CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eco-Innovation Diversity in a Circular Economy: Towards Circular Innovation Studies

de Jesus, Ana, Lammi, Minna, Domenech, Teresa, Vanhuyse, Fedra, Mendonça, Sandro·2021·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su131910974
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Transition to a Circular Economy (CE) is about structural change and is predicated on the introduction of transformative eco-innovation (EI). Research on the CE–EI nexus has recently attracted attention both from an analytical and regulatory perspective. However, in-depth research exploring EI dynamics within the CE is still marginal, especially concerning the trends and dynamics of the pro-CE innovation policy and strategy. This paper addresses this gap by taking advantage of the burgeoning research on CE of the last 20 years and offers a new working synthesis. By implementing a “(systematic) review of (systematic) reviews”, this paper provides a new comprehensive framework for understanding pro-circular innovation strategies and, as a complement, argues the need to advance “circular innovation studies” as an agenda in its own right. Innovations related to recycling and recovery CE strategies along with business-model innovations and systemic/transformative innovations are found to be a major current trend in the research, connecting supply and demand side innovations and also driving other forms of innovation linked to design, product manufacturing, logistics and reverse logistics and end-of-life management and recovery. Additionally, of note is that the conceptual understanding of EI dynamics within a CE is still mainly implicit (rather than explicitly discussed) limiting the possibilities to advance knowledge in the area of innovation for CE: this is why we propose a “circular innovation studies” agenda.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su131910974

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Data collection procedures. * was used to find wildcards in an exact word. For example, in 'innovat*' to find "innovation' as well as 'innovating' or 'innovator'.
Figure 1 Data collection procedures. * was used to find wildcards in an exact word. For example, in 'innovat*' to find "innovation' as well as 'innovating' or 'innovator'.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Number of papers per year on circularity and innovation. Source: elaborations on the corpus. Note: performance for later years can be underestimated, given to database updating.
Figure 2 Number of papers per year on circularity and innovation. Source: elaborations on the corpus. Note: performance for later years can be underestimated, given to database updating.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Number of papers per journal. Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 3 Number of papers per journal. Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 ( a ) Number of papers per year divided by nature of the research; ( b ) Overall % of papers per nature of the research. Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 4 ( a ) Number of papers per year divided by nature of the research; ( b ) Overall % of papers per nature of the research. Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Geographical focus of the examples mentioned on the sample. Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 5 Geographical focus of the examples mentioned on the sample. Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 ( a ) Main innovation mechanisms in the corpus; ( b ) Main impact in the corpus. Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 6 ( a ) Main innovation mechanisms in the corpus; ( b ) Main impact in the corpus. Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 Main types of innovation in the corpus. Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 7 Main types of innovation in the corpus. Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Main CE strategies (organised according to stages of the value chain). Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 8 Main CE strategies (organised according to stages of the value chain). Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 ( a ) Main types of innovation per 'Recycling and recovery' CE strategy (value chain); ( b ) Main mechanisms of innovation per 'Recycling and recovery' CE strategy (value chain). Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 9 ( a ) Main types of innovation per 'Recycling and recovery' CE strategy (value chain); ( b ) Main mechanisms of innovation per 'Recycling and recovery' CE strategy (value chain). Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 10 ( a ) Main types of innovation per 'New Business Models' CE strategy (value chain); ( b ) Main mechanisms of innovation per 'New Business Models' CE strategy (value chain). Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 10 ( a ) Main types of innovation per 'New Business Models' CE strategy (value chain); ( b ) Main mechanisms of innovation per 'New Business Models' CE strategy (value chain). Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 11 Main types of innovation in papers that do not focus on any of the CE strategies. Source: elaborations on the corpus.
Figure 11 Main types of innovation in papers that do not focus on any of the CE strategies. Source: elaborations on the corpus.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 130

  1. Steffen, 2009, A Safe Operating Space for Humanity, Nature, 461, 472, 10.1038/461472a · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2021, Circular Economy: Laying the Foundations for Conceptual and Theoretical Development in Management Studies, Manag. Decis., 59, 1209, 10.1108/MD-05-2019-0587 · DOI
  3. Geissdoerfer, 2017, The Circular Economy—A New Sustainability Paradigm?, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Korhonen, 2018, Circular Economy: The Concept and Its Limitations, Ecol. Econ., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Centobelli, 2020, Designing Business Models in Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda, Bus. Strategy Environ., 29, 1734, 10.1002/bse.2466 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Denise, 2018, The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 246, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · DOI
  7. Bernard, 2016, Environmental Sciences, Sustainable Development and Circular Economy: Alternative Concepts for Trans-Disciplinary Research, Environ. Dev., 17, 48, 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002 · DOI
  8. Antunes, 2018, Eco-Innovation in the Transition to a Circular Economy: An Analytical Literature Review, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 2999, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.111 · DOI
  9. 2020, Energy Efficiency of Latent Heat Storage Systems in Residential Buildings: Coupled Effects of Wall Assembly and Climatic Conditions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev., 132, 110097, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110097 · DOI
  10. Hamam, M., Chinnici, G., Di Vita, G., Pappalardo, G., Pecorino, B., Maesano, G., and D’Amico, M. (2021). Circular Economy Models in Agro-Food Systems: A Review. Sustainability, 13. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Piribauer, 2019, Textile Recycling Processes, State of the Art and Current Developments: A Mini Review, Waste Manag. Res., 37, 112, 10.1177/0734242X18819277 · DOI
  12. Calleja, 2019, Why the “New Plastics Economy” Must Be a Circular Economy, Field Actions Sci. Rep., 2019, 22
  13. Gong, 2020, Investigation into Circular Economy of Plastics: The Case of the UK Fast Moving Consumer Goods Industry, J. Clean. Prod., 244, 118941, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118941 · DOI
  14. Mishra, 2021, The Anatomy of Circular Economy Transition in the Fashion Industry, Soc. Responsib. J., 17, 524, 10.1108/SRJ-06-2019-0216 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Shirvanimoghaddam, 2020, Death by Waste: Fashion and Textile Circular Economy Case, Sci. Total. Environ., 718, 137317, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137317 · DOI
  16. Althaf, 2021, The Evolution of Consumer Electronic Waste in the United States, J. Ind. Ecol., 25, 693, 10.1111/jiec.13074 · DOI
  17. Althaf, 2019, Forecasting Electronic Waste Flows for Effective Circular Economy Planning, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 151, 104362, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.038 · DOI
  18. Álvarez-de-los-Mozos, E., Rentería-Bilbao, A., and Díaz-Martín, F. (2020). WEEE Recycling and Circular Economy Assisted by Collaborative Robots. Appl. Sci., 10. · DOI
  19. Peschel, 2019, How Circular Will You Eat? The Sustainability Challenge in Food and Consumer Reaction to Either Waste-to-Value or yet Underused Novel Ingredients in Food, Food Qual. Prefer., 77, 15, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  20. MacDonald, 2020, Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs from Agro-Food System Redesign for Circularity: A Case Study with the FAN Agent-Based Model, Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 4, 41, 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00041 · DOI
  21. Calabrese, 2018, Sustainability-Oriented Service Innovation: An Emerging Research Field, J. Clean. Prod., 193, 533, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.073 · DOI
  22. Fernandes, 2020, Towards Product-Service System Oriented to Circular Economy: A Systematic Review of Value Proposition Design Approaches, J. Clean. Prod., 257, 120507, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120507 · DOI
  23. Skene, 2017, Circles, Spirals, Pyramids and Cubes: Why the Circular Economy Cannot Work, Sustain. Sci., 13, 1
  24. Kalmykova, 2018, Circular Economy—From Review of Theories and Practices to Development of Implementation Tools, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., and Green, K. (2004). System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing. · DOI
  26. Geels, 2008, The Dynamics of Sustainable Innovation Journeys, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 20, 521, 10.1080/09537320802292982 · DOI
  27. Antunes, 2019, Eco-Innovation Pathways to a Circular Economy: Envisioning Priorities through a Delphi Approach, J. Clean. Prod., 228, 1494, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.049 · DOI
  28. 2018, Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-Innovation Road to the Circular Economy, Ecol. Econ., 145, 75, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Innes, 2010, Environmental Innovation and Environmental Performance, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 59, 27, 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.003 · DOI
  30. Truffer, 2011, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions: Introduction and Overview, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.010 · DOI
  31. Weber, K.M., and Hemmelskamp, J. (2005). Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, Springer Science & Business Media. · DOI
  32. Boons, 2013, Sustainable Innovation, Business Models and Economic Performance: An Overview, J. Clean. Prod., 45, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013 · DOI
  33. Chen, 2006, The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan, J. Bus. Ethics, 67, 331, 10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Cuerva, 2014, Drivers of Green and Non-Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence in Low-Tech SMEs, J. Clean. Prod., 68, 104, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.049 · DOI
  35. Li, 2020, Green Innovation and Business Sustainability: New Evidence from Energy Intensive Industry in China, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 1
  36. Horbach, 2008, Determinants of Environmental Innovation—New Evidence from German Panel Data Sources, Res. Policy, 37, 163, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006 · DOI
  37. 2010, Diversity of Eco-Innovations: Reflections from Selected Case Studies, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 1073, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Hofstra, 2014, Eco-Innovations Characterized: A Taxonomic Classification of Relationships between Humans and Nature, J. Clean. Prod., 66, 459, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.036 · DOI
  39. Jo, 2015, Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe, Sustainability, 7, 16820, 10.3390/su71215849 · DOI
  40. Martin, 2016, Twenty Challenges for Innovation Studies, Sci. Public Policy, 43, 432, 10.1093/scipol/scv077 · DOI
  41. Schot, 2018, Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality, Res. Policy, 47, 1045, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009 · DOI
  42. Konietzko, 2020, Circular Ecosystem Innovation: An Initial Set of Principles, J. Clean. Prod., 253, 119942, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942 · DOI
  43. Brewerton, P.M., and Millward, L. (2001). Organizational Research Methods: A Guide for Students and Researchers, SAGE Publications. [1st ed.]. · DOI
  44. Denyer, D., and Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, Sage Publications Ltd.
  45. Tranfield, 2003, Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review, Br. J. Manag., 14, 207
  46. Merli, 2018, How Do Scholars Approach the Circular Economy? A Systematic Literature Review, J. Clean. Prod., 178, 703, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
  47. Xavier, 2017, Systematic Literature Review of Eco-Innovation Models: Opportunities and Recommendations for Future Research, J. Clean. Prod., 149, 1278, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.145 · DOI
  48. Akhimien, 2021, Application of Circular Economy Principles in Buildings: A Systematic Review, J. Build. Eng., 38, 102041, 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102041 · DOI
  49. Bocken, N., Strupeit, L., Whalen, K., and Nußholz, J. (2019). A Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
  50. Lago, 2021, Food Loss and Waste in the Context of the Circular Economy: A Systematic Review, J. Clean. Prod., 294, 126284, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126284 · DOI
  51. Rosa, 2020, Assessing Relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review, Int. J. Prod. Res., 58, 1662, 10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896 · DOI
  52. Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., and Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12. · DOI
  53. Arbolino, 2021, A Systematic Review for Measuring Circular Economy: The 61 Indicators, J. Clean. Prod., 281, 124942, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124942 · DOI
  54. Martinho, 2021, Insights into Circular Economy Indicators: Emphasizing Dimensions of Sustainability, Environ. Sustain. Indic., 10, 100119
  55. Sassanelli, 2019, Circular Economy Performance Assessment Methods: A Systematic Literature Review, J. Clean. Prod., 229, 440, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019 · DOI
  56. 2018, The Nature and Variety of Innovation, Int. J. Innov. Stud., 2, 65, 10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.004 · DOI
  57. Colvin, 2014, In Search of Systemic Innovation for Sustainable Development: A Design Praxis Emerging from a Decade of Social Learning Inquiry, Res. Policy, 43, 760, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.010 · DOI
  58. Gaziulusoy, 2013, System Innovation for Sustainability: A Systemic Double-Flow Scenario Method for Companies, J. Clean. Prod., 45, 104, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.013 · DOI
  59. Boons, 2013, Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State-of-the-Art and Steps towards a Research Agenda, J. Clean. Prod., 45, 9, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Geissdoerfer, 2018, Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Review, J. Clean. Prod., 198, 401, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240 · DOI
  61. Zhu, 2020, A Tale of Two Databases: The Use of Web of Science and Scopus in Academic Papers, Scientometrics, 123, 321, 10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Chappin, 2014, Transition and Transformation: A Bibliometric Analysis of Two Scientific Networks Researching Socio-Technical Change, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 30, 715, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.013 · DOI
  63. Chadegani, A.A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., and Ebrahim, A.E. (2013). Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases, Social Science Research Network. · DOI
  64. Haddaway, 2020, What Evidence Exists on Conservation Actions to Conserve Insects? A Protocol for a Systematic Map of Literature Reviews, Environ. Evid., 9, 30, 10.1186/s13750-020-00214-8 · DOI
  65. Higgins, J.P., and Green, S. (2009). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, The Cochrane Collaboration. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Camón Luis, E., and Celma, D. (2020). Circular Economy. A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 12. · DOI
  67. Buchheim, 2020, Innovation Types in Public Sector Organizations: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Manag. Rev. Q., 70, 509, 10.1007/s11301-019-00174-5 · DOI
  68. Bown, 2010, Quality Control in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 40, 669, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.011 · DOI
  69. Haddaway, 2016, The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management. Ambio 45, 613–620 (2016), Ambio, 45, 613, 10.1007/s13280-016-0773-x · DOI
  70. James, 2016, A Methodology for Systematic Mapping in Environmental Sciences, Environ. Evid., 5, 7, 10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Jaca, 2018, Towards a Consensus on the Circular Economy, J. Clean. Prod., 179, 605, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 · DOI
  72. Nascimento, 2019, Exploring Industry 4.0 Technologies to Enable Circular Economy Practices in a Manufacturing Context: A Business Model Proposal, J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., 30, 607, 10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071 · DOI
  73. Tijssen, 2002, Benchmarking International Scientific Excellence: Are Highly Cited Research Papers an Appropriate Frame of Reference?, Scientometrics, 54, 381, 10.1023/A:1016082432660 · DOI
  74. Shapira, 2011, “I’ve Got a Theory Paper—Do You?”: Conceptual, Empirical, and Theoretical Contributions to Knowledge in the Organizational Sciences, Organ. Sci., 22, 1312, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0636 · DOI
  75. Amato, 2020, Citric Acid Bioproduction: The Technological Innovation Change, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 40, 199, 10.1080/07388551.2019.1709799 · DOI
  76. Carillo, 2018, Eco-Friendly Use of Tomato Processing Residues for Lactic Acid Production in Campania, Chem. Eng. Trans., 64, 223
  77. Maschmeyer, 2020, Upgrading of Marine (Fish and Crustaceans) Biowaste for High Added-Value Molecules and Bio(Nano)-Materials, Chem. Soc. Rev., 49, 4527, 10.1039/C9CS00653B · DOI
  78. Dewick, 2019, Regulation and Regenerative Eco-Innovation: The Case of Extracted Materials in the UK, Ecol. Econ., 160, 38, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.034 · DOI
  79. Hopkinson, 2019, Recovery and Reuse of Structural Products from End-of-Life Buildings, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.—Eng. Sustain., 172, 119
  80. Rocchetti, 2018, Printed Circuit Board Recycling: A Patent Review, J. Clean. Prod., 178, 814, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.076 · DOI
  81. Sarc, 2019, Digitalisation and Intelligent Robotics in Value Chain of Circular Economy Oriented Waste Management—A Review, Waste Manag., 95, 476, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.035 · DOI
  82. Ubaldini, 2019, Treatment of Secondary Raw Materials by Innovative Processes, Chem. J. Mold., 14, 32, 10.19261/cjm.2019.585 · DOI
  83. Akyol, 2020, Validated Innovative Approaches for Energy-Efficient Resource Recovery and Re-Use from Municipal Wastewater: From Anaerobic Treatment Systems to a Biorefinery Concept, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 869, 10.1080/10643389.2019.1634456 · DOI
  84. Blankesteijn, M., and Bossink, B. (2020). Assessing the Legitimacy of Technological Innovation in the Public Sphere: Recovering Raw Materials from Waste Water. Sustainability, 12. · DOI
  85. Amenta, 2019, Transferring Circular Economy Solutions across Differentiated Territories: Understanding and Overcoming the Barriers for Knowledge Transfer, Urban Plan., 4, 52, 10.17645/up.v4i3.2162 · DOI
  86. Robles, 2020, New Frontiers from Removal to Recycling of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Wastewater in the Circular Economy, Bioresour. Technol., 300, 122673, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122673 · DOI
  87. Branca, T.A., Colla, V., Algermissen, D., Granbom, H., Martini, U., Morillon, A., Pietruck, R., and Rosendahl, S. (2020). Reuse and Recycling of By-Products in the Steel Sector: Recent Achievements Paving the Way to Circular Economy and Industrial Symbiosis in Europe. Metals, 10. · DOI
  88. Patricio, 2018, Enabling Industrial Symbiosis Collaborations between SMEs from a Regional Perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 202, 1120, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.230 · DOI
  89. Naims, 2020, Economic Aspirations Connected to Innovations in Carbon Capture and Utilization Value Chains, J. Ind. Ecol., 24, 1126, 10.1111/jiec.13003 · DOI
  90. Klein, 2018, Integrated Faades as a Product-Service System -Business Process Innovation to Accelerate Integral Product Implementation, J. Facade Des. Eng., 6, 41
  91. Guzzo, D., Trevisan, A.H., Echeveste, M., and Costa, J.M.H. (2019). Circular Innovation Framework: Verifying Conceptual to Practical Decisions in Sustainability-Oriented Product-Service System Cases. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
  92. Sposato, 2017, Sharing Economy and Circular Economy. How Technology and Collaborative Consumption Innovations Boost Closing the Loop Strategies, Environ. Eng. Manag. J., 16, 1797, 10.30638/eemj.2017.196 · DOI
  93. Geissdoerfer, 2020, Circular Business Models: A Review, J. Clean. Prod., 277, 123741, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Müller, M., Vorraber, W., and Slany, W. (2019). Open Principles in New Business Models for Information Systems. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 5. · DOI
  95. Nosratabadi, S., Mosavi, A., Shamshirband, S., Zavadskas, E.K., Rakotonirainy, A., and Chau, K.W. (2019). Sustainable Business Models: A Review. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
  96. Todeschini, 2017, Innovative and Sustainable Business Models in the Fashion Industry: Entrepreneurial Drivers, Opportunities, and Challenges, Bus. Horiz., 60, 759, 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.003 · DOI
  97. Reim, W., Parida, V., and Sjödin, D.R. (2019). Circular Business Models for the Bio-Economy: A Review and New Directions for Future Research. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
  98. Cristoni, 2018, Perceptions of Firms Participating in a Circular Economy, Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., 7, 105, 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p105 · DOI
  99. Borrello, 2020, Consumers Are Willing to Participate in Circular Business Models: A Practice Theory Perspective to Food Provisioning, J. Clean. Prod., 259, 121013, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121013 · DOI
  100. Hankammer, 2019, Towards Circular Business Models: Identifying Consumer Needs Based on the Jobs-to-Be-Done Theory, J. Clean. Prod., 231, 341, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.165 · DOI
  101. Jakhar, 2019, When Stakeholder Pressure Drives the Circular Economy: Measuring the Mediating Role of Innovation Capabilities, Manag. Decis., 57, 904, 10.1108/MD-09-2018-0990 · DOI
  102. Sattari, 2020, Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: An Investigation of Consumers’ Willingness to Adopt Product-Service Systems, J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci., 30, 274
  103. Zalewski, 2018, Circular Economy as a Management Model in the Paradigm of Sustainable Development, Management, 22, 217
  104. Horbach, 2020, Circular Economy Innovations, Growth and Employment at the Firm Level: Empirical Evidence from Germany, J. Ind. Ecol., 24, 615, 10.1111/jiec.12977 · DOI
  105. Smol, 2019, Towards Innovations Development in the European Raw Material Sector by Evolution of the Knowledge Triangle, Resour. Policy, 62, 453, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.04.006 · DOI
  106. Mead, 2020, Factors Influencing the Application of Nature as Inspiration for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in Multinational Corporations, Bus. Strategy Environ., 29, 3162, 10.1002/bse.2564 · DOI
  107. Colombo, 2019, The Discourse of Eco-Innovation in the European Union: An Analysis of the Eco-Innovation Action Plan and Horizon 2020, J. Clean. Prod., 214, 653, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.150 · DOI
  108. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., and Hultink, E.J. (2020). A Tool to Analyze, Ideate and Develop Circular Innovation Ecosystems. Sustainability, 12. · DOI
  109. Barrie, 2017, Leveraging Triple Helix and System Intermediaries to Enhance Effectiveness of Protected Spaces and Strategic Niche Management for Transitioning to Circular Economy, Int. J. Technol. Manag. Sustain. Dev., 16, 25, 10.1386/tmsd.16.1.25_1 · DOI
  110. Beliaeva, 2020, Bridging the Gap between Circular Economy and Climate Change Mitigation Policies through Eco-Innovations and Quintuple Helix Model, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 160, 120246, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120246 · DOI
  111. Birtchnell, 2013, 3D, SF and the Future, Futures, 50, 25, 10.1016/j.futures.2013.03.005 · DOI
  112. Laibach, 2020, Innovation Types in the Bioeconomy, J. Clean. Prod., 266, 121939, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121939 · DOI
  113. Hedeler, 2020, Strategic Decisions on Knowledge Development and Diffusion at Pilot and Demonstration Projects: An Empirical Mapping of Actors, Projects and Strategies in the Case of Circular Forest Bioeconomy, For. Policy Econ., 110, 102027, 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102027 · DOI
  114. Guillard, 2018, The Next Generation of Sustainable Food Packaging to Preserve Our Environment in a Circular Economy Context, Front. Nutr., 5, 121, 10.3389/fnut.2018.00121 · DOI · Paper page
  115. Cerimi, 2019, Fungi as Source for New Bio-Based Materials: A Patent Review, Fungal Biol. Biotechnol., 6, 17, 10.1186/s40694-019-0080-y · DOI
  116. Baldassarre, 2020, Implementing Sustainable Design Theory in Business Practice: A Call to Action, J. Clean. Prod., 273, 123113, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123113 · DOI
  117. Lesakova, 2019, Small and Medium Enterprises and Eco-Innovations: Empirical Study of Slovak SME´s, Mark. Manag. Innov., 3, 89
  118. Whicher, 2018, Design for Circular Economy: Developing an Action Plan for Scotland, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 3237, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.009 · DOI
  119. Cottafava, 2019, From Flow to Stock. New Circular Business Models for Integrated Systems: A Case Study on Reusable Plastic Cups, Procedia Environ. Sci. Eng. Manag., 6, 81
  120. Kuo, 2018, A Systematic Review of Technologies Involving Eco-Innovation for Enterprises Moving towards Sustainability, J. Clean. Prod., 192, 207, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212 · DOI
  121. Tebaldi, L., Bigliardi, B., and Bottani, E. (2018). Sustainable Supply Chain and Innovation: A Review of the Recent Literature. Sustainability, 10. · DOI
  122. 2020, Eco-Innovation and the Circular Economy in the Automotive Industry, Benchmarking Int. J., 28, 621, 10.1108/BIJ-06-2020-0317 · DOI
  123. Chauvy, 2020, CO2 Utilization Technologies in Europe: A Short Review, Energy Technol., 8, 2000627, 10.1002/ente.202000627 · DOI
  124. Vokoun, M., and Jílková, J. (2020). Eco-Innovation Activities in the Czech Economy 2008–2014: Impact of the Eco-Innovative Approach to the Profit Stream and Differences in Urban and Rural Enterprises. Economies, 8. · DOI
  125. Bui, T.D., Ali, M.H., Tsai, F.M., Iranmanesh, M., Tseng, M.-L., and Lim, M.K. (2020). Challenges and Trends in Sustainable Corporate Finance: A Bibliometric Systematic Review. J. Risk Financ. Manag., 13. · DOI
  126. Cioffi, R., Travaglioni, M., Piscitelli, G., Petrillo, A., and Parmentola, A. (2020). Smart Manufacturing Systems and Applied Industrial Technologies for a Sustainable Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Appl. Sci., 10. · DOI
  127. Hojnik, 2017, Eco-Innovation and Firm Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Slovenia, Foresight STI Gov., 11, 103, 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.3.103.111 · DOI
  128. Kiefer, 2019, Building a Taxonomy of Eco-Innovation Types in Firms. A Quantitative Perspective, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 145, 339, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.021 · DOI
  129. Leitão, J., Pereira, D., and Brito, S.D. (2020). Inbound and Outbound Practices of Open Innovation and Eco-Innovation: Contrasting Bioeconomy and Non-Bioeconomy Firms. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 6. · DOI
  130. Santos, 2021, Public policy for open innovation: Opening up to a new domain for research and practice, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 169, 1, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120821 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de Jesus, A., Lammi, M., Domenech, T., Vanhuyse, F., & Mendonça, S.
Affiliations
  • Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2825-149 Caparica, Portugal
  • Lord Ashcroft International Business School, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
  • Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, UK
  • Head of the Societal Transitions Unit and Senior Research Fellow, Stockholm Environment Institute, 115 23 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-02
Volume
13
Issue
19
Pages
10974
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su131910974
Cited by
55
References
7
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review