Cited by 25Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exterior Companions to Hot Jupiters Orbiting Cool Stars Are Coplanar

Open access

Abstract

The existence of hot Jupiters has challenged theories of planetary formation since the first extrasolar planets were detected. Giant planets are generally believed to form far from their host stars, where volatile materials like water exist in their solid phase, making it easier for giant planet cores to accumulate. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how giant planets can migrate inward from their birth sites to short-period orbits. One such mechanism, called Kozai–Lidov migration, requires the presence of distant companions in orbits inclined by more than ∼40° with respect to the plane of the hot Jupiter’s orbit. The high occurrence rate of wide companions in hot-Jupiter systems lends support to this theory for migration. However, the exact orbital inclinations of these detected planetary and stellar companions is not known, so it is not clear whether the mutual inclination of these companions is large enough for the Kozai–Lidov process to operate. This paper shows that in systems orbiting cool stars with convective outer layers, the orbits of most wide planetary companions to hot Jupiters must be well aligned with the orbits of the hot Jupiters and the spins of the host stars. For a variety of possible distributions for the inclination of the companion, the width of the distribution must be less than ∼20° to recreate the observations with good fidelity. As a result, the companion orbits are likely well aligned with those of the hot Jupiters, and the Kozai–Lidov mechanism does not enforce migration in these systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9176

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Becker et al. (2017) found that detected planet companions in six hot Jupiter systems cannot have sufficient mutual inclination to have driven Kozai-Lidov high eccentricity tidal migration of the hot Jupiters.

    “Becker et al. (2017) recently found that detected planet companions in six hot Jupiters systems cannot have sufficient mutual inclination to have driven Kozai-Lidov high eccentricity tidal migration of the hot Jupiters.”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Becker et al. 2017

    The Sample Selection section identifies six hot-Jupiter systems with exterior companions. The Conclusion says the mutual inclinations needed for Kozai–Lidov migration are strongly disfavored by the statistical analysis. But the Caveats section explicitly says the analysis cannot determine inclinations for individual systems, so it does not establish that the detected companion in each of the six systems could not have driven that migration. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Adams, 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3676, 10.1093/mnras/stu2397 · DOI
  2. Albrecht, 2012, ApJ, 757, 18, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/18 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Anderson, 2011, A&A, 534, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117597 · DOI
  4. Bakos, 2009, ApJ, 707, 446, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/446 · DOI
  5. Batygin, 2012, Natur, 491, 418, 10.1038/nature11560 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Batygin, 2016, ApJ, 829, 114, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/114 · DOI
  7. Becker, 2017, MNRAS, 468, 549, 10.1093/mnras/stx461 · DOI
  8. Becker, 2013, ApJ, 778, 100, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/100 · DOI
  9. Becker, 2015, ApJL, 812, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L18 · DOI
  10. Bryan, 2016, ApJ, 821, 89, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/89 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Burke, 2007, ApJ, 671, 2115, 10.1086/523087 · DOI
  12. Cumming, 2008, PASP, 120, 531, 10.1086/588487 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Damasso, 2015, A&A, 575, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425332 · DOI
  14. Dawson, 2015, ApJ, 798, 66, 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/66 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fabrycky, 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298, 10.1086/521702 · DOI
  16. Fabrycky, 2009, ApJ, 696, 1230, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1230 · DOI
  17. Fielding, 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3306, 10.1093/mnras/stv836 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fressin, 2013, ApJ, 766, 81, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/81 · DOI
  19. Hellier, 2012, MNRAS, 426, 739, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21780.x · DOI
  20. Huang, 2016, ApJ, 825, 98, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/98 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hut, 1980, A&A, 92, 167
  22. Kley, 2012, ARA&A, 50, 211, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125523 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Knutson, 2014, ApJ, 785, 126, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/126 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kovács, 2007, ApJL, 670, L41, 10.1086/524058 · DOI
  25. Kraft, 1967, ApJ, 150, 551, 10.1086/149359 · DOI
  26. Lai, 2012, MNRAS, 423, 486, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20893.x · DOI
  27. Lai, 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3532, 10.1093/mnras/stu485 · DOI
  28. Lai, 2011, MNRAS, 412, 2790, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18127.x · DOI
  29. Lai, 2017, AJ, 153, 42, 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/42 · DOI
  30. Lee, 2014, ApJ, 797, 95, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/95 · DOI
  31. Lidov, 1962, P&SS, 9, 719, 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Ma, 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2781, 10.1093/mnras/stu134 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Marcy, 2005, PThPS, 158, 24, 10.1143/PTPS.158.24 · DOI
  34. Maxted, 2011, PASP, 123, 547, 10.1086/660007 · DOI
  35. Maxted, 2010, AJ, 140, 2007, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/2007 · DOI
  36. Mazeh, 2015, ApJ, 801, 3, 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/3 · DOI
  37. Morton, 2014, ApJ, 796, 47, 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/47 · DOI
  38. Murray, 1999, Solar System Dynamics
  39. Nagasawa, 2008, ApJ, 678, 498, 10.1086/529369 · DOI
  40. Naoz, 2011, Natur, 473, 187, 10.1038/nature10076 · DOI
  41. Neveu-VanMalle, 2016, A&A, 586, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526965 · DOI
  42. Ngo, 2015, ApJ, 800, 138, 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/138 · DOI
  43. Ohta, 2005, ApJ, 622, 1118, 10.1086/428344 · DOI
  44. Patel, 2007, ApJ, 665, 744, 10.1086/519066 · DOI
  45. Petrovich, 2015, ApJ, 805, 75, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/75 · DOI
  46. Piskorz, 2015, ApJ, 814, 148, 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/148 · DOI
  47. Sahlmann, 2011, A&A, 525, A95, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015427 · DOI
  48. Sanchis-Ojeda, 2015b, ApJL, 812, L11, 10.1088/2041-8205/812/1/L11 · DOI
  49. Southworth, 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4205, 10.1093/mnras/stw279 · DOI
  50. Spalding, 2015, ApJ, 811, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/82 · DOI
  51. Spalding, 2017, AJ, 154, 93, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8174 · DOI
  52. Spalding, 2014, ApJL, 797, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/797/2/L29 · DOI
  53. Steffen, 2012, PNAS, 109, 7982, 10.1073/pnas.1120970109 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Stevenson, 1982, P&SS, 30, 755, 10.1016/0032-0633(82)90108-8 · DOI
  55. Tanaka, 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257, 10.1086/324713 · DOI
  56. Tremaine, 2012, AJ, 143, 94, 10.1088/0004-6256/143/4/94 · DOI
  57. Triaud, 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1714, 10.1093/mnras/stx154 · DOI
  58. van Saders, 2013, ApJ, 776, 67, 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/67 · DOI
  59. Vanderburg, 2017, AJ
  60. Vogt, 2002, ApJ, 568, 352, 10.1086/338768 · DOI
  61. Wang, 2015, ApJ, 799, 229, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/229 · DOI
  62. Weiss, 2017, AJ, 153, 265, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6c29 · DOI
  63. Winn, 2010a, ApJL, 718, L145, 10.1088/2041-8205/718/2/L145 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Winn, 2011, AJ, 141, 63, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/63 · DOI
  65. Winn, 2010b, ApJ, 718, 575, 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/575 · DOI
  66. Wittenmyer, 2009, AJ, 137, 3529, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3529 · DOI
  67. Zhou, 2017, AJ, 153, 211, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa674a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Becker, J. C., Vanderburg, A., Adams, F. C., Khain, T., & Bryan, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2017-11-16
Volume
154
Issue
6
Pages
230
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2760976486
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1053575, 1256260, 1144152)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (ACI-1053575, DGE 1256260)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • NASA Exoplanet Science Institute
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
hot Jupiters, cool stars, orbital inclination, giant planet migration, stellar obliquity, planet formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review