Cited by 87Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Practical classification guidelines for diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis

Open access
Hope, Suzy V, Wienand-Barnett, Sophie, Shepherd, Maggie, King, Sophie M, Fox, Charles, Khunti, Kamlesh, Oram, Richard A, Knight, Bea A +3 more·2016·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of the UK guidelines against 'gold standard' definitions of type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on measured C-peptide levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: In total, 601 adults with insulin-treated diabetes and diabetes duration ≥5 years were recruited in Devon, Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire. METHOD: Baseline information and home urine sample were collected. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) measures endogenous insulin production. Gold standard type 1 diabetes was defined as continuous insulin treatment within 3 years of diagnosis and absolute insulin deficiency (UCPCR<0.2 nmol/mmol ≥5 years post-diagnosis); all others classed as having type 2 diabetes. Diagnostic performance of the clinical criteria was assessed and other criteria explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: UK guidelines correctly classified 86% of participants. Most misclassifications occurred in patients classed as having type 1 diabetes who had significant endogenous insulin levels (57 out of 601; 9%); most in those diagnosed ≥35 years and treated with insulin from diagnosis, where 37 out of 66 (56%) were misclassified. Time to insulin and age at diagnosis performed best in predicting long-term endogenous insulin production (ROC AUC = 0.904 and 0.871); BMI was a less strong predictor of diabetes type (AUC = 0.824). CONCLUSION: Current UK guidelines provide a pragmatic clinical approach to classification reflecting long-term endogenous insulin production; caution is needed in older patients commencing insulin from diagnosis, where misclassification rates are increased.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp16x684961

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults with type 1 diabetes may retain sufficient β-cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission or decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA.

    “Adults may retain suf fi cient b -cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission or decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA (33 -35,60,61).”

    From 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [35]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The onset of type 1 diabetes may be more variable in adults; they may not present with the classic symptoms seen in children and may experience temporary remission from the need for anticipated full-dose insulin replacement.

    “The onset of type 1 diabetes may be more variable in adults; they may not present with the classic symptoms seen in children and may experience temporary remission from the need for anticipated full-dose insulin replacement (33 -35).”

    From 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Discussion (Implications for research and practice; page unavailable) describes adults with latent autoimmune diabetes who may not need insulin for at least six months, supporting a variable course of insulin need. It does not discuss whether adults lack the classic symptoms seen in children or experience a temporary remission after needing full-dose insulin replacement. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adults may retain sufficient b-cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission characterized by decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA.

    “Adults may retain sufficient b-cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission characterized by decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA (33-35, 59,60).”

    From 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [35]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rapid progression to insulin treatment (<3 years) is strongly suggestive of type 1 diabetes at any age.

    “Rapid progression to insulin treatment (<3 years) is strongly suggestive of type 1 diabetes at any age (6,8,15).”

    From The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) (2021) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results (Optimal clinical criteria; page not available) identify time from diagnosis to insulin as the strongest individual discriminator, supporting the link between rapid insulin treatment and type 1 diabetes. But the optimal cut-off was 12 months, not three years. The Discussion (Implications for research and practice; page not available) also reports substantial misclassification among people diagnosed at age 35 or older and treated with insulin from diagnosis, so the unqualified claim that this is strongly suggestive at any age is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Approximately 5-10% of White European people with new-onset type 1 diabetes have negative islet antibodies.

    “The absence of autoantibodies does not exclude type 1 diabetes, since approximately 5-10% of White European people with new-onset type 1 diabetes have negative islet antibodies (8,9,25), and further consideration of the diagnosis is necessary.”

    From The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) (2021) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results describe white European patients who had diabetes for at least five years, not people with new-onset diabetes. The Discussion (Implications for research and practice) proposes studies using islet antibodies at diagnosis, but gives no estimate of how often people with new-onset type 1 diabetes test negative. Searches for antibody-negative cases and the 5–10% figure found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management NICE guidelines [NG17] 2015 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17 (accessed 14 Mar 2016). 26334079

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hope, S. V., Wienand-Barnett, S., Shepherd, M., King, S. M., Fox, C., Khunti, K., Oram, R. A., Knight, B. A., Hattersley, A. T., Jones, A. G., & Shields, B. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Health Researches of Iran (IR)
  • Northampton General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2016-04-14
Volume
66
Issue
646
Pages
e315-e322
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2336113197
Cited by
87
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2015-23-001, ACF-2009-23-001, CL-2014-23-001, PB-PG-0711-25111, NF-SI-0611-10219, CS-2015-15-018)
  • NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, diabetes classification, insulin-treated diabetes, endogenous insulin production, diagnostic accuracy, age at diagnosis, body mass index, misclassification
MeSH terms
C-Peptide, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Insulin, Male, ROC Curve, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review