Cited by 38Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesOral microbiology and periodontitis researchGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Salivary Fusobacterium nucleatum serves as a potential diagnostic biomarker for gastric cancer

Open access
Chen, Wen-Dan, Zhang, Xin, Zhang, Meng-Jiao, Zhang, Ya-Ping, Shang, Zi-Qi, Xin, Yi-Wei, Zhang, Yi·2022·World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: (Fn) primarily colonized in the oral cavity, has been reported to be involved in the development of gastrointestinal tumor. Until now, little is known about the relationship between salivary Fn and GC. AIM: To determine whether salivary Fn could be a biomarker to diagnose GC and explore the influence of Fn on GC cells. METHODS: The abundance of Fn in saliva was quantified by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction in 120 GC patients, 31 atrophic gastritis (AG) patients, 35 non-AG (NAG) patients, 26 gastric polyp (GP) patients, and 20 normal controls (NC) from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2019 to December 2020. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of Fn as well as traditional serum tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and CA72-4. Transwell assay and wound-healing assay were conducted to assess the influence of Fn infection on GC cells. The expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers was detected using western blot assay. RESULTS: < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed a favorable capability of Fn (73.33% sensitivity; 82.14% specificity; area under the curve: 0.813) in GC diagnosis, which was superior to that of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, ferritin, and sialic acid. The Fn level in saliva of GC patients was increased as the TNM stage increased. GC patients with lymph node metastasis had higher Fn levels than those without metastasis. Both transwell and wound-healing assays indicated that Fn infection promoted the migration and invasion of GC cells. Western blot analysis showed that Fn infection decreased the expression of E-cadherin and increased the expressions of N-cadherin, vimentin, and snail. CONCLUSION: Fn abundance in saliva could be used as a promising biomarker to diagnose GC, and Fn infection could promote GC metastasis by accelerating the EMT process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4120

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on reported target strain abundance in saliva (<10^7 cells/mL for each target species) and average saliva volume, the total amount of postbiotic cells required for efficient coaggregation was estimated to be 10^9 bacterial cells/g of product.

    “Based on the reported target strain abundance in saliva (<107 cells/mL saliva for each of the target species) [43–46] and the average saliva volume in the mouth under stimulated conditions [47,48], we estimated that the total amount of postbiotic cells required for efficient coaggregation would be 109 bacterial cells/g of product.”

    From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, W.-D., Zhang, X., Zhang, M.-J., Zhang, Y.-P., Shang, Z.-Q., Xin, Y.-W., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Venue
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2022-08-14
Volume
28
Issue
30
Pages
4120-4132
ISSN
1007-9327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292451879
Cited by
38
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • World Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
Fusobacterium nucleatum, gastric cancer, salivary biomarkers, diagnostic biomarkers, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, tumor cell migration and invasion, lymph node metastasis, atrophic gastritis, serum tumor markers, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, snails
MeSH terms
Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Ferritins, Humans, Prognosis, Stomach Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Vimentin, Cadherins, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Adenomatous Polyps, CA-19-9 Antigen, N-Acetylneuraminic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review