The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural effects of short-term training on working memory
Open accessAbstract
Working memory training has been the focus of intense research interest. Despite accumulating behavioral work, knowledge about the neural mechanisms underlying training effects is scarce. Here, we show that 7 days of training on an n-back task led to substantial performance improvements in the trained task; furthermore, the experimental group showed cross-modal transfer, as compared with an active control group. In addition, there were two neural effects that emerged as a function of training: first, increased perfusion during task performance in selected regions, reflecting a neural response to cope with high task demand; second, increased blood flow at rest in regions where training effects were apparent. We also found that perfusion at rest was correlated with task proficiency, probably reflecting an improved neural readiness to perform. Our findings are discussed within the context of the available neuroimaging literature on n-back training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On theoretical grounds, the observed improvements are plausible, since Gf and n-back performance draw upon overlapping cognitive and neural processes, including shared demands on WM and interference resolution (Burgess et al., 2011;Buschkuehl, Hernandez-Garcia, Jaeggi, Bernard, & Jonides, 2014;von Bastian & Oberauer, 2013).”
From Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Buschkuehl, Hernandez-Garcia, Jaeggi, Bernard, & Jonides, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While there is little doubt that N-back training leads to improved performance on untrained N-back tasks13,25–27”
From Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Extending this to the neural level, it is plausible that transfer occurs if the training and transfer tasks engage overlapping processes and neural circuits26,51.”
From Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl004 · Cited by 5,128
A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI
Behzadi, Y., Restom, K., Liau, J., & Liu, T. T. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 · Cited by 4,502
Editorial Office (1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,941
N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies.
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20131 · Cited by 3,560
Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium
Brown, A. S., & Solso, R. L. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421430 · Cited by 2,398
Attention And Cognitive Control 1
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032722450-4 · Cited by 2,264
Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801268105 · Cited by 2,187
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis
Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x · Cited by 727
Self-citationWorking memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies
Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0 · Cited by 371
Brain Modularity: A Biomarker of Intervention-related Plasticity
Gallen, C. L., & D’Esposito, M. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.014 · Cited by 168
Augmentation of working memory training by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Ruf, S. P., Fallgatter, A. J., & Plewnia, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01055-1 · Cited by 167
Enhancing Working Memory Training with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Au, J., Katz, B., Buschkuehl, M., Bunarjo, K., Senger, T., Zabel, C., Jaeggi, S. M., & Jonides, J. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00979 · Cited by 156
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buschkuehl, M., Hernandez-Garcia, L., Jaeggi, S. M., Bernard, J. A., & Jonides, J.
- Affiliations
- MIND Research Institute (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Buschkuehl, Martin
- Venue
- Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014-02-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-160
- ISSN
- 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-135X
- PMC
- PMC4058299
- OpenAlex
- W2063604392
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 19.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG000114)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory training, n-back task, cross-modal transfer, blood flow, task proficiency
- MeSH terms
- Auditory Perception, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Practice, Psychological, Rest, Task Performance and Analysis, Transfer, Psychology, Visual Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
