Cited by 87Muscle metabolism and nutritionNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Dietary Protein Requirement of Men >65 Years Old Determined by the Indicator Amino Acid Oxidation Technique Is Higher than the Current Estimated Average Requirement

Open access
Rafii, Mahroukh, Chapman, Karen, Elango, Rajavel, Campbell, Wayne W, Ball, Ronald O, Pencharz, Paul B, Courtney-Martin, Glenda·2016·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Background The current estimated average requirement (EAR) and RDA for protein of 0.66 and 0.8 g ⋅ kg-1 ⋅ d-1, respectively, for adults, including older men, are based on nitrogen balance data analyzed by monolinear regression. Recent studies in young men and older women that used the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique suggest that those values may be too low. This observation is supported by 2-phase linear crossover analysis of the nitrogen balance data.Objective The main objective of this study was to determine the protein requirement for older men by using the IAAO technique.Methods Six men aged >65 y were studied; each individual was tested 7 times with protein intakes ranging from 0.2 to 2.0 g ⋅ kg-1 ⋅ d-1 in random order for a total of 42 studies. The diets provided energy at 1.5 times the resting energy expenditure and were isocaloric. Protein was consumed hourly for 8 h as an amino acid mixture with the composition of egg protein with L-[1-13C]phenylalanine as the indicator amino acid. The group mean protein requirement was determined by applying a mixed-effects change-point regression analysis to F13CO2 (label tracer oxidation in breath 13CO2), which identified a breakpoint in F13CO2 in response to graded intakes of protein.Results The estimated protein requirement and RDA for older men were 0.94 and 1.24 g ⋅ kg-1 ⋅ d-1, respectively, which are not different from values we published using the same method in young men and older women.Conclusions The current intake recommendations for older adults for dietary protein of 0.66 g ⋅ kg-1 ⋅ d-1 for the EAR and 0.8 g ⋅ kg-1 ⋅ d-1 for the RDA appear to be underestimated by ∼30%. Future longer-term studies should be conducted to validate these results. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01948492.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/jn.115.225631

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bales CW, Ritchie CS. Sarcopenia, weight loss, and nutritional frailty in the elderly. Annu Rev Nutr 2002;22:309-23.
  2. WHO/FAO/UNU. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrit- ion. Report of a joint WHO/FAO/UNU expert consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2007;935:103-33.
  3. Pencharz PB, Ball RO. Different approaches to define individual amino acid requirements. Annu Rev Nutr 2003;23:101-16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rafii, M., Chapman, K., Elango, R., Campbell, W. W., Ball, R. O., Pencharz, P. B., & Courtney-Martin, G.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
146
Issue
4
Pages
681-687
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294814573
Cited by
87
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute of Health Research (MT 10321)
  • Pfizer Consumer Healthcare
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
protein requirements, older men, indicator amino acid oxidation, estimated average requirement, RDA, nitrogen balance, change-point regression, protein intake recommendations, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review