10.1021/cr300213b · DOI
  133. Turan, S.K., Y1ld1zhan, H., Barkan, N.Q.n., Demiralp, F.D.Ö., Uslu, B., and Ozkan, S.A. (2018). Novel diagnostic techniques: Genomic, proteomic and systems biology approaches. Design of Nanostructures for Theranostics Applications, William Andrew Publishing. · DOI
  134. Hu, 2019, Upper critical solution temperature polymer-grafted hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for near-infrared-irradiated drug release, J. Mater. Chem. B, 7, 5789, 10.1039/C9TB01071H · DOI
  135. Nandwana, 2019, Magnetic Nanostructure-Coated Thermoresponsive Hydrogel Nanoconstruct As a Smart Multimodal Theranostic Platform, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 5, 3049, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00361 · DOI
  136. Raza, A., Rasheed, T., Nabeel, F., Hayat, U., Bilal, M., and Iqbal, H.M.N. (2019). Endogenous and Exogenous Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems for Programmed Site-Specific Release. Molecules, 24. · DOI
  137. Rao, 2018, Recent Progress and Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Polymers for Cancer Therapy, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 6, 110, 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00110 · DOI
  138. Ferjaoui, 2019, Doxorubicin Loaded Thermo-responsive Superparamagnetic Nanocarriers for Controlled Drug Delivery and Magnetic Hyperthermia Applications, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 30610, 10.1021/acsami.9b10444 · DOI
  139. Zhang, 2022, Thermo-responsive nano-in-micro particles for MRI-guided chemotherapy, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 134, 112716
  140. Low, 2022, Stimuli-controllable iron oxide nanoparticle assemblies: Design, manipulation and bio-applications, J. Control. Release: Off. J. Control. Release Soc., 345, 231, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.024 · DOI
  141. Lakshmanan, 2014, Physical energy for drug delivery; poration, concentration and activation, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 71, 98, 10.1016/j.addr.2013.05.010 · DOI
  142. Maniotis, 2019, Magneto-mechanical action of multimodal field configurations on magnetic nanoparticle environments, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 470, 6, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.12.024 · DOI
  143. Vangijzegem, 2019, Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for drug delivery: Applications and characteristics, Expert. Opin. Drug. Deliv., 16, 69, 10.1080/17425247.2019.1554647 · DOI
  144. Lee, 2017, Enhanced accumulation of theranostic nanoparticles in brain tumor by external magnetic field mediated in situ clustering of magnetic nanoparticles, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 54, 389, 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.019 · DOI
  145. Wang, 2022, Efficient exosome extraction through the conjugation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for the targeted delivery in rat brain, Mater. Today Chem., 23, 100637, 10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100637 · DOI
  146. Vilas-Boas, V., Carvalho, F., and Espina, B. (2020). Magnetic Hyperthermia for Cancer Treatment: Main Parameters Affecting the Outcome of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Molecules, 25. · DOI
  147. Kobayashi, 2011, Cancer hyperthermia using magnetic nanoparticles, Biotechnol. J., 6, 1342, 10.1002/biot.201100045 · DOI · Paper page
  148. Odio, 2019, Flower-like Mn-doped magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with αvβ3-integrin-ligand to efficiently induce intracellular heat after AMF-exposition triggering glioma cell death, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 26648, 10.1021/acsami.9b08318 · DOI
  149. Palzer, J., Eckstein, L., Slabu, I., Reisen, O., Neumann, U.P., and Roeth, A.A. (2021). Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Based Hyperthermia as a Treatment Option in Various Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Nanomaterials, 11. · DOI
  150. Yang, 2021, Multifunctional L-arginine-based magnetic nanoparticles for multiple-synergistic tumor therapy, Biomater. Sci., 9, 2230, 10.1039/D0BM01932A · DOI
  151. Tagami, 2011, MRI monitoring of intratumoral drug delivery and prediction of the therapeutic effect with a multifunctional thermosensitive liposome, Biomaterials, 32, 6570, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.029 · DOI
  152. Dan, 2014, Alternating Magnetic Field-Induced Hyperthermia Increases Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Cell Association/Uptake and Flux in Bloo Brain Barrier Models, Pharm. Res., 32, 1615, 10.1007/s11095-014-1561-6 · DOI
  153. Carter, 2021, Potential of Magnetic Hyperthermia to Stimulate Localized Immune Activation, Small, 17, e2005241, 10.1002/smll.202005241 · DOI
  154. Espinosa, 2016, Duality of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy: Amplification of Heating Efficiency by Magnetic Hyperthermia and Photothermal Bimodal Treatment, ACS Nano, 10, 2436, 10.1021/acsnano.5b07249 · DOI
  155. Thorat, 2016, Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanocargoes for combined cancer thermotherapy and MRI applications, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. PCCP, 18, 21331, 10.1039/C6CP03430F · DOI
  156. Amin, M., Huang, W.-L., Seynhaeve, A.L.B., and ten Hagen, T.L.M. (2020). Hyperthermia and Temperature-Sensitive Nanomaterials for Spatiotemporal Drug Delivery to Solid Tumors. Pharmaceutics, 12. · DOI
  157. Shi, 2019, Glioma-targeted dual functionalized thermosensitive Ferri-liposomes for drug delivery through an in vitro blood-brain barrier, Nanoscale, 11, 15057, 10.1039/C9NR03931G · DOI
  158. Habash, 2006, Thermal therapy, part 2: Hyperthermia techniques, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 34, 491, 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v34.i6.30 · DOI
  159. Kumar, 2011, Magnetic nanomaterials for hyperthermia-based therapy and controlled drug delivery, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 63, 789, 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.008 · DOI
  160. Li, 2015, Hyaluronic acid-modified Fe3O4@Au core/shell nanostars for multimodal imaging and photothermal therapy of tumors, Biomaterials, 38, 10, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.065 · DOI
  161. Revia, 2016, Magnetite nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and treatment monitoring: Recent advances, Mater. Today, 19, 157, 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.08.022 · DOI
  162. Ray, 2019, Magnetic Heating Stimulated Cargo Release with Dose Control using Multifunctional MR and Thermosensitive Liposome, Nanotheranostics, 3, 166, 10.7150/ntno.31164 · DOI
  163. Asl, H.M. (2017). Applications of Nanoparticles in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comprehensive Review. Asian J. Pharm., 11.
  164. Vuong, 2017, Magnetic resonance relaxation induced by superparamagnetic particles used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging: A theoretical review, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol., 9, e1468, 10.1002/wnan.1468 · DOI
  165. Buxton, R.B. (2009). Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  166. Hu, 2012, Inorganic nanoparticle-based T1 and T1/T2 magnetic resonance contrast probes, Nanoscale, 4, 6235, 10.1039/c2nr31865b · DOI
  167. Caravan, 1999, Gadolinium(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Structure, Dynamics, and Applications, Chem. Rev., 99, 2293, 10.1021/cr980440x · DOI
  168. Kanda, 2014, High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: Relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material, Radiology, 270, 834, 10.1148/radiol.13131669 · DOI
  169. Stojanov, 2016, Gadolinium deposition within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agent“ current status, Neuroradiology, 58, 433, 10.1007/s00234-016-1658-1 · DOI
  170. Olchowy, C., Cebulski, K., Aasecki, M., Chaber, R., Olchowy, A., KbBwak, K., and Zaleska-Dorobisz, U. (2017). The presence of the gadolinium-based contrast agent depositions in the brain and symptoms of gadolinium neurotoxicity—A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 12. · DOI
  171. Peng, 2016, Chemical design of nanoprobes for T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, Mater. Today, 19, 336, 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.006 · DOI
  172. Heine, 2014, The cell-type specific uptake of polymer-coated or micelle-embedded QDs and SPIOs does not provoke an acute pro-inflammatory response in the liver, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 5, 1432, 10.3762/bjnano.5.155 · DOI
  173. Sheel, 2020, Molecular intrinsic proximal interaction infer oxidative stress and apoptosis modulated in vivo biocompatibility of P.niruri contrived antibacterial iron oxide nanoparticles with zebrafish, Environ. Pollut., 267, 115482, 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115482 · DOI
  174. Kwon, 2018, Large-Scale Synthesis and Medical Applications of Uniform-Sized Metal Oxide Nanoparticles, Adv. Mater., 30, e1704290, 10.1002/adma.201704290 · DOI
  175. Bao, 2018, Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as T1 contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging, J. Mater. Chem. C, 6, 1280, 10.1039/C7TC05854C · DOI
  176. Thanh, N.T.K. (2018). Clinical Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles: From Fabrication to Clinical Applications, CRC Press.
  177. Corot, 2006, Recent advances in iron oxide nanocrystal technology for medical imaging, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev., 58, 1471, 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.013 · DOI
  178. Shu, 2021, Sialic acid-engineered mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles loaded with SPIO and Fe, Bioact. Mater., 6, 1423
  179. Fernández-Barahona, I., Muñoz-Hernando, M., Ruiz-Cabello, J., Herranz, F., and Pellico, J. (2020). Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: An Alternative for Positive Contrast in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Inorganics, 8. · DOI
  180. Lu, 2018, Highly Sensitive Diagnosis of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using pH-Responsive Iron Oxide Nanocluster Assemblies, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 140, 10071, 10.1021/jacs.8b04169 · DOI
  181. Wang, 2020, ENOQ targeted superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for detecting pancreatic cancer by magnetic resonance imaging, J. Cell. Mol. Med., 24, 5751, 10.1111/jcmm.15237 · DOI
  182. Sridharan, 2021, nCP:Fe Nanocontrast Agent for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Early Detection of Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 4, 3398, 10.1021/acsabm.1c00001 · DOI
  183. Anna, 2019, nCP: A Biomineral Magnetic Nanocontrast Agent for Tracking Implanted Stem Cells in Brain Using MRI, ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 2, 5390, 10.1021/acsabm.9b00709 · DOI
  184. Uppalapati, 2016, Conducting polymers with defined micro- or nanostructures for drug delivery, Biomaterials, 111, 149, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.021 · DOI
  185. Casella, 2021, Endogenous Electric Signaling as a Blueprint for Conductive Materials in Tissue Engineering, Bioelectricity, 3, 27, 10.1089/bioe.2020.0027 · DOI
  186. Kotnik, 2019, Membrane Electroporation and Electropermeabilization: Mechanisms and Models, Annu. Rev. Biophys., 48, 63, 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115451 · DOI · Paper page
  187. Prakash, P., and Srimathveeravalli, G. (2021). Principles and Technologies for Electromagnetic Energy Based Therapies, Academic Press.
  188. Viratchaiboott, 2022, Release of 5-FU Loaded Pectin/Fe3O4 from Porous PBSA Matrix under Magnetic and Electric Fields, J. Alloys Compd., 906, 164239, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164239 · DOI
  189. Benson, 2018, Tumor Treating Fields Technology: Alternating Electric Field Therapy for the Treatment of Solid Tumors, Semin. Oncol. Nurs., 34, 137, 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.03.005 · DOI
  190. Raza, 2018, Redox-responsive nano-carriers as tumor-targeted drug delivery systems, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 157, 705, 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.08.034 · DOI
  191. Molaei, 2020, Polyethylenimine-graft-poly (maleic anhydride-alt-1-octadecene) coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles: Promising targeted pH-sensitive system for curcumin delivery and MR imaging, Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater., 70, 1
  192. Nalluri, 2020, Synthesis of biopolymer coated functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for the pH-sensitive delivery of anti-cancer drugs epirubicin and temozolomide, Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater., 70, 1
  193. Banstola, 2021, Recent progress in stimuli-responsive nanosystems for inducing immunogenic cell death, J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc., 337, 505, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.038 · DOI
  194. Saadat, 2021, Drug delivery of pH-Sensitive nanoparticles into the liver cancer cells, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol., 63, 102557, 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102557 · DOI
  195. Guo, 2018, Advances in redox-responsive drug delivery systems of tumor microenvironment, J. Nanobiotechnol., 16, 74, 10.1186/s12951-018-0398-2 · DOI · Paper page
  196. Tang, 2016, Redox-responsive star-shaped magnetic micelles with active-targeted and magnetic-guided functions for cancer therapy, Acta Biomater., 42, 232, 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.038 · DOI · Paper page
  197. Chen, 2015, A redox stimuli-responsive superparamagnetic nanogel with chemically anchored DOX for enhanced anticancer efficacy and low systemic adverse effects, J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 8949, 10.1039/C5TB01851J · DOI
  198. Mousavi, 2018, Doxorubicin delivery via magnetic nanomicelles comprising from reduction-responsive poly(ethylene glycol)bpoly(epsiloncaprolactone) (PEG-SS-PCL) and loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization and simulation, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 92, 631, 10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.066 · DOI
  199. Yang, 2017, Multifunctional and Redox-Responsive Self-Assembled Magnetic Nanovectors for Protein Delivery and Dual-Modal Imaging, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 19184, 10.1021/acsami.7b03747 · DOI
  200. Shang, 2017, Preparation of polydopamine based redox-sensitive magnetic nanoparticles for doxorubicin delivery and MRI detection, J. Bioresour. Bioprod., 2, 67

200 of 323 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aram, E., Moeni, M., Abedizadeh, R., Sabour, D., Sadeghi-Abandansari, H., Gardy, J., & Hassanpour, A.
Venue
Nanomaterials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-10-12
Volume
12
Issue
20
Pages
3567
ISSN
2079-4991
DOI
10.3390/nano12203567
PMC
PMC9611246
Cited by
66
References
6
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Royan institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review