Cited by 23Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

The Effects of Working Memory Training on Brain Activity

Open access
Nęcka, Edward, Gruszka, Aleksandra, Hampshire, Adam, Sarzyńska-Wawer, Justyna, Anicai, Andreea-Elena, Orzechowski, Jarosław, Nowak, Michał, Wójcik, Natalia +2 more·2021·Brain Sciences

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate if two weeks of working memory (WM) training on a progressive N-back task can generate changes in the activity of the underlying WM neural network. Forty-six healthy volunteers (23 training and 23 controls) were asked to perform the N-back task during three fMRI scanning sessions: (1) before training, (2) after the half of training sessions, and (3) at the end. Between the scanning sessions, the experimental group underwent a 10-session training of working memory with the use of an adaptive version of the N-back task, while the control group did not train anything. The N-back task in the scanning sessions was relatively easy (n = 2) in order to ensure high accuracy and a lack of between-group differences at the behavioral level. Such training-induced differences in neural efficiency were expected. Behavioral analyses revealed improved performance of both groups on the N-back task. However, these improvements resulted from the test-retest effect, not the training outside scanner. Performance on the non-trained stop-signal task did not demonstrate any transfer effect. Imaging analysis showed changes in activation in several significant clusters, with overlapping regions of interest in the frontal and parietal lobes. However, patterns of between-session changes of activation did not show any effect of training. The only finding that can be linked with training consists in strengthening the correlation between task performance accuracy and activation of the parietal regions of the neural network subserving working memory (left superior parietal lobule and right supramarginal gyrus posterior). These results suggest that the effects of WM training consist in learning that, in order to ensure high accuracy in the criterion task, activation of the parietal regions implicated in working memory updating must rise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci11020155

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decreased activation in L-AG and R-IPL may reflect changes in task representations and reduced reliance on parietal engagement.

    “Decreased activation in the L–AG and R–IPL—parietal regions implicated in information maintenance and manipulation—may reflect changes in task representations and reduced reliance on parietal engagement56,67, consistent with their correlated changes and prior evidence for coupling between default-mode and frontoparietal control systems.”

    From Meta-analysis of computerised working memory training: behavioural gains, training parameters, transfer mechanisms, and neural correlates (2026) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports decreased parietal activation in participants with lower task accuracy, but identifies the regions as the left superior parietal lobule and right posterior supramarginal gyrus, not the L–AG and R–IPL. It does not interpret the decrease as a change in task representations or reduced reliance on parietal engagement; instead, it reports greater activation with better accuracy and says it found no support for a general neural-efficiency explanation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Baddeley A. Hitch G.J. Working memory Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation Bower G. Academic Press New York, NY, USA 1974 Volume 8 47 90

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nęcka, E., Gruszka, A., Hampshire, A., Sarzyńska-Wawer, J., Anicai, A.-E., Orzechowski, J., Nowak, M., Wójcik, N., Sandrone, S., & Soreq, E.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 31-007 Krakow, Poland
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-090 Warsaw, Poland
  • Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
155
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121871355
Cited by
23
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Center), Poland (DEC-2013/08/A/HS6/00045)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory training, n-back task, neural efficiency, brain activity changes, parietal cortex, superior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus, frontal lobe, stop-signal task, transfer effects, test-retest effects, working memory updating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review