Cited by 64Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Information content and reward processing in the human striatum during performance of a declarative memory task

Open access
Tricomi, Elizabeth, Fiez, Julie A.·2012·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Negative feedback can signal poor performance, but it also provides information that can help learners reach the goal of task mastery. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the amount of information provided by negative feedback during a paired-associate learning task influences feedback-related processing in the caudate nucleus. To do this, we manipulated the number of response options: With two options, positive and negative feedback provide equal amounts of information, whereas with four options, positive feedback provides more information than does negative feedback. We found that positive and negative feedback activated the caudate similarly when there were two response options. With four options, the caudate's response to negative feedback was reduced. A secondary goal was to investigate the link between brain-based measures of feedback-related processing and behavioral indices of learning. Analysis of the posttest measures showed that trials with positive feedback were associated with higher posttest confidence ratings. Additionally, when positive feedback was delivered, caudate activity was greater for trials with high than with low posttest confidence. This experiment demonstrated the context sensitivity of feedback processing and provided evidence that feedback processing in the striatum can contribute to the strengthening of the representations available within declarative memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13415-011-0077-3

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learning signals in the striatum are present even when feedback is informative but not explicitly rewarding.

    “Interestingly, learning signals in the striatum are present even when feedback is informative but not explicitly rewarding (e.g. feedback that a choice was correct or incorrect) 26, 27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lancaster, J. L., Woldorff, M. G., Parsons, L. M., Liotti, M., Freitas, C. S., Rainey, L.,... Fox, P. T. (2000). Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 120–131. PMC6871915 10912591

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tricomi, E., & Fiez, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Tricomi, Elizabeth
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2011-12-23
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
361-372
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2092206500
Cited by
64
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA14103, R01DA014103)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
negative feedback, reward processing, caudate nucleus, striatum, paired-associate learning, declarative memory, information content, response options, confidence ratings, context sensitivity
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Corpus Striatum, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Reward, Vocabulary, Prefrontal Cortex, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review