Cited by 29Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Open-Label Administration of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Improves Executive Function Impairments and Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults

Brown, Thomas E., Brams, Matthew, Gao, Joseph, Gasior, Maria, Childress, Ann·2010·Postgraduate Medicine

Abstract

Introduction/objective Executive function (EF) impairment in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may account for behavioral symptoms such as poor concentration, impaired working memory, problems in shifting among tasks, and prioritizing and planning complex sets of tasks or completing long-term projects at work or school. Poor self-regulation and control of emotional behaviors frequently are seen in patients with ADHD. This study assessed EF behaviors in adults with ADHD at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX). Methods Executive function behavior was assessed using the Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scale (BADDS) during the 4-week open-label dose-optimization phase prior to a 2-period, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of LDX (30-70 mg/day). The ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) with adult prompts assessed ADHD symptoms. Change in EF behavioral symptoms was evaluated based on week 4 BADDS total and cluster scores; analyses of shifts from baseline among subjects with BADDS scores Results At week 4, BADDS total and cluster scores were reduced (ie, improved; all P Conclusion Clinically optimized doses of LDX (30-70 mg/day) significantly improved EF behaviors in adults with ADHD. Treatment-emergent adverse events with LDX were consistent with those observed with long-term stimulant use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3810/pgm.2010.09.2196

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, T. E., Brams, M., Gao, J., Gasior, M., & Childress, A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Principal Investigator, Bayou City Research, Houston, TX
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Thomas E.
Venue
Postgraduate Medicine
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
7-17
ISSN
  • 0032-5481 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-9260
OpenAlex
W2047273149
Cited by
29
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Postgraduate Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, adult ADHD, executive function, stimulant medication, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, dose optimization, treatment-emergent adverse events, working memory, self-regulation, ADHD symptoms, open-label extension, stimulant side effects, task shifting, irritability
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Cross-Over Studies, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review