Cited by 183Face Recognition and PerceptionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Anxiety modulates the degree of attentive resources required to process emotional faces

Open access
FOX, E., RUSSO, R., GEORGIOU, G. A.·2005·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The present study contributes to the ongoing debate over the extent to which attentive resources are required for emotion perception. Although fearful facial expressions are strong competitors for attention, we predict that the magnitude of this effect may be modulated by anxiety. To test this hypothesis, healthy volunteers who varied in their self-reported levels of trait and state anxiety underwent an attentional blink task. Both fearful and happy facial expressions were subject to a strong attentional blink effect for low-anxious individuals. For those reporting high anxiety, a blink occurred for both fearful and happy facial expressions, but the magnitude of the attentional blink was significantly reduced for the fearful expressions. This supports the proposals that emotion perception is not fully automatic and that anxiety is related to a reduced ability to inhibit the processing of threat-related stimuli. Thus, individual differences in self-reported anxiety are an important determinant of the attentional control of emotional processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.5.4.396

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FOX, E., RUSSO, R., & GEORGIOU, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Essex (GB)
Corresponding author
FOX, E.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
396-404
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2024883397
Cited by
181
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Essex
  • Wellcome Trust (064290, 064290/Z/ 01/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anxiety, emotion perception, emotional face processing, attentional blink, fearful faces, happy facial expressions, trait anxiety, state anxiety, attentional control, threat processing, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Field Dependence-Independence, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Defense, Psychomotor Performance, Psychophysics, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review