Cited by 390Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood Pressure Estimation from Photoplethysmogram Using a Spectro-Temporal Deep Neural Network

Open access

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is a direct indicator of hypertension, a dangerous and potentially deadly condition. Regular monitoring of BP is thus important, but many people have aversion towards cuff-based devices, and their limitation is that they can only be used at rest. Using just a photoplethysmogram (PPG) to estimate BP is a potential solution investigated in our study. We analyzed the MIMIC III database for high-quality PPG and arterial BP waveforms, resulting in over 700 h of signals after preprocessing, belonging to 510 subjects. We then used the PPG alongside its first and second derivative as inputs into a novel spectro-temporal deep neural network with residual connections. We have shown in a leave-one-subject-out experiment that the network is able to model the dependency between PPG and BP, achieving mean absolute errors of 9.43 for systolic and 6.88 for diastolic BP. Additionally we have shown that personalization of models is important and substantially improves the results, while deriving a good general predictive model is difficult. We have made crucial parts of our study, especially the list of used subjects and our neural network code, publicly available, in an effort to provide a solid baseline and simplify potential comparison between future studies on an explicit MIMIC III subset.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s19153420

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Ideal photoplethysmogram (PPG) cycle waveform and its first and second derivatives next to distorted waveforms. The ideal example has a single large systolic peak and a single lower diastolic peak afterwards, while the anomalies have too many or too few peaks. All data is taken from the MIMIC III database [11].
Figure 1 Ideal photoplethysmogram (PPG) cycle waveform and its first and second derivatives next to distorted waveforms. The ideal example has a single large systolic peak and a single lower diastolic peak afterwards, while the anomalies have too many or too few peaks. All data is taken from the MIMIC III database [11].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Flat lines anomaly can be observed in the arterial blood pressure (ABP) signal.
Figure 2 Flat lines anomaly can be observed in the arterial blood pressure (ABP) signal.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Flat peaks anomaly can be observed in the ABP signal.
Figure 3 Flat peaks anomaly can be observed in the ABP signal.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Schematic pipeline of our system.
Figure 4 Schematic pipeline of our system.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Distributions of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and distolic blood pressure (DBP) in our final data.
Figure 5 Distributions of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and distolic blood pressure (DBP) in our final data.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Schematic showing of our neural network architecture.
Figure 6 Schematic showing of our neural network architecture.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lake, C., Hines, R., and Blitt, C. (2001). Pulse oximeter waveform: Photoelectric plethysmography. Clinical Monitoring, WB Saunders Company.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Slapničar, G., Mlakar, N., & Luštrek, M.
Affiliations
  • Jožef Stefan Institute (SI)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Slapničar, Gašper
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-08-04
Volume
19
Issue
15
Pages
3420
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965846681
Cited by
387
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 23
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Commission (689660)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
blood pressure estimation, photoplethysmogram, skip connections, hypertension monitoring, cuffless blood pressure measurement, model personalization, MIMIC-III
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Blood Pressure, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review