CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of dietary adherence on the body weight plateau: a mathematical model incorporating intermittent compliance with energy intake prescription

Thomas, Diana M, Martin, Corby K, Redman, Leanne M, Heymsfield, Steven B, Lettieri, Steven, Levine, James A, Bouchard, Claude, Schoeller, Dale A·2014·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.113.079822
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Clinical weight loss in individuals typically stabilizes at 6 mo. However, validated models of dynamic energy balance have consistently shown weight plateaus between 1 and 2 y. The cause for this discrepancy is unclear. Objective We developed 2 mathematical models on the basis of the first law of thermodynamics to investigate plausible explanations for reaching an early weight plateau at 6 mo. Design The first model was an energy-expenditure adaptation model and was applied to determine the degree of metabolic adaptation required to generate this plateau. The second model was an intermittent lack-of-adherence model formulated by using a randomly fluctuating energy intake term accounting for intermittent noncompliance in dietary intake to reach this plateau. To set model variables, validate models, and compare free-living weight-loss patterns to in-residence supervised programs, we applied the following 4 different studies: The US NHANES 1999-2004, Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIE) weight-loss study, the Bouchard Twin overfeeding study, and the Minnesota Starvation Experiment. Results The metabolic adaptation model increased final weight but did not affect the predicted plateau time point. The intermittent lack-of-adherence model generated oscillating weight graphs that have been frequently observed in weight-loss studies. The model showed that a 6-mo weight-loss plateau can be attained despite what can be considere…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.113.079822

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Miller, 1975, Resistance to slimming: adaptation or illusion?, Lancet, 1, 773, 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92437-X · DOI
  2. Cannon, 2005, Dieting. Makes you fat?, Br J Nutr, 93, 569, 10.1079/BJN20041382 · DOI
  3. Dansinger, 2005, Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial, JAMA, 293, 43, 10.1001/jama.293.1.43 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Heymsfield, 2007, Why do obese patients not lose more weight when treated with low-calorie diets? A mechanistic perspective, Am J Clin Nutr, 85, 346, 10.1093/ajcn/85.2.346 · DOI
  5. Thomas, 2011, A simple model predicting individual weight change in humans, J Biol Dyn, 5, 579, 10.1080/17513758.2010.508541 · DOI
  6. Heilbronn, 2006, Effect of 6-month calorie restriction on biomarkers of longevity, metabolic adaptation, and oxidative stress in overweight individuals: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 295, 1539, 10.1001/jama.295.13.1539 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bouchard, 1990, The response to long-term overfeeding in identical twins, N Engl J Med, 322, 1477, 10.1056/NEJM199005243222101 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Thomas, 2010, A computational model to determine energy intake during weight loss, Am J Clin Nutr, 92, 1326, 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29687 · DOI
  9. de Jonge, 2007, Validation study of energy expenditure and intake during calorie restriction using doubly labeled water and changes in body composition, Am J Clin Nutr, 85, 73, 10.1093/ajcn/85.1.73 · DOI
  10. Pieper, 2011, Development of adherence metrics for caloric restriction interventions, Clin Trials, 8, 155, 10.1177/1740774511398369 · DOI
  11. Hall, 2011, Estimating changes in free-living energy intake and its confidence interval, Am J Clin Nutr, 94, 66, 10.3945/ajcn.111.014399 · DOI
  12. Hall, 2011, Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight, Lancet, 378, 826, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60812-X · DOI · Paper page
  13. The Adherence Calculator. Version 17 June 2014. Available from: http://pbrc.edu/research-and-faculty/calculators/adherence/ (cited 17 June 2014). · DOI
  14. Rosenbaum, 2008, Long-term persistence of adaptive thermogenesis in subjects who have maintained a reduced body weight, Am J Clin Nutr, 88, 906, 10.1093/ajcn/88.4.906 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Stice, 2011, Weight suppression and risk of future increases in body mass: effects of suppressed resting metabolic rate and energy expenditure, Am J Clin Nutr, 94, 7, 10.3945/ajcn.110.010025 · DOI
  16. Camps, 2013, Weight loss, weight maintenance, and adaptive thermogenesis, Am J Clin Nutr, 97, 990, 10.3945/ajcn.112.050310 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, D. M., Martin, C. K., Redman, L. M., Heymsfield, S. B., Lettieri, S., Levine, J. A., Bouchard, C., & Schoeller, D. A.
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
787-795
ISSN
0002-9165
DOI
10.3945/ajcn.113.079822
Cited by
56
References
8
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review