Cited by 26Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

An Analysis of the North Polar Spur Using HaloSat

Open access
LaRocca, Daniel M., Kaaret, Philip, Kuntz, K. D., Hodges-Kluck, Edmund, Zajczyk, Anna, Bluem, Jesse, Ringuette, Rebecca, Jahoda, Keith M.·2020·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present HaloSat X-ray observations of the entirety of the bright X-ray emitting feature known as the North Polar Spur (NPS). The large field of view of HaloSat enabled coverage of the entire bright NPS in only 14 fields, which were each observed for ≈30,000 s. We find that the NPS fields are distinct in both brightness and spectral shape from the surrounding halo fields. We fit the NPS as two thermal components in ionization equilibrium with temperatures and . We note a temperature gradient in the NPS hot component with an inner arc temperature warmer than the outer arc. The emission measures we find for the cool component of the NPS is a factor of 3–5 greater than that of the hot component, which suggests that the bulk of the NPS material is in the ≈0.1 keV component. We evaluate distance estimates of 0.4 and 8.0 kpc for the NPS. Our findings suggest a preference for a distant NPS with an energy of ≈ 6 × 10 54 erg, an age of ≈ 10 Myr, and pressures consistent with a 10 μ G magnetic field associated with the Fermi bubbles. The electron density ≈10 × 10−3 cm−3 is consistent with estimates for the shock region surrounding a Galactic-scale event.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/abbdfd

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zajczyk, A., Kaaret, P., Kirchner, D., et al. 2018, Proc. AIAA/USU Conf. on Small Satellites, Upcoming Missions, SSC18-WKIX-01 https:// digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2018/all2018/471/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaRocca, D. M., Kaaret, P., Kuntz, K. D., Hodges-Kluck, E., Zajczyk, A., Bluem, J., Ringuette, R., & Jahoda, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
Corresponding author
LaRocca, Daniel M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
904
Issue
1
Pages
54
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3109548852
Cited by
26
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) (public-domain)
Funders
  • NASA (NNX15AU57G)
  • Iowa Space Grant Consortium (NNX16AL88H)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
North Polar Spur, X-ray emission, thermal plasma, ionization equilibrium, temperature gradient, emission measure, distance estimates, Fermi bubbles, magnetic field, Galactic halo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review