Cited by 37Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Transfer of training from one working memory task to another: behavioural and neural evidence

Open access
Beatty, Erin L., Jobidon, Marie-Eve, Bouak, Fethi, Nakashima, Ann, Smith, Ingrid, Lam, Quan, Blackler, Kristen, Cheung, Bob +1 more·2015·Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Abstract

N-back working memory (WM) tasks necessitate the maintenance and updating of dynamic rehearsal sets during performance. The delayed matching-to-sample (dMTS) task is another WM task, which in turn involves the encoding, maintenance, and retrieval of stimulus representations in sequential order. Because both n-back and dMTS engage WM function, we hypothesized that compared to a control task not taxing WM, training on the n-back task would be associated with better performance on dMTS by virtue of training a shared mental capacity. We tested this hypothesis by randomly assigning subjects (N = 43) to train on either the n-back (including 2-back and 3-back levels) or an active control task. Following training, dMTS was administered in the fMRI scanner. The n-back group performed marginally better than the active control group on dMTS. In addition, although the n-back group improved more on the less difficult 2-back level than the more difficult 3-back level across training sessions, it was improvement on the 3-back level that accounted for 21% of the variance in dMTS performance. For the control group, improvement in training across sessions was unrelated to dMTS performance. At the neural level, greater activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus, right posterior parietal cortex, and the cerebellum distinguished the n-back group from the control group in the maintenance phase of dMTS. Degree of improvement on the 3-back level across training sessions was correlated with activation in right lateral prefrontal and motor cortices in the maintenance phase of dMTS. Our results suggest that although n-back training is more likely to improve performance in easier blocks, it is improvement in more difficult blocks that is predictive of performance on a target task drawing on WM. In addition, the extent to which training on a task can transfer to another task is likely due to the engagement of shared cognitive capacities and underlying neural substrates-in this case WM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00086

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. D‘Esposito M. (2008). “ Working memory,” in Handbook of Clinical Neurology: Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, eds Goldenberg G. Miller B. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 237– 247.
  2. Nakashima A. Vartanian O. Bouak F. Hofer K. Cheung B. (2011). “ A test battery for the assessment of psychological and physiological performance following primary blast wave exposure,” in Proceedings of the Military and Veterans Health Research Forum eds Aiken A. B. Bélanger S. A. H. (Kingston, ON: Canadian Defence Academy Press), 134– 153.
  3. Raven J. Raven J. C. Court J. H. (1998). Raven Manual: Section 4. Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beatty, E. L., Jobidon, M.-E., Bouak, F., Nakashima, A., Smith, I., Lam, Q., Blackler, K., Cheung, B., & Vartanian, O.
Affiliations
Defence Research and Development Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Beatty, Erin L.
Venue
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Published
2015-06-02
Volume
9
Pages
86-86
ISSN
1662-5137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1586139427
Cited by
37
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Association for Psychological Science
  • Ministère de la Défense Nationale
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
transfer of training, working memory, n-back task, delayed matching-to-sample, rehearsal, inferior frontal gyrus, posterior parietal cortex, cerebellum, prefrontal cortex, motor cortex, training difficulty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review