Cited by 14Public Procurement and PolicyEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Supply Chain Management

Municipal Green Purchasing in Mexico: Policy Adoption and Implementation Success

Open access
Leal, Ana R., Perez-Castillo, David, Amorós, José Ernesto, Husted, Bryan W.·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to determine what factors drive the adoption of green purchasing among municipalities in Mexico and the success of their implementation. Given the lack of research and theory in the area, this study is exploratory in nature. We applied the green purchasing survey developed by Arizona State University to all municipalities in Mexico with a population of 25,000 or more inhabitants. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selector operator method (LASSO), we reduced the set of measures, which we then employed in a logistic regression to predict whether the municipality would adopt a green purchasing policy. We found that complementary environmental practices, department rules, and city-wide contracts to reduce purchasing costs have a positive and significant effect on the propensity to adopt green purchasing policies, but the time for routine low-cost purchases has a negative effect on green purchasing policy adoption. Then, using two-stage least squares, we developed a model of the factors leading to successful implementation of green purchasing. We found that complementary environmental policies, environmental practices, environmental program knowledge, and city-wide contracts to reduce purchasing costs are positively and significantly related to successful implementation. However, department resources and the time for routine low-cost purchase are significant, but negatively related.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12208339

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leal, A. R., Perez-Castillo, D., Amorós, J. E., & Husted, B. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Monterrey (MX)
  • EGADE Business School, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García 66269, Mexico
  • Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Corresponding author
Husted, Bryan W.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-10
Volume
12
Issue
20
Pages
8339
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091787128
Cited by
14
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Global Consortium for Sustainable Outcomes (001036)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
green purchasing, municipal sustainability, policy adoption, policy implementation, local government, environmental practices, acquisition cost, Mexico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review