The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exterior Companions to Hot Jupiters Orbiting Cool Stars Are Coplanar
Open accessAbstract
The existence of hot Jupiters has challenged theories of planetary formation since the first extrasolar planets were detected. Giant planets are generally believed to form far from their host stars, where volatile materials like water exist in their solid phase, making it easier for giant planet cores to accumulate. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how giant planets can migrate inward from their birth sites to short-period orbits. One such mechanism, called Kozai–Lidov migration, requires the presence of distant companions in orbits inclined by more than ∼40° with respect to the plane of the hot Jupiter’s orbit. The high occurrence rate of wide companions in hot-Jupiter systems lends support to this theory for migration. However, the exact orbital inclinations of these detected planetary and stellar companions is not known, so it is not clear whether the mutual inclination of these companions is large enough for the Kozai–Lidov process to operate. This paper shows that in systems orbiting cool stars with convective outer layers, the orbits of most wide planetary companions to hot Jupiters must be well aligned with the orbits of the hot Jupiters and the spins of the host stars. For a variety of possible distributions for the inclination of the companion, the width of the distribution must be less than ∼20° to recreate the observations with good fidelity. As a result, the companion orbits are likely well aligned with those of the hot Jupiters, and the Kozai–Lidov mechanism does not enforce migration in these systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Becker et al. (2017) found that detected planet companions in six hot Jupiter systems cannot have sufficient mutual inclination to have driven Kozai-Lidov high eccentricity tidal migration of the hot Jupiters.
“Becker et al. (2017) recently found that detected planet companions in six hot Jupiters systems cannot have sufficient mutual inclination to have driven Kozai-Lidov high eccentricity tidal migration of the hot Jupiters.”
From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Becker et al. 2017
The Sample Selection section identifies six hot-Jupiter systems with exterior companions. The Conclusion says the mutual inclinations needed for Kozai–Lidov migration are strongly disfavored by the statistical analysis. But the Caveats section explicitly says the analysis cannot determine inclinations for individual systems, so it does not establish that the detected companion in each of the six systems could not have driven that migration. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity
Kozai, Y. (1962) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/108790 · Cited by 2,588
A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies
Chambers, J. E. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02379.x · Cited by 1,820
THE FREQUENCY OF HOT JUPITERS ORBITING NEARBY SOLAR-TYPE STARS
Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Morton, T. D., & Fischer, D. A. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/160 · Cited by 371 · cited 1×
“…are thought to account for only about 0.9 – 1.5% of the total population of planets (Marcy et al. 2005; Cumming et al. 2008; Mayor et al. 2011; Wright et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2015), they are over-represented in our current population of discovered exoplanets due to their large masses,…”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- Adams, 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3676, 10.1093/mnras/stu2397 · DOI
- Albrecht, 2012, ApJ, 757, 18, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/18 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 2011, A&A, 534, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117597 · DOI
- Bakos, 2009, ApJ, 707, 446, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/446 · DOI
- Batygin, 2012, Natur, 491, 418, 10.1038/nature11560 · DOI · Paper page
- Batygin, 2016, ApJ, 829, 114, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/114 · DOI
- Becker, 2017, MNRAS, 468, 549, 10.1093/mnras/stx461 · DOI
- Becker, 2013, ApJ, 778, 100, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/100 · DOI
- Becker, 2015, ApJL, 812, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L18 · DOI
- Bryan, 2016, ApJ, 821, 89, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/89 · DOI · Paper page
- Burke, 2007, ApJ, 671, 2115, 10.1086/523087 · DOI
- Cumming, 2008, PASP, 120, 531, 10.1086/588487 · DOI · Paper page
- Damasso, 2015, A&A, 575, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425332 · DOI
- Dawson, 2015, ApJ, 798, 66, 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/66 · DOI · Paper page
- Fabrycky, 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298, 10.1086/521702 · DOI
- Fabrycky, 2009, ApJ, 696, 1230, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1230 · DOI
- Fielding, 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3306, 10.1093/mnras/stv836 · DOI · Paper page
- Fressin, 2013, ApJ, 766, 81, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/81 · DOI
- Hellier, 2012, MNRAS, 426, 739, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21780.x · DOI
- Huang, 2016, ApJ, 825, 98, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/98 · DOI · Paper page
- Hut, 1980, A&A, 92, 167
- Kley, 2012, ARA&A, 50, 211, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125523 · DOI · Paper page
- Knutson, 2014, ApJ, 785, 126, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/126 · DOI · Paper page
- Kovács, 2007, ApJL, 670, L41, 10.1086/524058 · DOI
- Kraft, 1967, ApJ, 150, 551, 10.1086/149359 · DOI
- Lai, 2012, MNRAS, 423, 486, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20893.x · DOI
- Lai, 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3532, 10.1093/mnras/stu485 · DOI
- Lai, 2011, MNRAS, 412, 2790, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18127.x · DOI
- Lai, 2017, AJ, 153, 42, 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/42 · DOI
- Lee, 2014, ApJ, 797, 95, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/95 · DOI
- Lidov, 1962, P&SS, 9, 719, 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Ma, 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2781, 10.1093/mnras/stu134 · DOI · Paper page
- Marcy, 2005, PThPS, 158, 24, 10.1143/PTPS.158.24 · DOI
- Maxted, 2011, PASP, 123, 547, 10.1086/660007 · DOI
- Maxted, 2010, AJ, 140, 2007, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/2007 · DOI
- Mazeh, 2015, ApJ, 801, 3, 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/3 · DOI
- Morton, 2014, ApJ, 796, 47, 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/47 · DOI
- Murray, 1999, Solar System Dynamics
- Nagasawa, 2008, ApJ, 678, 498, 10.1086/529369 · DOI
- Naoz, 2011, Natur, 473, 187, 10.1038/nature10076 · DOI
- Neveu-VanMalle, 2016, A&A, 586, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526965 · DOI
- Ngo, 2015, ApJ, 800, 138, 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/138 · DOI
- Ohta, 2005, ApJ, 622, 1118, 10.1086/428344 · DOI
- Patel, 2007, ApJ, 665, 744, 10.1086/519066 · DOI
- Petrovich, 2015, ApJ, 805, 75, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/75 · DOI
- Piskorz, 2015, ApJ, 814, 148, 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/148 · DOI
- Sahlmann, 2011, A&A, 525, A95, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015427 · DOI
- Sanchis-Ojeda, 2015b, ApJL, 812, L11, 10.1088/2041-8205/812/1/L11 · DOI
- Southworth, 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4205, 10.1093/mnras/stw279 · DOI
- Spalding, 2015, ApJ, 811, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/82 · DOI
- Spalding, 2017, AJ, 154, 93, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8174 · DOI
- Spalding, 2014, ApJL, 797, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/797/2/L29 · DOI
- Steffen, 2012, PNAS, 109, 7982, 10.1073/pnas.1120970109 · DOI · Paper page
- Stevenson, 1982, P&SS, 30, 755, 10.1016/0032-0633(82)90108-8 · DOI
- Tanaka, 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257, 10.1086/324713 · DOI
- Tremaine, 2012, AJ, 143, 94, 10.1088/0004-6256/143/4/94 · DOI
- Triaud, 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1714, 10.1093/mnras/stx154 · DOI
- van Saders, 2013, ApJ, 776, 67, 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/67 · DOI
- Vanderburg, 2017, AJ
- Vogt, 2002, ApJ, 568, 352, 10.1086/338768 · DOI
- Wang, 2015, ApJ, 799, 229, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/229 · DOI
- Weiss, 2017, AJ, 153, 265, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6c29 · DOI
- Winn, 2010a, ApJL, 718, L145, 10.1088/2041-8205/718/2/L145 · DOI · Paper page
- Winn, 2011, AJ, 141, 63, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/63 · DOI
- Winn, 2010b, ApJ, 718, 575, 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/575 · DOI
- Wittenmyer, 2009, AJ, 137, 3529, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3529 · DOI
- Zhou, 2017, AJ, 153, 211, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa674a · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dawson, R. I., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, J. C., Vanderburg, A., Adams, F. C., Khain, T., & Bryan, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2017-11-16
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 230
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2760976486
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1053575, 1256260, 1144152)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (ACI-1053575, DGE 1256260)
- California Institute of Technology
- NASA Exoplanet Science Institute
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- hot Jupiters, cool stars, orbital inclination, giant planet migration, stellar obliquity, planet formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review