Cited by 139Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Working memory and phonological processing as predictors of children’s mathematical problem solving at different ages

Swanson, H. Lee·2004·Memory & Cognition

Abstract

The study explored the contribution of working memory (WM) to mathematical problem solving in younger (8-year-old) and older (11-year-old) children. The results showed that (1) significant age-related differences in WM performance were maintained when measures of phonological processing (i.e., digit naming speed, short-term memory, phonological deletion) were partialed from the analysis; (2) WM predicted solution accuracy of word problems independently of measures of problem representation, knowledge of operations and algorithms, phonological processing, fluid intelligence, reading, and math skill; and (3) a second-order WM factor was correlated with problem solving, suggesting that a general or executive system underlies age-related performance. The results were interpreted as support for the notion that the executive system was an important predictor of age-related changes in problem solving beyond the contribution of math and reading skills, and this system operates independently of the phonological system and domain-specific knowledge in predicting solution accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03195856

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EF have been shown to explain at least as much variance in academic achievement as intelligence.

    “In fact, EF have been shown to explain at least as much variance in academic achievement as intelligence (e.g., Swanson, 2004; Altemeier et al., 2008; Andersson, 2008; Alloway and Alloway, 2010; Lu et al., 2011)”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Swanson, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, H. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, H. Lee
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
2004-06
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
648-661
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2132792816
Cited by
139
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory, phonological processing, mathematical problem solving, children, age differences, word problems, solution accuracy, executive function, short-term memory, phonological deletion, fluid intelligence, reading skills, mathematical skills
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Memory, Phonetics, Problem Solving, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review