Cited by 23Language and cultural evolutionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and Disorders

The language-ready head: Evolutionary considerations

Open access
Boeckx, Cedric·2017·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

This article offers a succinct overview of the hypothesis that the evolution of cognition could benefit from a close examination of brain changes reflected in the shape of the neurocranium. I provide both neurological and genetic evidence in support of this hypothesis, and conclude that the study of language evolution need not be regarded as a mystery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-016-1087-5

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We suggest that modifications of a complex network in cognition or learning took place in modern human evolution, possibly related to other brain-related, vocal tract or neural changes.

    “We suggest that modifications of a complex network in cognition or learning took place in modern human evolution128, possibly related to other brain-related9,16,129,130, vocal tract131 or neural changes132.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lewontin, R. 1998. Evolution of cognition. Questions we will never answer. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 4. Methods, models, and conceptual issues. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Theofanopoulou, C., & Boeckx, C. (in press). (Neural) syntax. In R. Martin & A. Gallego (Eds.), Language, syntax, and the natural sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Uttal WR The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain 2001 Cambridge, MA MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boeckx, C.
Affiliations
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Boeckx, Cedric
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
194-199
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2474721871
Cited by
23
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Marie Curie Actions, European Union (PIRG-GA-2009-256413)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2014-SGR-200)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI2014-61888-EXP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
language evolution, skull morphology, cognitive evolution, brain evolution
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Biological Evolution, Humans, Language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review