The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dietary Protein Requirement of Female Adults >65 Years Determined by the Indicator Amino Acid Oxidation Technique Is Higher Than Current Recommendations
Open accessAbstract
Background Studies on protein requirements in vulnerable groups such as older adults are few, and results are conflicting.Objective The main objective of this study was to determine the protein requirements of free-living women >65 y by measuring the oxidation of l-[1-(13)C]phenylalanine to (13)CO2 in response to graded intakes of protein.Methods Twelve subjects participated in the study, with protein intakes ranging from 0.2 to 2.0 g · kg(-1) · d(-1) for a total of 82 studies. The diets provided energy at 1.5 times each subject's resting energy expenditure and were isocaloric. Protein was given as an amino acid mixture on the basis of the egg protein pattern, except for phenylalanine and tyrosine, which were maintained constant across the protein intake amounts. All subjects were adapted for 2 d before the study day to a protein intake of 1.0 g · kg(-1) · d(-1). The mean protein requirement was determined by applying a mixed-effects change-point regression analysis to F(13)CO2 (label tracer oxidation in (13)CO2 breath), which identified a breakpoint in the F(13)CO2 in response to graded amounts of protein.Results The mean estimated average requirement (EAR) and upper 95% CI (approximating the RDA) protein requirement of women >65 y were 0.96 and 1.29 g · kg(-1) · d(-1), respectively.Conclusion These estimates of protein requirements for older women are higher than the current EAR and RDA based on nitrogen balance data, which are 0.66 and 0.80 g · kg(-1) · d(-1), respectively. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01604980.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This conclusion is emphasised for older men79 and women80 81 wishing to obtain strength and gain lean mass with RET and protein supplementation.”
From A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults (2018) · cites this paper as [81]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“older adults require more protein per day,79–81”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trumbo, P., Schlicker, S., Yates, A. A., & Poos, M. (2002) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90346-9 · Cited by 5,993
Li, T.-H. (2013) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b15154-8 · Cited by 2,751
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Cited by 2,553
The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness
Durnin, J. V. G. A., & Rahaman, M. M. (1967) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19670070 · Cited by 1,689
Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition
Lukaski, H. C., Bolonchuk, W. W., Hall, C. B., & Siders, W. A. (1986) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1986.60.4.1327 · Cited by 1,370
Houston, D. K., Nicklas, B. J., Ding, J., Harris, T. B., Tylavsky, F. A., Newman, A. B., Lee, J. S., Sahyoun, N. R., Visser, M., & Kritchevsky, S. B. (2008) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/87.1.150 · Cited by 1,214
Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults
Rand, W. M., Pellett, P. L., & Young, V. R. (2003) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/77.1.109 · Cited by 506
Measurement of leucine metabolism in man from a primed, continuous infusion of L-[1-3C]leucine
Matthews, D. E., Motil, K. J., Rohrbaugh, D. K., Burke, J. F., Young, V. R., & Bier, D. M. (1980) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1980.238.5.e473 · Cited by 493
Volpi, E., Mittendorfer, B., Rasmussen, B. B., & Wolfe, R. R. (2000) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.85.12.7021 · Cited by 464
Role of dietary protein in the sarcopenia of aging
Paddon‐Jones, D., Short, K. R., Campbell, W. W., Volpi, E., & Wolfe, R. R. (2008) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1562s · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morton, R. W., Murphy, K. T., McKellar, S. R., Schoenfeld, B. J., Henselmans, M., Helms, E., Aragon, A. A., Devries, M. C., Banfield, L., Krieger, J. W., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608 · Cited by 1,269
Protein "requirements" beyond the RDA: implications for optimizing health
Phillips, S. M., Chevalier, S., & Leidy, H. J. (2016) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2015-0550 · Cited by 396
Traylor, D. A., Gorissen, S. H. M., & Phillips, S. M. (2018) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmy003 · Cited by 243
Loenneke, J. P., Loprinzi, P. D., Murphy, C. H., & Phillips, S. M. (2016) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.002 · Cited by 216
Protein intake and muscle function in older adults
Deer, R. R., & Volpi, E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000000162 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Rafii, M., Chapman, K., Owens, J., Elango, R., Campbell, W. W., Ball, R. O., Pencharz, P. B., & Courtney-Martin, G.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-24
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115817612
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Mead Johnson Nutrition
- Hospital for Sick Children
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MT10321)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Keywords
- protein requirements, older women, indicator amino acid oxidation, phenylalanine oxidation, nitrogen balance, estimated average requirement, RDA
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amino Acids, Energy Intake, Carbon Isotopes, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Female, Fluorine, Humans, Isotope Labeling, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutritional Requirements, Oxidation-Reduction, Phenylalanine, Tyrosine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
