Cited by 261Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsGeography Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Active and passive contributions to spatial learning

Open access
Chrastil, Elizabeth R., Warren, William H.·2012·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

It seems intuitively obvious that active exploration of a new environment will lead to better spatial learning than will passive exposure. However, the literature on this issue is decidedly mixed-in part, because the concept itself is not well defined. We identify five potential components of active spatial learning and review the evidence regarding their role in the acquisition of landmark, route, and survey knowledge. We find that (1) idiothetic information in walking contributes to metric survey knowledge, (2) there is little evidence as yet that decision making during exploration contributes to route or survey knowledge, (3) attention to place-action associations and relevant spatial relations contributes to route and survey knowledge, although landmarks and boundaries appear to be learned without effort, (4) route and survey information are differentially encoded in subunits of working memory, and (5) there is preliminary evidence that mental manipulation of such properties facilitates spatial learning. Idiothetic information appears to be necessary to reveal the influence of attention and, possibly, decision making in survey learning, which may explain the mixed results in desktop virtual reality. Thus, there is indeed an active advantage in spatial learning, which manifests itself in the task-dependent acquisition of route and survey knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-011-0182-x

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Carassa, A., Geminiani, G., Morganti, F., & Varotto, D. (2002). Active and passive spatial learning in a complex virtual environment: The effect of efficient exploration. Cognitive Processing, 3–4, 65–81.
  2. Chrastil, E. R. (2011). Neural correlates of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in human navigation. Manuscript under review
  3. Kearns, M. J. (2003). The roles of vision and body senses in a homing task: The visual environment matters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Providence: Brown University.
  4. Wilson, P., & Péruch, P. (2002). The influence of interactivity and attention on spatial learning in a desk-top virtual environment. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 21, 601–633.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chrastil, E. R., & Warren, W. H.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Chrastil, Elizabeth R.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2011-11-15
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2060498941
Cited by
261
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
spatial learning, active exploration, passive exposure, landmark learning, route learning, survey knowledge, working memory, attention, decision-making, virtual reality, spatial relations
MeSH terms
Attention, Decision Making, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Learning, Spatial Behavior, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review