The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design, Implementation and Practical Evaluation of an IoT Home Automation System for Fog Computing Applications Based on MQTT and ZigBee-WiFi Sensor Nodes
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, the improvement of wireless protocols, the development of cloud services and the lower cost of hardware have started a new era for smart homes. One such enabling technologies is fog computing, which extends cloud computing to the edge of a network allowing for developing novel Internet of Things (IoT) applications and services. Under the IoT fog computing paradigm, IoT gateways are usually utilized to exchange messages with IoT nodes and a cloud. WiFi and ZigBee stand out as preferred communication technologies for smart homes. WiFi has become very popular, but it has a limited application due to its high energy consumption and the lack of standard mesh networking capabilities for low-power devices. For such reasons, ZigBee was selected by many manufacturers for developing wireless home automation devices. As a consequence, these technologies may coexist in the 2.4 GHz band, which leads to collisions, lower speed rates and increased communications latencies. This article presents ZiWi, a distributed fog computing Home Automation System (HAS) that allows for carrying out seamless communications among ZigBee and WiFi devices. This approach diverges from traditional home automation systems, which often rely on expensive central controllers. In addition, to ease the platform’s building process, whenever possible, the system makes use of open-source software (all the code of the nodes is available on GitHub) and Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) hardware. The initial results, which were obtained in a number of representative home scenarios, show that the developed fog services respond several times faster than the evaluated cloud services, and that cross-interference has to be taken seriously to prevent collisions. In addition, the current consumption of ZiWi’s nodes was measured, showing the impact of encryption mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244
A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things
Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2842685 · Cited by 1,078
Self-citationTowards the Internet of Smart Trains: A Review on Industrial IoT-Connected Railways
Fraga-Lamas, P., Fernández-Caramés, T., & Castedo, L. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17061457 · Cited by 267
Self-citationA Review on Internet of Things for Defense and Public Safety
Fraga-Lamas, P., Fernández-Caramés, T., Suárez-Albela, M., Castedo, L., & González-López, M. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16101644 · Cited by 242
Self-citationBlanco-Novoa, O., Fernandez-Carames, T. M., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Vilar-Montesinos, M. A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2802699 · Cited by 183
Self-citationSuárez-Albela, M., Fernández-Caramés, T., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Castedo, L. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17091978 · Cited by 125
Self-citationVineSens: An Eco-Smart Decision-Support Viticulture System
Pérez-Expósito, J., Fernández-Caramés, T., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Castedo, L. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17030465 · Cited by 86
Self-citationReverse engineering and security evaluation of commercial tags for RFID-based IoT applications
Fernández-Caramés, T., Fraga-Lamas, P., Suárez-Albela, M., & Castedo, L. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17010028 · Cited by 81
Self-citationAn Electricity Price-Aware Open-Source Smart Socket for the Internet of Energy
Blanco-Novoa, Ó., Fernández-Caramés, T., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Castedo, L. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17030643 · Cited by 76
Self-citationSmart Pipe System for a Shipyard 4.0
Fraga-Lamas, P., Noceda-Davila, D., Fernández-Caramés, T., Díaz-Bouza, M., & Vilar-Montesinos, M. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16122186 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Cited by
Edge Machine Learning for AI-Enabled IoT Devices: A Review
Merenda, M., Porcaro, C., & Iero, D. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20092533 · Cited by 523
Fernández-Caramés, T., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2018) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics7120405 · Cited by 359
Self-citationFernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2908780 · Cited by 321
Self-citationFernández-Caramés, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9214479 · Cited by 156
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Froiz-Míguez, I., Fernández-Caramés, T. M., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Castedo, L.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-08-13
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2660
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2886287510
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design, Implementation and Practical Evaluation of an IoT Home Automation System for Fog Computing Applications Based on MQTT and ZigBee-WiFi Sensor Nodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s18082660
- The paper
- Froiz-Míguez, I., Fernández-Caramés, T. M., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Castedo, L. (2018). Design, Implementation and Practical Evaluation of an IoT Home Automation System for Fog Computing Applications Based on MQTT and ZigBee-WiFi Sensor Nodes. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.