Cited by 20Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Acute effects of two caffeine doses on bar velocity during the bench press exercise among women habituated to caffeine: a randomized, crossover, double-blind study involving control and placebo conditions

Open access
Filip-Stachnik, Aleksandra, Krzysztofik, Michal, Del Coso, Juan, Wilk, Michal·2022·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Purpose: The main goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two different doses of caffeine (3 and 6 mg/kg) to enhance bar velocity during the bench press in women habituated to caffeine. Methods: Twelve recreationally trained women (age: 23.3 ± 0.8 years, body mass: 60.7 ± 5.7 kg, bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM): 44.3 ± 7.8 kg, daily caffeine ingestion: 5.7 ± 2.0 mg/kg/day) participated in a randomized double-blind experimental design. Each participant performed four different experimental sessions: after no supplementation (control, CON), after ingesting 3 and 6 mg/kg of caffeine (CAF-3 and CAF-6, respectively), or after ingesting a placebo (PLAC). In each experimental session, the participants performed 3 sets of 3 repetitions of the bench press exercise at 50% 1RM. Results: A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with subsequent post hoc analyses indicated significant increases in peak velocity ( p < 0.01; ES = 0.91) and mean velocity ( p < 0.01; ES = 0.78) after the intake of CAF-6 compared to CON. The study did not show significant differences in bar velocity between CAF-6 and PLAC and between CAF-3 and PLAC. No significant differences in bar velocity were observed between CAF-3 and CAF-6 conditions. Conclusion: These results suggest that 6 mg/kg of caffeine can be an effective dose to improve power-specific training outcomes in women habituated to caffeine. However, the ergogenic effect of 6 mg/kg of caffeine may be derived from a combination of biological effects and expectancy, as this dose was only superior to the control condition with no differences over the placebo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-021-02708-8

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Erogenicity was reduced in habituated caffeine users unless ingestion of an acute dose of caffeine equivalent to the athlete's daily caffeine ingestion is used.

    “but erogenicity was reduced in habituated caffeine users unless ingestion of an acute dose of caffeine equivalent to the athlete’s daily caffeine ingestion is used [294,295].”

    From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Conclusion reports that, in women habituated to caffeine, a dose similar to their daily intake may be needed for an ergogenic effect on bench-press bar velocity; the 3 mg/kg dose did not reach statistical significance. The claim extends that qualified, exercise-specific finding to habituated caffeine users generally and states the dose requirement more categorically than the paper does. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Filip-Stachnik, A., Krzysztofik, M., Del Coso, J., & Wilk, M.
Affiliations
Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego im. Jerzego Kukuczki w Katowicach (PL)
Corresponding author
Filip-Stachnik, Aleksandra
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2021-10-19
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
947-955
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W3205770722
Cited by
20
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
caffeine, caffeine dose-response, bar velocity, bench press, women, ergogenic aids, power training, placebo effect, expectancy effects, resistance training
MeSH terms
Adult, Caffeine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Performance-Enhancing Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review