Cited by 119Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Effect of Caffeine Supplementation on Sports Performance Based on Differences Between Sexes: A Systematic Review

Open access
Mielgo-Ayuso, Juan, Marques-Jiménez, Diego, Refoyo, Ignacio, Del Coso, Juan, León-Guereño, Patxi, Calleja-González, Julio·2019·Nutrients

Abstract

Most studies that have shown the positive effects of caffeine supplementation on sports performance have been carried out on men. However, the differences between sexes are evident in terms of body size, body composition, and hormonal functioning, which might cause different outcomes on performance for the same dosage of caffeine intake in men vs. women. The main aim of this systematic review was to analyze and compare the effects of caffeine intake between men and women on sports performance to provide a source of knowledge to sports practitioners and coaches, especially for those working with women athletes, on the use of caffeine as an ergogenic aid. A structured search was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases until 28 July 2019. The search included studies in which the effects of caffeine supplementation on athletic performance were compared between sexes and to an identical placebo situation (dose, duration and timing). No filters were applied for participants’ physical fitness level or age. A total of 254 articles were obtained in the initial search. When applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample was 10 articles. The systematic review concluded that four investigations (100% of the number of investigations on this topic) had not found differences between sexes in terms of caffeine supplementation on aerobic performance and 3/3 (100%) on the fatigue index. However, four out of seven articles (57.1%) showed that the ergogenicity of caffeine for anaerobic performance was higher in men than women. In particular, it seems that men are able to produce more power, greater total weight lifted and more speed with the same dose of caffeine than women. In summary, caffeine supplementation produced a similar ergogenic benefit for aerobic performance and the fatigue index in men and women athletes. Nevertheless, the effects of caffeine to produce more power, total weight lifted and to improve sprint performance with respect to a placebo was higher in men than women athletes despite the same dose of caffeine being administered. Thus, the ergogenic effect of acute caffeine intake on anaerobic performance might be higher in men than in women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu11102313

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Erogenicity was reduced in habituated caffeine users unless ingestion of an acute dose of caffeine equivalent to the athlete's daily caffeine ingestion is used.

    “but erogenicity was reduced in habituated caffeine users unless ingestion of an acute dose of caffeine equivalent to the athlete’s daily caffeine ingestion is used [294,295].”

    From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [295]

    The Introduction describes general caffeine doses for improving performance, and the Methodology lists habitual caffeine intake as data extracted from studies. Neither passage says that habitual use reduces caffeine’s ergogenic effect or that an acute dose equivalent to daily intake preserves it. Searches for habitual and daily caffeine intake found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Green S. Higgins J.P. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.0.2 The Cochrane Library Wiley Online Library Chichester, West Sussex, UK 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mielgo-Ayuso, J., Marques-Jiménez, D., Refoyo, I., Del Coso, J., León-Guereño, P., & Calleja-González, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
  • Academy Department, Deportivo Alavés SAD, 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
  • Centre for Sport Studies. Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Spain
  • Universidad de Deusto (ES)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
2313
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975033092
Cited by
119
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DeustoTeka (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivo Digital UPM (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
caffeine supplementation, athletic performance, sex differences, ergogenic aids, anaerobic performance, aerobic performance, fatigue, female athletes, output power, sprint performance, weightlifting
MeSH terms
Adult, Caffeine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Physical Endurance, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Performance-Enhancing Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review