Cited by 272Behavioral and Psychological StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Operant variability: Evidence, functions, and theory

Open access
Neuringer, Allen·2002·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Although responses are sometimes easy to predict, at other times responding seems highly variable, unpredictable, or even random. The inability to predict is generally attributed to ignorance of controlling variables, but this article is a review of research showing that the highest levels of behavioral variability may result from identifiable reinforcers contingent on such variability. That is, variability is an operant. Discriminative stimuli and reinforcers control it, resulting in low or high variability, depending on the contingencies. Schedule-of-reinforcement effects are orderly, and choosing to vary or repeat is lawfully governed by relative reinforcement frequencies. The operant nature of variability has important implications. For example, learning, exploring, creating, and problem solving may partly depend on it. Abnormal levels of variability, including those found in psychopathologies such as autism, depression, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, may be modified through reinforcement. Operant variability may also help to explain some of the unique attributes of voluntary action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196324

Cites

208 of 208 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One can only remember so much information, but what one does with that memory presumably depends on reinforcement contingencies and other factors.

    “This captures the idea that one can only remember so much information, but it is distinct from what one does with that memory, which presumably depends on reinforcement contingencies and other factors (Glimcher, 2005; Neuringer, 2002).”

    From DYNAMIC RESPONSE-BY-RESPONSE MODELS OF MATCHING BEHAVIOR IN RHESUS MONKEYS (2005) · cites this paper as Neuringer, 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Arnesen, E. M. (2000). Reinforcement of object manipulation in- creases discovery. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Reed College.
  2. Boden, M. A. (1994). What is creativity? In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimen- sions of creativity (pp. 75-117). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Boren, J. J., Moerschbaecher, J. M., & Whyte, A. A. (1978). Vari- ability of response location on fixed-ratio and fixed-interval sched- ules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Be- havior, 30, 65-67.
  4. Burns, J. (1997). Training changing triangles: A new paradigm for ex- amining behavioral variability in multiple dimensions. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Reed College.
  5. Dember, W. N., & Richman, C. L. (1989). Spontaneousalternation be- havior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  6. Driver, P. M., & Humphries, D. A. (1988). Protean behavior: The bi- ology of unpredictability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Eckerman, D. A., & Lanson, R. N. (1969). Variability of response lo- cation for pigeons responding under continuous reinforcement, in- termittent reinforcement and extinction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 73-80.
  8. Killeen, P. (1981). Incentive theory. In D. J. Bernstein (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1981: Response structure and organiza- tion (pp. 169-216). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  9. Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  10. Lee, R., McComas, J. J., & Jawor, J. (in press). The effects of differ- ential reinforcement on varied verbal responding by individuals with autism to social questions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis.
  11. Mechner, F. (1958). Sequential dependencies of the lengths of con- secutive response runs. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Be- havior, 1, 229-233.
  12. Nevin, J. A. (1967). Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultane- ous discrimination performance. Journal of the Experimental Analy- sis of Behavior, 10, 251-260.
  13. Peterson, I. (1997). The jungle of randomness: A mathematical safari. New York: Wiley.
  14. Roots, C. (2000). A spoonful of fish food helps the repetition go down: Reinforcing variability in Betta splendens. Unpublished undergradu- ate thesis, Reed College.
  15. Schwartz, B. (1982). Failure to produce variability with reinforce- ment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 171-181.
  16. Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  17. Wells, M. (1999). Teaching an old rat new tricks: The effects of age on behavioral variability. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Reed Col- lege.
  18. Wilson, N. (1986). Standards for deviation: Tools for reinforcing vari- ability. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Reed College.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neuringer, A.
Affiliations
Reed College (US)
Corresponding author
Neuringer, Allen
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2002-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
672-705
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2145998391
Cited by
272
References
208
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Reed College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
behavioral variability, discriminative stimulus, reinforcement contingencies, reinforcement schedules, reinforcement frequency, operant behavior, learning, exploration, problem solving, autism spectrum disorder, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, voluntary action
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Association Learning, Awareness, Behavior Therapy, Conditioning, Operant, Humans, Motivation, Reinforcement Schedule, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review