Cited by 553Birth, Development, and HealthGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Perinatal risk factors for childhood obesity and metabolic dysregulation

Open access
Catalano, Patrick M, Farrell, Kristen, Thomas, Alicia, Huston-Presley, Larraine, Mencin, Patricia, de Mouzon, Sylvie Hauguel, Amini, Saeid B·2009·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Childhood obesity has increased significantly in recent decades. Objective The objective was to examine the perinatal risk factors related to childhood obesity. Design In a prospective study, 89 women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their offspring were evaluated at birth and at 8.8 +/- 1.8 y. At birth, obstetrical data, parental anthropometric measures, and neonatal body composition were assessed; at follow-up, diet and activity were assessed and laboratory studies were conducted. Weight was classified by using weight for age and sex, and body composition was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In childhood, data were analyzed as tertiles and prediction models were developed by using logistic and stepwise regression. Results No significant differences in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention weight percentiles, body composition, and most metabolic measures were observed between children of mothers with NGT and GDM at follow-up. Children in the upper tertile for weight had greater energy intake (P = 0.02), skinfold thickness (P = 0.0001), and leptin concentrations (P < 0.0001) than did those in tertiles 1 and 2. Children in the upper tertile for percentage body fat had greater waist circumference (P = 0.0001), insulin resistance (P = 0.002), and triglyceride (P = 0.009) and leptin (P = 0.0001) concentrations than did children in tertiles 1 and 2. The correlation between body fat at birth and follow-up was r = 0.29 (P = 0.02). The strongest perinatal predictor for a child in the upper tertile for weight was maternal pregravid body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) >30 (odds ratio: 3.75; 95% CI: 1.39, 10.10; P = 0.009) and for percentage body fat was maternal pregravid BMI >30 (odds ratio: 5.45; 95% CI: 1.62, 18.41; P = 0.006). Conclusion Maternal pregravid BMI, independent of maternal glucose status or birth weight, was the strongest predictor of childhood obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27416

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent metabolomics studies within the HAPO Study and other cohorts support the concept that mixed nutrients (sugars, lipids, amino acids) contribute to associations of maternal hyperglycemia with newborn outcomes.

    “However, recent metabolomics studies performed within the HAPO Study and within other cohorts support the concept that mixed nutrients (eg, sugars, lipids, and amino acids) contribute to associations of maternal hyperglycemia with newborn outcomes.34,35”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Catalano, P. M., Farrell, K., Thomas, A., Huston-Presley, L., Mencin, P., de Mouzon, S. H., & Amini, S. B.
Affiliations
MetroHealth (US)
Corresponding author
Catalano, Patrick M
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
1303-1313
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107055442
Cited by
553
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 28
FWCI
24.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 024989, UL1RR024989)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-22965)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
childhood obesity, perinatal risk factors, gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal glucose tolerance, body composition, insulin resistance, leptin, energy intake, skinfold thickness, waist circumference, triglycerides, metabolic dysfunction, offspring
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Child, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Metabolic Diseases, Mothers, Obesity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, United States, Weight Gain, Odds Ratio, Diabetes, Gestational, Glucose Intolerance, Perinatal Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review