Cited by 26Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Large-scale Top-down Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Open access
McCool, Elijah N., Lubeckyj, Rachele, Shen, Xiaojing, Kou, Qiang, Liu, Xiaowen, Sun, Liangliang·2018·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

Capillary zone electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (CZE-ESI-MS/MS) has been recognized as a useful tool for top-down proteomics that aims to characterize proteoforms in complex proteomes. However, the application of CZE-MS/MS for large-scale top-down proteomics has been impeded by the low sample-loading capacity and narrow separation window of CZE. Here, a protocol is described using CZE-MS/MS with a microliter-scale sample-loading volume and a 90-min separation window for large-scale top-down proteomics. The CZE-MS/MS platform is based on a linear polyacrylamide (LPA)-coated separation capillary with extremely low electroosmotic flow, a dynamic pH-junction-based online sample concentration method with a high efficiency for protein stacking, an electro-kinetically pumped sheath flow CE-MS interface with extremely high sensitivity, and an ion trap mass spectrometer with high mass resolution and scan speed. The platform can be used for the high-resolution characterization of simple intact protein samples and the large-scale characterization of proteoforms in various complex proteomes. As an example, a highly efficient separation of a standard protein mixture and a highly sensitive detection of many impurities using the platform is demonstrated. As another example, this platform can produce over 500 proteoform and 190 protein identifications from an Escherichia coli proteome in a single CZE-MS/MS run.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/58644

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A dynamic pH junction protocol for top-down analysis of complex samples achieved microliter-scale sample-loading volume.

    “McCool and co-workers described a protocol for top-down analysis of complex samples using a dynamic pH junction where a microliter-scale sample-loading volume was achieved52.”
  • Sample loading is the major drawback of CE and can be addressed using simple protocols, as shown in top-down and bottom-up applications.

    “Sample loading is the major drawback of CE, which can be addressed using simple protocols, as demonstrated in top-down and bottom-up applications52,87.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCool, E. N., Lubeckyj, R., Shen, X., Kou, Q., Liu, X., & Sun, L.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • McCool, Elijah N.
  • Lubeckyj, Rachele
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2018-10-24
Issue
140
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898213481
Cited by
26
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM118470, R01GM125991)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
top-down proteomics, capillary zone electrophoresis, tandem mass spectrometry, proteoforms, ion trap mass spectrometer, Escherichia coli proteome
MeSH terms
Electrophoresis, Capillary, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review