Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Macrophage infiltration and its prognostic implications in breast cancer: The relationship with VEGF expression and microvessel density

Tsutsui, Shinichi, Yasuda, Kazuhiro, Suzuki, Kosuke, Tahara, Kouichirou, Higashi, Hidefumi, Era, Shoichi·2005·Oncology Reports

Abstract

Stromal cells, within and around the tumor, as well as tumor cells are both involved in angiogenesis which is an important step in tumor growth and metastasis. Among such stromal cells, macrophages are known to play various roles in tumor angiogenesis and have thus been called tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). The TAM density, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and the microvessel density (MVD) were immunohistochemically evaluated in 249 paraffin-embedded sections of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. The TAM density and MVD were assessed as the average density of three hot spots at a magnification of x400 and x200, respectively. The TAM density showed a significant correlation with both the VEGF expression and MVD, while a significant correlation was also found between the VEGF expression and MVD. The TAM density was also associated with the nuclear grade, estrogen receptor status and MIB-1 count. Patients with a high TAM density had a significantly (p=0.0025) worse disease-free survival (DFS) prognosis than those with a low TAM density, while univariate analyses also indicated both the MVD (p<0.0001) and VEGF expression (p=0.0152) to be prognostic factors for DFS. A multivariate analysis indicated MVD (p=0.0057), as well as lymph node metastasis and the MIB-1 count, to be independently significant prognostic factors for DFS. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a close association between TAM infiltration and both the VEGF expression and MVD. The prognostic significance of MVD was the strongest among these three factors in breast cancer. These findings suggested that the prognostic implications of TAM infiltration are due to the involvement of TAMs in tumor angiogenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3892/or.14.2.425

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tsutsui, S., Yasuda, K., Suzuki, K., Tahara, K., Higashi, H., & Era, S.
Venue
Oncology Reports
Published
2005-08-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
425-31
ISSN
  • 1021-335X (ISSN-L)
  • 1791-2431
OpenAlex
W2085442790
Cited by
366
References
0
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.