Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing

Open access
Makowski, Dominique, Pham, Tam, Lau, Zen J., Brammer, Jan C., Lespinasse, François, Pham, Hung, Schölzel, Christopher, Chen, S. H. Annabel·2021·Behavior Research Methods

Abstract

NeuroKit2 is an open-source, community-driven, and user-centered Python package for neurophysiological signal processing. It provides a comprehensive suite of processing routines for a variety of bodily signals (e.g., ECG, PPG, EDA, EMG, RSP). These processing routines include high-level functions that enable data processing in a few lines of code using validated pipelines, which we illustrate in two examples covering the most typical scenarios, such as an event-related paradigm and an interval-related analysis. The package also includes tools for specific processing steps such as rate extraction and filtering methods, offering a trade-off between high-level convenience and fine-tuned control. Its goal is to improve transparency and reproducibility in neurophysiological research, as well as foster exploration and innovation. Its design philosophy is centred on user-experience and accessibility to both novice and advanced users.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bach, D. R. (2014). A head-to-head comparison of scralyze and ledalab, two model-based methods for skin conductance analysis. Biological Psychology, 103, 63–68. · DOI
  2. Bartels, R., & Pecanha, T. (2020). HRV: A pythonic package for heart rate variability analysis. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(51), 1867. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01867 · DOI
  3. Benedek, M., & Kaernbach, C. (2010). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190(1), 80–91. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Clifton, D. A., Gibbons, J., Davies, J., & Tarassenko, L. (2012). Machine learning and software engineering in health informatics. 2012 first international workshop on realizing ai synergies in software engineering (raise) (pp 37–41). IEEE. · DOI
  5. Gabrieli, G., Azhari, A., & Esposito, G. (2019). PySiology: A python package for physiological feature extraction. In Neural approaches to dynamics of signal exchanges (pp. 395–402). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4∖_35 · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4∖_35
  6. Gomes, P., Margaritoff, P., & Silva, H (2019). pyHRV: Development and evaluation of an open-source python toolbox for heart rate variability (hrv). Proc. Int’l conf On electrical, electronic and computing engineering (icetran), 822–828.
  7. Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D. A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., & et al. (2013). MEG and eeg data analysis with mne-python. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 267. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Greco, A., Valenza, G., Lanata, A., Scilingo, E. P., & Citi, L. (2015). CvxEDA: A convex optimization approach to electrodermal activity processing. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(4), 797–804.
  9. Jupyter, B., Forde, F., Granger, H. W, Akici, F., Lippa, D., Niederhut, D., & Pacer, M. (2018). Binder 2.0 - Reproducible, interactive, sharable environments for science at scale. In Proceedings of the 17th Python in Science Conference. https://doi.org/%2010.25080/Majora-4af1f417-011%20 (pp. 113–120). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Khodadad, D., Nordebo, S., Mueller, B., Waldmann, A., Yerworth, R., Becher, T., & et al. (2018). Optimized breath detection algorithm in electrical impedance tomography. Physiological Measurement, 39(9), 094001. · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/aad7e6
  11. Kiverstein, J., & Miller, M. (2015). The embodied brain: Towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 237. · DOI
  12. Maizey, L., & Tzavella, L. (2019). Barriers and solutions for early career researchers in tackling the reproducibility crisis in cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 113, 357–359. · DOI
  13. Makowski, D. (2020). Neurokit: A python toolbox for statistics and neurophysiological signal processing (eeg, eda, ecg, emg...). Retrieved from https://github.com/neuropsychology/NeuroKit.py · DOI
  14. Marchewka, A., Żurawski, J.K., & Grabowska, A. (2014). The nencki affective picture system (naps): Introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 596–610. · DOI · Paper page
  15. McKinney, W., et al. (2010). Data structures for statistical computing in python. Proceedings of the 9th python in science conference (vol. 445, pp. 51–56). Austin. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Miłkowski, M., Hensel, W. M., & Hohol, M. (2018). Replicability or reproducibility? on the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 45(3), 163–172. · DOI
  17. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
  18. Quintana, D., Alvares, G. A., & Heathers, J. (2016). Guidelines for reporting articles on psychiatry and heart rate variability (graph): Recommendations to advance research communication. Translational Psychiatry, 6(5), e803–e803. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Topalidou, M., Leblois, A., Boraud, T., & Rougier, N. (2015). P A long journey into reproducible computational neuroscience. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 9, 30. · DOI
  20. Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009) Python 3 reference manual. CreateSpace: Scotts Valley.
  21. Yuehong, Y., Zeng, Y., Chen, X., & Fan, Y. (2016). The internet of things in healthcare: An overview. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 1, 3–13. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,388

Metadata

Authors
Makowski, D., Pham, T., Lau, Z. J., Brammer, J. C., Lespinasse, F., Pham, H., Schölzel, C., & Chen, S. H. A.
Venue
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
1689-1696
ISSN
  • 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-3528
OpenAlex
W3127637041
Cited by
1,388
References
7
FWCI
159.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y
The paper
Makowski, D., Pham, T., Lau, Z. J., Brammer, J. C., Lespinasse, F., Pham, H., Schölzel, C., & Chen, S. H. A. (2021). NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.