Cited by 56Skin Protection and AgingPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activitiesmelanin and skin pigmentation

Skin photoprotective and antiageing effects of a combination of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) polyphenols

Open access
Nobile, Vincenzo, Michelotti, Angela, Cestone, Enza, Caturla, Nuria, Castillo, Julián, Benavente-García, Obdulio, Pérez-Sánchez, Almudena, Micol, Vicente·2016·Food & Nutrition Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plant polyphenols have been found to be effective in preventing ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced skin alterations. A dietary approach based of these compounds could be a safe and effective method to provide a continuous adjunctive photoprotection measure. In a previous study, a combination of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) extracts has exhibited potential photoprotective effects both in skin cell model and in a human pilot trial. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of a combination of rosemary (R. officinalis) and grapefruit (C. paradisi) in decreasing the individual susceptibility to UVR exposure (redness and lipoperoxides) and in improving skin wrinkledness and elasticity. DESIGN: A randomised, parallel group study was carried out on 90 subjects. Furthermore, a pilot, randomised, crossover study was carried out on five subjects. Female subjects having skin phototype from I to III and showing mild to moderate chrono- or photoageing clinical signs were enrolled in both studies. Skin redness (a* value of CIELab colour space) after UVB exposure to 1 minimal erythemal dose (MED) was assessed in the pilot study, while MED, lipoperoxides (malondialdehyde) skin content, wrinkle depth (image analysis), and skin elasticity (suction and elongation method) were measured in the main study. RESULTS: Treated subjects showed a decrease of the UVB- and UVA-induced skin alterations (decreased skin redness and lipoperoxides) and an improvement of skin wrinkledness and elasticity. No differences were found between the 100 and 250 mg extracts doses, indicating a plateau effect starting from 100 mg extracts dose. Some of the positive effects were noted as short as 2 weeks of product consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term oral intake of Nutroxsun™ can be considered to be a complementary nutrition strategy to avoid the negative effects of sun exposure. The putative mechanism for these effects is most likely to take place through the inhibition of UVR-induced reactive oxygen species and the concomitant inflammatory markers (lipoperoxides and cytokines) together with their direct action on intracellular signalling pathways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/fnr.v60.31871

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A randomized parallel-group study showed that oral administration of dietary polyphenols reduced UV-induced facial skin redness and lipoperoxides and improved facial skin wrinkles and elasticity.

    “This randomized, parallel-group study showed that oral administration of dietary polyphenols reduced the UV-induced facial skin redness and lipoperoxides and improved facial skin wrinkles and elasticity [115].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nobile, V., Michelotti, A., Cestone, E., Caturla, N., Castillo, J., Benavente-García, O., Pérez-Sánchez, A., & Micol, V.
Affiliations
  • Complife Group Pavia, Italy
  • Monteloeder, S.L. (Spain) (ES)
  • Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES)
  • Universidad de Murcia (ES)
  • Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
Corresponding author
Nobile, Vincenzo
Venue
Food & Nutrition Research
Published
2016-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
31871
ISSN
  • 1654-661X (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-6628
OpenAlex
W2467298575
Cited by
56
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Food & Nutrition Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (AGL2015- 67995-C3-1-R, AGL2015-67995-C3, 67995-C3-1-R)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
photoprotection, skin aging, ultraviolet radiation, malondialdehyde, lipid hydroperoxides, skin elasticity, dietary supplementation, reactive oxygen species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review