Cited by 275Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Lateral habenula neurons signal errors in the prediction of reward information

Open access
Bromberg-Martin, Ethan S, Hikosaka, Okihide·2011·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Humans and animals have the ability to predict future events, which they cultivate by continuously searching their environment for sources of predictive information. However, little is known about the neural systems that motivate this behavior. We hypothesized that information-seeking is assigned value by the same circuits that support reward-seeking, such that neural signals encoding reward prediction errors (RPEs) include analogous information prediction errors (IPEs). To test this, we recorded from neurons in the lateral habenula, a nucleus that encodes RPEs, while monkeys chose between cues that provided different chances to view information about upcoming rewards. We found that a subpopulation of lateral habenula neurons transmitted signals resembling IPEs, responding when reward information was unexpectedly cued, delivered or denied. These signals evaluated information sources reliably, even when the monkey's decisions did not. These neurons could provide a common instructive signal for reward-seeking and information-seeking behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2902

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dopamine responses in elaborate tasks constitute standard reward prediction-error signals.

    “However, on closer inspection, dopamine responses in such elaborate tasks constitute standard reward prediction-error signals2,33,59,66,69,75,151–153.”
  • These slow changes fail to occur with more-controlled arm, mouth and eye movements in a considerable range of studies.

    “these changes fail to occur with more-controlled arm, mouth and eye movements in a considerable range of studies2,5,9,13,151,152,154”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bromberg-Martin, E. S., & Hikosaka, O.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Bromberg-Martin, Ethan S
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2011-08-21
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
1209-1216
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2056746865
Cited by
275
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2011-11-23)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 EY999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
lateral habenula, reward prediction error, information seeking, reward seeking, value of information, neural coding, decision-making, predictive information
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Choice Behavior, Cues, Macaca mulatta, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Reaction Time, Reward, ROC Curve, Time Factors, Signal Detection, Psychological, Habenula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review