Cited by 32Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

On the distance to the North Polar Spur and the local CO-H2factor

Open access
Lallement, R., Snowden, S., Kuntz, K. D., Dame, T. M., Koutroumpa, D., Grenier, I., Casandjian, J. M.·2016·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Aims. Most models identify the X-ray bright North Polar Spur (NPS) with a hot interstellar (IS) bubble in the Sco-Cen star-forming region at ≃130 pc. An opposite view considers the NPS as a distant structure associated with Galactic nuclear outflows. Constraints on the NPS distance can be obtained by comparing the foreground IS gas column inferred from X-ray absorption to the distribution of gas and dust along the line of sight. Absorbing columns toward shadowing molecular clouds simultaneously constrain the CO-H2 conversion factor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201629453

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • X-ray spectra indicate a metallicity of 0.2-0.7 Z⊙, consistent with the metallicity of the CGM (≃0.5 Z⊙) rather than the ISM (≃Z⊙).

    “Additionally, the X-ray spectra indicate a metallicity of 0 . 2 -0 . 7 Z ⊙ (Kataoka et al. 2013; Gu et al. 2016; Lallement et al. 2016), consistent with the metallicity of the CGM ( ≃ 0 . 5 Z ⊙ ; Miller & Bregman 2015; Faerman et al. 2017, 2020) than the ISM ( ≃ Z ⊙ ; Maciel & Costa 2010; De Cia et al. 2021).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Lallement et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lallement, R., Snowden, S., Kuntz, K. D., Dame, T. M., Koutroumpa, D., Grenier, I., & Casandjian, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Observatoire de Paris (FR)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2016-11
Volume
595
Pages
A131
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2519440505
Cited by
32
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AG24G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
North Polar Spur, interstellar bubbles, distance estimation, X-ray absorption, molecular clouds, shadowing, interstellar dust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review