Cited by 1,464Action Observation and SynchronizationEmpathy and Medical EducationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal

Lamm, Claus, Batson, C. Daniel, Decety, Jean·2007·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Whether observation of distress in others leads to empathic concern and altruistic motivation, or to personal distress and egoistic motivation, seems to depend upon the capacity for self-other differentiation and cognitive appraisal. In this experiment, behavioral measures and event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging were used to investigate the effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal while participants observed the facial expression of pain resulting from medical treatment. Video clips showing the faces of patients were presented either with the instruction to imagine the feelings of the patient (“imagine other”) or to imagine oneself to be in the patient's situation (“imagine self”). Cognitive appraisal was manipulated by providing information that the medical treatment had or had not been successful. Behavioral measures demonstrated that perspective-taking and treatment effectiveness instructions affected participants' affective responses to the observed pain. Hemodynamic changes were detected in the insular cortices, anterior medial cingulate cortex (aMCC), amygdala, and in visual areas including the fusiform gyrus. Graded responses related to the perspective-taking instructions were observed in middle insula, aMCC, medial and lateral premotor areas, and selectively in left and right parietal cortices. Treatment effectiveness resulted in signal changes in the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex, in the ventromedial orbito-frontal cortex, in the right lateral middle frontal gyrus, and in the cerebellum. These findings support the view that humans' responses to the pain of others can be modulated by cognitive and motivational processes, which influence whether observing a conspecific in need of help will result in empathic concern, an important instigator for helping behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • 1INSERM Unit 280, France
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
42-58
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2157258415
Cited by
1,464
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 92
FWCI
92.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
empathy, perspective taking, cognitive appraisal, empathic concern, altruism, personal distress, self-other distinction, facial expressions of pain, treatment effectiveness, insula, amygdala, fusiform gyrus, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, cerebellum, helping behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Emotions, Empathy, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values, Social Perception, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review