Cited by 72Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsAction Observation and Synchronization

Differential neuronal responses to the self and others in the extrastriate body area and the fusiform body area

Open access
Vocks, Silja, Busch, Martin, Grönemeyer, Dietrich, Schulte, Dietmar, Herpertz, Stephan, Suchan, Boris·2010·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The extrastriate body area (EBA) and the fusiform body area (FBA) are selectively activated by viewing human bodies. However, the role of these functionally defined brain areas in self-other discrimination is still unresolved. Thirty-one females were presented with 16 pictures of their own body and another body in a bikini and with scrambled images while fMRI was performed. Moreover, standardized stimulus material was used in order to localize the EBA and FBA. Region-of-interest analysis showed an enhanced BOLD response to the self-images relative to the non-self-images in the right EBA and FBA. The right EBA and FBA are activated differently by viewing oneself and others and might thus play a role in visual self-other discrimination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.10.3.422

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vocks, S., Busch, M., Grönemeyer, D., Schulte, D., Herpertz, S., & Suchan, B.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Corresponding author
Vocks, Silja
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2010-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
422-429
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2041670770
Cited by
72
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
self-other distinction, extrastriate body area, fusiform body area, body image, body part recognition, body perception, right hemisphere, BOLD signal
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Image, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Occipital Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reference Values, Self Concept, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review